Human pressures on the coastal fringe would be trying to make you think and consider about how various human uses for the coast (eg. residential and recreational uses) have an impact on the natural coastal processes such as beach erosion, longshore drift and the building and clearing of sand dunes that naturally build up behind where beaches form.gizmo wrote:It's the part that is most difficult in my essay. I just took it as Gold Coast, an expanding beachside city can be compared to Glenelg and therefore doesn't want to fall behind in its urbanization. I'm sure Henley Beach and Port Adelaide experienced pressure from Glenelg's constructions. If you have any insight into what "human pressures on the coastal fringe" is implying I'd gladly appreciate it.SRW wrote:How is it, realistically, that the Gold Coast places pressure on Glenelg? I don't see that connection at all.
Glenelg : A Beach too far
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
Today's Guardian Messenger has an article on that very point.AG wrote:Human pressures on the coastal fringe would be trying to make you think and consider about how various human uses for the coast (eg. residential and recreational uses) have an impact on the natural coastal processes such as beach erosion, longshore drift and the building and clearing of sand dunes that naturally build up behind where beaches form.gizmo wrote:It's the part that is most difficult in my essay. I just took it as Gold Coast, an expanding beachside city can be compared to Glenelg and therefore doesn't want to fall behind in its urbanization. I'm sure Henley Beach and Port Adelaide experienced pressure from Glenelg's constructions. If you have any insight into what "human pressures on the coastal fringe" is implying I'd gladly appreciate it.SRW wrote:How is it, realistically, that the Gold Coast places pressure on Glenelg? I don't see that connection at all.
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
Online version? Don't think it's on the site.Omicron wrote:Today's Guardian Messenger has an article on that very point.
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
No idea. Kick your newsboy and ask for a copy.gizmo wrote:Online version? Don't think it's on the site.Omicron wrote:Today's Guardian Messenger has an article on that very point.
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
If I lived in Glenelg.Omicron wrote:No idea. Kick your newsboy and ask for a copy.gizmo wrote:Online version? Don't think it's on the site.Omicron wrote:Today's Guardian Messenger has an article on that very point.
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
Oh well - just kick him anyway. Do you know anyone in the Guardian area who could save a copy for you?gizmo wrote:If I lived in Glenelg.Omicron wrote:No idea. Kick your newsboy and ask for a copy.gizmo wrote:
Online version? Don't think it's on the site.
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
You can buy it at the newsagent for 50c.
Or I may choose to scan it later.
Or I may choose to scan it later.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
Who pays for the Messenger? I know it has 50c written on it but everyone who missed it on their driveway picks one up for free at Foodland.Norman wrote:You can buy it at the newsagent for 50c.
Or I may choose to scan it later.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
You pay for it in your council ratesmonotonehell wrote:Who pays for the Messenger? I know it has 50c written on it but everyone who missed it on their driveway picks one up for free at Foodland.Norman wrote:You can buy it at the newsagent for 50c.
Or I may choose to scan it later.
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
I don't think councils pay for it. The pages and pages of ads pay for it.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
I'm sure that Adam's right, the local paper networks are run as a business by News Limited. Fairfax runs a similar set of local papers in competition to News Limited over in Melbourne.AtD wrote:I don't think councils pay for it. The pages and pages of ads pay for it.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
Like "MX" in Sydney/Melbourne/Brisbane, News Ltd's collection of right-wing propaganda, sensationalist ranting, stuff stolen from the internet, and ads!
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
1) bustling yet relaxed, a great place to gather with nice sense of community. In the summer months it does not shut at 5pm (some shops might shut, but the people stay!)gizmo wrote:BTW I sent out emails to real estate agencies asking a few questions, got none back. So I thought I'd pose the questions to residents and others on here.
1) Why do you think people live in Glenelg?
2) Do you believe coastal house prices are too high and are now excluding people who cannot afford them?
3) Do you think Glenelg becoming a city as such on the beach, that it has lost its beach lifestyle and historicalness?
2) Yes, coastal housing prices are high, but that is to be expected. Glenelg actually helps more people realise their dream of living by the beach simply by increasing density. Compare house prices anywhere near the Adelaide coastline to many Glenelg apartment prices. Also, you might want to rephrase the 2nd half of your question - housing is always too expensive if you can't afford it!
3) Yes - if you are the type of person who wants glenelg to be the same as every other beach along the Adelaide coastline (not me). No - i like the type of beach lifestyle offered by glenelg, and feel its sense of history has been retained, just look at all the great old shop fronts and federation style housing scattered through the suburb.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 3:19 pm
- Location: North Adelaide
- Contact:
Re: Glenelg : A Beach to far
You noticed that as well? I actually tried to pull the apostrophe off, but it's not a normal sticker, so I'll have to go back with white out. As for the rest of the sign... I'll just accept that, like the Parklands, English is not something everyone wants to preserve.monotonehell wrote: And now I see this out side the train station:
Not only do they abuse the apostrophe but... WTF? How do I get my taxi "sign posted" so I can do a U-Turn? I could send that to one of those Chinese-English websites and they'd post it.
Phillistines.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 3:19 pm
- Location: North Adelaide
- Contact:
Re: Glenelg : A Beach too far
Oh, and now to report on how I feel about Glenelg:
I have started a thread testing the waters on my suggestion to move the casino to a waterfront location at Glenelg. I think, as long as it is confined to the suburb of Glenelg, further highrise building will help more than it hurts. I do in fact want a second city in Glenelg, with its own high-rise offices, perhaps a theatre and a high-rise car park. More apartments and making Jetty Road a Mall for tram and foot traffic only is also a suggestion.
Obviously this is SA's oldest settlement and there are buildings and streetscapes that must be protected at all costs, but by and large, I'm all for ultra-development in Glenelg, including a casino, a ferry to Kingscote and a train to the airport, among other plans. I can see Glenelg being similar to Naples (without the rubbish), Nice or Majorca.
And we must be cautious that the other suburban beaches stay suburban- esplanade views, bungalow houses, ice-cream kiosks and jetties. The Port, on the other hand, could develop its character more. If prostitution is legalised (I can't get a straight answer from anyone I ask) it should be centred around the Port for historic reasons. A fish market, more investment in the history of the area- lighthouse and museum, for example, as well as retaining the warehouse character of the surrounding districts should be priorities.
But Glenelg- gung-ho!
I have started a thread testing the waters on my suggestion to move the casino to a waterfront location at Glenelg. I think, as long as it is confined to the suburb of Glenelg, further highrise building will help more than it hurts. I do in fact want a second city in Glenelg, with its own high-rise offices, perhaps a theatre and a high-rise car park. More apartments and making Jetty Road a Mall for tram and foot traffic only is also a suggestion.
Obviously this is SA's oldest settlement and there are buildings and streetscapes that must be protected at all costs, but by and large, I'm all for ultra-development in Glenelg, including a casino, a ferry to Kingscote and a train to the airport, among other plans. I can see Glenelg being similar to Naples (without the rubbish), Nice or Majorca.
And we must be cautious that the other suburban beaches stay suburban- esplanade views, bungalow houses, ice-cream kiosks and jetties. The Port, on the other hand, could develop its character more. If prostitution is legalised (I can't get a straight answer from anyone I ask) it should be centred around the Port for historic reasons. A fish market, more investment in the history of the area- lighthouse and museum, for example, as well as retaining the warehouse character of the surrounding districts should be priorities.
But Glenelg- gung-ho!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests