Hooligan wrote:

adam73837 wrote: BTW, does anyone else find it amusing that the day after this vision is released, the SANFL and SACA come closer to sigining an agreement? LOL

What have they done?

A day or two after the plan was released, it said in the 'tiser that they were a step closer to signing an agreement.

Clearly there are many posters who dislike this proposal because of the political party involved and have made this quite clear either overtly or by finding excuses to denigrate it (putting aside genuine criticism). I don't believe this is in the spirit of sensational-adelaide (atleast in this part...

Just quickly, for all my beloved post critics out there, I personally know people that suffer from depression and I do hope Foley undergoes a quick recovery.

A post.

Very well said Howie!

can I also just ask you rhino and pistol, stadium aside, do you really think that putting a hospital on the riverfront precinct is a better idea that putting an entertainment precinct with cafes, restaurants and hotels? Did I also mention the saving of $1bn?

Now, I'd like to remind you that that Document was written in 2005 (as I mentioned, but perhaps we looked over that?). Now don't anyone start this "But they were wrong" stuff, because what are the stats for the people that use the tram? It'd probably be quite hard to obtain such statistics...

Here's a little something for people to read:
http://www.raa.net/download.asp?file=do ... nt_677.pdf It's relatively old (published in 2005), however there are still several good points there. Enjoy. Take note of the last page...

Just to say what everyone expected me to say: I am very glad indeed. :mrgreen: :D 8) However, I do share the curiosity of some other people here as to why it ends before Regency Road, but I'm sure that as we hear more about this project they'll announce an overpass at this junction; after all didn't...

Hooligan wrote:

garys_power wrote:
But the Adelaide Park Lands Authority has requested legal advice to determine what the council's obligations and rights are surrounding the land.

I facepalmed when reading this

I second that emotion

If you can read this then you've gone too far back in the thread and need to go back to the end of it.

A post.

In every post you complain about "Media Mike". Yes I do; and this isn't a dictatorship, I have just as much a right to complain about Media Mike as you do to praise him. And don't anyone say that there is a limit, because there has been quite a bit of Rann worshipping around the place (no...

Such as building a railway beneath the CBD where the population is only a small percentage of the number of people living in the areas that the freeways of which Shuz talks about would serve? :D Despite your smiley, the answer is a resounding yes . Although the proportion of people living in the Ci...

jk1237 wrote:update from Carrick Hill this morning. Was a tad hazey though

Wow, it really is having a good impact on the skyline. Nice pic jk1237.

The outer-suburban extremities of the North-South Corridor - Southern & Northern Expressways (and their respective extensions) are already completed/proposed for construction. Sturt Highway's duplication to the Barossa is nearly completed, and Victor Harbor Road is at some point slated for dupl...