[CAN] New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5799
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#346 Post by Will » Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:20 am

This development is no longer featured on realestate.com

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#347 Post by ghs » Tue Jan 26, 2016 11:58 am

Can't help but think that this project is dead.

Is it possible for the buyers to pull out ?

serca
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:46 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#348 Post by serca » Tue Jan 26, 2016 6:29 pm

This and light square are pathetic jokes

On a side dig no wonder Tagara went bust - Too many fingers in too many pies

User avatar
Phantom
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 435
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:49 pm
Location: Northern suburbs

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#349 Post by Phantom » Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:15 pm

I'm really sorry, I couldn't help myself, but...
ghs wrote:pull out
serca wrote:finger
Christ, I'm immature.
"Mono, you're a knob. <3"

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#350 Post by monotonehell » Sat Jan 30, 2016 9:04 pm

Phantom wrote:I'm really sorry, I couldn't help myself, but...
ghs wrote:pull out
serca wrote:finger
Christ, I'm immature.
We were all thinking it.



No?


Just me and Phantom then?
:mrgreen:
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

Jaymz
Legendary Member!
Posts: 976
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#351 Post by Jaymz » Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:55 pm

The lack of information provided to buyers thus far has been disappointing to say the least. But to offer a little glimmer of hope, last week all buyers received an email from the Law firm holding the deposits, to says that all (deposit) money is being held in full. They go on to say that due to the large percentage of pre-commitment for this project, the Receiver is currently working with the Financier on a strategy to make it progress.

ml69
Legendary Member!
Posts: 997
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Adelaide SA

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#352 Post by ml69 » Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:05 am

I drove past this site today. Apologies if the question has been answered earlier, but why are there big Watpac signs surrounding the site?

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7480
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#353 Post by Ben » Fri Feb 05, 2016 9:54 am

This could turn out to be like the former Hills site (now Vue). They went bust after construction started. We ended up with something much better. Wonder if it will be the same here. The biggest damage I see this doing though is to people considering purchasing an apartment. This is not going to look good and will turn a lot of people off. Even though they may get their deposits back, they have practically put their lives on hold for years waiting to move in to this place and now it may not even come to light. Same with Palladium. Maybe the government should enforce stricter rules in relation to construction starts. if it has not started by day x you get your money back. I know this is the case now but its always many years away. I'm fairly sure with Kodo their clause is they have to have started construction by June. that is a much more reasonable time frame given it went on sale in November.

realstretts
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 6:39 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#354 Post by realstretts » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:59 am

Yeah the sunset clauses provided to buyers are rather ridiculous, often three years from purchase date.

floplo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:43 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#355 Post by floplo » Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:26 am

realstretts wrote:Yeah the sunset clauses provided to buyers are rather ridiculous, often three years from purchase date.
Are these clauses actually negotiable when you purchase an apartment?

realstretts
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 6:39 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#356 Post by realstretts » Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:31 am

floplo wrote:
realstretts wrote:Yeah the sunset clauses provided to buyers are rather ridiculous, often three years from purchase date.
Are these clauses actually negotiable when you purchase an apartment?
No, it is part of the contract given to all buyers so every one has to agree to the same sunset date. My purchase has begun construction and is tracking to be finished on time but I can understand the frustration for a prject like this where communication is low, sunset clause date is distant and someone (not the buyers) is earning interest on a truckload of money.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3770
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#357 Post by Nathan » Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:35 am

realstretts wrote:
floplo wrote:
realstretts wrote:Yeah the sunset clauses provided to buyers are rather ridiculous, often three years from purchase date.
Are these clauses actually negotiable when you purchase an apartment?
No, it is part of the contract given to all buyers so every one has to agree to the same sunset date. My purchase has begun construction and is tracking to be finished on time but I can understand the frustration for a prject like this where communication is low, sunset clause date is distant and someone (not the buyers) is earning interest on a truckload of money.
Deposits are generally held in trust and the interest earned on it remains part of your deposit.

realstretts
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 6:39 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#358 Post by realstretts » Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:57 am

Nathan wrote:
Deposits are generally held in trust and the interest earned on it remains part of your deposit.
Thanks for that info, I was unawares

Jaymz
Legendary Member!
Posts: 976
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#359 Post by Jaymz » Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:42 pm

Yes, as far as I'm aware, the deposit money should be earning interest in the mean time. Although with current interest rates, would be lucky to be growing more than inflation.

From memory, the sunset clause for this development is mid 2018, a long way away yet. Although you would hope there would be some kind of result either way well before that time.

On the flip side to long sunset clauses, I have read a true account of worst case scenario on a short sunset clause. A Melbourne developer had a short sunset clause on their project....... in the mean time Melbourne apartment demand (and prices) had risen quite rapidly. The developer was the one to then enact the sunset clause, enabling them to then re-sell the apartments at a higher price. While it was probably within the rules, it's far from ethical.

Dvious
Legendary Member!
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:46 pm

[CAN] Re: New Mayfield | 41-61m | 11-17lvls | Mixed Use

#360 Post by Dvious » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:45 pm

Website is now dead.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 74 guests