crawf wrote: ↑

Tue Oct 27, 2020 9:37 pm

Fits well with it's ugly neighbour

So tired of these rubbish designs filling the city skyline.

I'd be surprised if the ACC would approve this monstrosity!

According to this, the original renders fit the description better than the most recent ones. 18 level and 15 level side by side. "The Cullinan project manager John Ong told InDaily stage one of the new residential and retail developments would begin in November and consist of a 15-storey resid...

This should be built on the old Trims site. Buy it from Kyren and build it there. At least the height and density there, would be welcomed.

This is coming up for assessment on 14 October.

EBG wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 14, 2020 9:22 pm

Update for 62 South Tce, . Picture 14/9/2020. Now working on level 7- roof top level . I thought this was to be 8 stories ? Does anyone know for sure how many stories this project is to be? Please click on picture for bigger.

8 levels including ground according to render on page 111

From this week.

Slowly but surely the CITY is overtaking the TOWN!

Good to see they will incorporate Darwin's esplanade precinct into the Riverbank precinct!!

The southern side looks bad, but I suppose there will probably be another building go up eventually next to it to block it. You are surely jesting? This is one of the most classiest 'blank walls' on a recent build we have seen. No complaints from anyone about the atrocity of ONE FLINDERS! COMPARE t...

from my view south of the city this one appears to be around the same height as the black stump and telstra. does the level of the land really fall away that much as you go down curry street?? GOOGLE EARTH puts Westpac at 60m above sea level and Sofitel at 55m. That said, there is a reasonable heig...

Paid and staying there at the end of October. Seven of us for our business anniversary. Hope they survive until then!!!!

1NEEDS2POST wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:30 pm

Nine storey, but only seven apartments. How does that work?

More than likely 2 levels of carparking behind the house.

Mpol03 wrote: ↑

Sun Aug 09, 2020 6:00 pm

That last render makes me a tad nervous as the building in the left looks a lot better in the render than it does in person.

Expected nothing less from you Mpol03. You are the epitome of negativity!!

I don't know the city, especially its southern part, well enough to be certain of which buildings are in either picture. I think that the disputed photo shows a narrow stripe across the "real" photo. Could someone please either A) draw the edges of the long-range photo across the South Te...

By examining the photo close up the depth of field seems to be correct if the sharpest point of focus is the closest building, baring in mind a telephoto lens has a shallower depth of field than say a standard or wide angle focal length lens, meaning this has not been cropped to the degree of using...

Here 2 photos taken from the sixth floor of AIR Apartments. Big difference.