[APP] 64 Currie Street | 92m | 25 Levels | QT Hotel/Office

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
rev
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3926
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm
Has thanked: 261 times
Been thanked: 375 times

[APP] Re: APP: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28 Lvls | Hotel

#226 Post by rev » Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:38 pm

AtD wrote:
rev wrote:They should fine developers who pull these stunts.
Why?
Why?
Because it is a form of deceit, it is dishonest?

If they aren't serious about their proposals, why should they be considered at all let alone approved?
If not fine them, impose a bond system.

Do you think these proposals for 100m this 100m that, that don't get off the ground because the developer never had the intention to actually go ahead with it but only wanted to maximize the value of the existing property to make a profit, have a negative or positive effect on Adelaide, on the market, on the populaces psyche, on the image of Adelaide?

The handful of 100m+ proposals we've had over recent times, which never got off the ground, do you think they reinforce the stereotype that nothing happens/changes in Adelaide?
Do you think these failed developments instil confidence and pride in Adelaide?

Wouldn't the increased cost of the property/land limit the potential for another proposal to get off the ground on that site?

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 577 times
Been thanked: 150 times

[APP] Re: APP: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#227 Post by Will » Wed Dec 24, 2014 4:43 pm

We seem to have missed this one.

It appears this one is dead.
Mattioli's $65m price tag for Rendezvous Grand

The Australian |
July 16, 2013 12:00AM


APARTMENT developers may be flocking to Adelaide but Melbourne's Mattioli Group is pulling out, listing for sale two of its prime assets -- the five-star Rendezvous Grand Hotel and a CBD development site -- for a combined price tag of more than $70 million.

The 202-suite Rendezvous Grand, which is operated by Singapore's The Straits Trading Company, is on the market through CBRE Hotels' Wayne Bunz, and will be offered with a lease to The Straits Trading Company, or via vacant possession.

"Several major hotel operators are not presently represented in the Adelaide five-star hotel market," Mr Bunz said.

"On that basis, we expect significant competition between owner-operators keen to gain a foothold in the Adelaide market and a range of local and overseas buyers, including a number of increasingly active Chinese investors."

Up to $65m is expected for the hotel, which returned its owner $4.849m last year and is forecast to return $4.983m this year.

The Mattioli family is also selling a development site fronting 68 Currie Street in Adelaide's heart as it refocuses on its core Melbourne activities.

User avatar
Howie
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4792
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:55 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 41 times

[APP] Re: CAN: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#228 Post by Howie » Wed Dec 24, 2014 4:51 pm

On that basis, we'll update this one to 'cancelled'.

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 371 times
Been thanked: 49 times

[APP] Re: APP: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28 Lvls | Hotel

#229 Post by metro » Wed Dec 24, 2014 6:07 pm

Yeah I saw this coming.
Mants wrote:
crawf wrote:
metro wrote:will be sad if that box down on grenfell st gets built and this hotel proposal doesnt :?
What box?
i'm sure he's referring to the proposal on the site of the Jade Monkey
what a shame :(

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5416
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 178 times
Been thanked: 320 times

[APP] Re: CAN: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#230 Post by crawf » Wed Dec 24, 2014 6:54 pm

I thought it already was cancelled... still a shame though.

I'm sure though another developer will quickly snap up this site. Over 100 metres is needed.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2579
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
Has thanked: 1007 times
Been thanked: 258 times

[APP] Re: CAN: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#231 Post by [Shuz] » Thu Dec 25, 2014 11:20 am

A shame, but it was predictable. The site is prime location though, so I'm sure it'll get snapped up quickly as well.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

pushbutton
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1425
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:01 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 18 times

[APP] Re: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#232 Post by pushbutton » Mon Dec 29, 2014 6:43 am

Far too tall and narrow. If it was at least four times that width it would get away with the height.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2579
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
Has thanked: 1007 times
Been thanked: 258 times

[APP] Re: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#233 Post by [Shuz] » Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:11 am

Please tell me you're joking.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

rev
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3926
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm
Has thanked: 261 times
Been thanked: 375 times

[APP] Re: CAN: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#234 Post by rev » Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:16 am

[Shuz] wrote:A shame, but it was predictable. The site is prime location though, so I'm sure it'll get snapped up quickly as well.
It might get snapped up quickly but lets hope we don't end up with something insignificant.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 6693
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1065 times

[APP] Re: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#235 Post by Ben » Tue May 10, 2016 2:19 pm

Article in today's paper this site was sold last month to a developer.

Spurdo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:20 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 58 times

[APP] Re: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#236 Post by Spurdo » Fri Jun 16, 2017 2:21 pm

Sorry to bump an old thread but Axiom Properties now own this site and are planning a mixed use Hotel/Office building. Last I checked it was going to be about 30,000m2

More Info-http://www.aspecthuntley.com.au/asxdata ... 865943.pdf

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 6693
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1065 times

[APP] Re: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#237 Post by Ben » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:02 pm

some more info about the proposed hotel. Looks about 28 levels.
Attachments
currie1.JPG
currie1.JPG (118.95 KiB) Viewed 2846 times
currie.JPG
currie.JPG (61.07 KiB) Viewed 2846 times

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2579
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
Has thanked: 1007 times
Been thanked: 258 times

[APP] Re: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#238 Post by [Shuz] » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:20 pm

Preferred the old design.

Is this a serious proposal, or just another vision?
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 6693
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1065 times

[APP] Re: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#239 Post by Ben » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:33 pm

Its still early days so the design may change but it will be a serious proposal. I think the above render is not great quality and think it is better than it looks in the above picture.

GrowAdelaide
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 240
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 11:35 am
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 72 times

[APP] Re: 64 Currie Street | 103m | 28lvls | Hotel

#240 Post by GrowAdelaide » Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:02 pm

Surely that existing building is not heritage listed? Why would they keep that façade?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], gnrc_louis, Google [Bot], normh and 8 guests