Budget fall out for SA

Anything goes here.. :) Now with Beer Garden for our smoking patrons.
Message
Author
mutt
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:46 pm

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#16 Post by mutt » Fri May 11, 2012 12:39 pm

its pretty close, at Burswood
i understand they're building it on a golf course

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3620
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#17 Post by Waewick » Fri May 11, 2012 1:00 pm

it is only 5kms from the Perth CBD and a 5 minute drive.

AO is 500m from the Adelaide CBD and a 5 minute Walk.

I know which one I prefer.

Will be interesting if we can ever upgrade it.

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#18 Post by skyliner » Fri May 11, 2012 1:21 pm

reference was in the Budget about the Torrens/Goodwood rail project - getting - I think - $232m - what is this all about?

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
Jack.

mutt
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:46 pm

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#19 Post by mutt » Fri May 11, 2012 1:47 pm

Waewick wrote:it is only 5kms from the Perth CBD and a 5 minute drive.

AO is 500m from the Adelaide CBD and a 5 minute Walk.

I know which one I prefer.

Will be interesting if we can ever upgrade it.
its not 5km. look at a map. its even closer than Subiaco.
its around the same distance as AO is to the CBD.

there's a lot of fact bending on this forum to suit agendas it seems

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3620
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#20 Post by Waewick » Fri May 11, 2012 1:58 pm

there is no way it is as close to the Adelaide CBD as AO

don't get me wrong, what Perth is doing is fantasic. But it is only going to be superior to AO in terms of capacity.

well that is my opinion without knowing what additional stadium perks it will have, given it will be completed 3 years later.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7478
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#21 Post by Ben » Fri May 11, 2012 2:03 pm

mutt wrote:
Waewick wrote:it is only 5kms from the Perth CBD and a 5 minute drive.

AO is 500m from the Adelaide CBD and a 5 minute Walk.

I know which one I prefer.

Will be interesting if we can ever upgrade it.
its not 5km. look at a map. its even closer than Subiaco.
its around the same distance as AO is to the CBD.

there's a lot of fact bending on this forum to suit agendas it seems
I used to live in Perth and Burswood is a good 5 - 10 mins drive from the CBD on a good day. Subiaco isn't THAT close to Perth CBD? Thats like me saying Adelaide Oval is closer to the city than AAMI... well duh

mutt
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:46 pm

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#22 Post by mutt » Fri May 11, 2012 2:14 pm

Ben wrote:
mutt wrote:
Waewick wrote:it is only 5kms from the Perth CBD and a 5 minute drive.

AO is 500m from the Adelaide CBD and a 5 minute Walk.

I know which one I prefer.

Will be interesting if we can ever upgrade it.
its not 5km. look at a map. its even closer than Subiaco.
its around the same distance as AO is to the CBD.

there's a lot of fact bending on this forum to suit agendas it seems
I used to live in Perth and Burswood is a good 5 - 10 mins drive from the CBD on a good day. Subiaco isn't THAT close to Perth CBD? Thats like me saying Adelaide Oval is closer to the city than AAMI... well duh
it'd be 2km at most to the golf course. i'm talking about from East Perth, with is basically CBD these days
i cant account for traffic conditions
Last edited by mutt on Fri May 11, 2012 2:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#23 Post by Wayno » Fri May 11, 2012 2:17 pm

skyliner wrote:reference was in the Budget about the Torrens/Goodwood rail project - getting - I think - $232m - what is this all about?
over here matey. $232m is Fed Govt contribution to the total $443m cost.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#24 Post by jk1237 » Fri May 11, 2012 2:33 pm

mutt wrote: So the Liberal party in SA is not releasing any of their policies, because they don't want the Labor government to steal them? generally the opposition release the majority of their policies just prior to elections. this is basic common sense. something that seems to be lacking in your case.
i suppose you think debt is a good thing too. typical attitude of Labor supporters
mutt, your moronic, negative, political posts belong on Adelaidenow. Go post there

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3620
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#25 Post by Waewick » Fri May 11, 2012 2:40 pm

aren't the elections 2 years to go?
Last edited by Waewick on Fri May 11, 2012 3:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#26 Post by skyliner » Fri May 11, 2012 2:51 pm

Wayno wrote:
skyliner wrote:reference was in the Budget about the Torrens/Goodwood rail project - getting - I think - $232m - what is this all about?
over here matey. $232m is Fed Govt contribution to the total $443m cost.
OOps! Sorry mate - did not look there - thanks!

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
Jack.

cruel_world00
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:54 am

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#27 Post by cruel_world00 » Fri May 11, 2012 3:17 pm

Let's compare and contrast.

Perth:
http://maps.google.com.au/maps?oe=utf-8 ... CFgQ-A8wAA


Adelaide:
http://maps.google.com.au/maps?oe=utf-8 ... CEQQ-A8wAA


I think I prefer our situation.

dsriggs
Legendary Member!
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:18 am

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#28 Post by dsriggs » Fri May 11, 2012 3:36 pm

cruel_world00 wrote:Let's compare and contrast.

Perth:
http://maps.google.com.au/maps?saddr=Be ... z=15&via=1


Adelaide:
http://maps.google.com.au/maps?oe=utf-8 ... CEQQ-A8wAA


I think I prefer our situation.
Fixed, but yeah ours has a much better location

mutt
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:46 pm

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#29 Post by mutt » Fri May 11, 2012 3:37 pm

jk1237 wrote:
mutt wrote: So the Liberal party in SA is not releasing any of their policies, because they don't want the Labor government to steal them? generally the opposition release the majority of their policies just prior to elections. this is basic common sense. something that seems to be lacking in your case.
i suppose you think debt is a good thing too. typical attitude of Labor supporters
mutt, your moronic, negative, political posts belong on Adelaidenow. Go post there
last bastion of fools is to name call. I think you may fit that profile.
the thread is about the budget, so it is political

mutt
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:46 pm

Re: Budget fall out for SA

#30 Post by mutt » Fri May 11, 2012 3:42 pm

dsriggs wrote:
cruel_world00 wrote:Let's compare and contrast.

Perth:
http://maps.google.com.au/maps?saddr=Be ... z=15&via=1


Adelaide:
http://maps.google.com.au/maps?oe=utf-8 ... CEQQ-A8wAA


I think I prefer our situation.
Fixed, but yeah ours has a much better location
you've chosen the furtherest possible point in the CBD and you've included the road into the golf club. entry to this new stadium will not be that far.
regardless, its beside the point which was that the Perth Stadium, ie the stadium itself is going to have 10,000 more seats, complete new stadium build and it will only cost $100 million more and this is with Perth's inflated construction costs.

The Adelaide Oval redevelopment will actually cost $600 million when you include the Western Stand which is completed already. The point was about the design which is compromised, not by costs but by short sightedness and a willingness to get one stand built ASAP whilst it was known a full redevelopment was on the agenda. The result is a dogs breakfast of uneven stands.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests