[PRO] Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
Blimp
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:36 pm
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 18 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#31 Post by Blimp » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:56 pm

I received a flyer in the mail regarding this one. They're pushing it as 'Fine Retirement Living', with the bulk of it being serviced apartments.

They're taking bookings for those interested in viewing detailed plans during May/June. Doesn't have any current sales/pre-commitment sales present though.

YellowRoad
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:04 am
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 18 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#32 Post by YellowRoad » Wed Mar 01, 2017 7:09 am

49 Brougham place has been put on the market (can find on realcommericial). Is being sold w/ approval for an 11 storey tower. Havent seen any recent advertising after they were advertising alot mid 2016. RIP?

User avatar
wilkiebarkid
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 501
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 134 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#33 Post by wilkiebarkid » Thu Mar 09, 2017 9:40 pm

YellowRoad wrote:49 Brougham place has been put on the market (can find on realcommericial). Is being sold w/ approval for an 11 storey tower. Havent seen any recent advertising after they were advertising alot mid 2016. RIP?
It's called the NORTH ADELAIDE CURSE!

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 6774
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 279 times
Been thanked: 1117 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#34 Post by Ben » Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:44 am

Looks like this is still alive
Type: Schedule 10
Application Number: S10/54/2015/A
Lodgement Date: 07/09/2017
Location: 48-51 Brougham Place, NORTH ADELAIDE SA 5006
Description: Vary previous authorisation the demolition of existing buildings and the construction of a mixes use development comprising of the following: a) Three towers for retirement living with ground level cafe and wellness centre b) A tower for serviced apartments with ground level retail, cafe and restaurant land uses c) Basement carparking and site works d) Works affecting State and Local heritage places - VARIATION - demolition of heritage building to create new porte cochere on Ward Street, change the use from retirement living to residential apartments with changes to layout of apartments.

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1573
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 63 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#35 Post by ghs » Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:22 pm

Another retirement village. It's not a bad business here in Adelaide as the city is full of old people lol.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3143
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Has thanked: 195 times
Been thanked: 621 times
Contact:

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#36 Post by Nathan » Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:03 pm

ghs wrote:
Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:22 pm
Another retirement village. It's not a bad business here in Adelaide as the city is full of old people lol.
DA variations says use is changing away from retirement living to general residential apartments.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5535
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 667 times
Been thanked: 152 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#37 Post by Will » Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:07 pm

ghs wrote:
Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:22 pm
Another retirement village. It's not a bad business here in Adelaide as the city is full of old people lol.
The development application does say to "change from" a retirement village to standard apartments. However, it doesn't surprise me that you would misinterpret reality to validate your negative agenda. Please, just piss off. Adelaide doesn't need people like you.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 6774
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 279 times
Been thanked: 1117 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#38 Post by Ben » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:38 am

The amended plans are now on the DAC website. A builder - Hindmarsh has been appointed and they are keen to get on with stage 1 which is the amended building. Externally it remains largely the same.

https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... ebdocs.pdf

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5699
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
Has thanked: 775 times
Been thanked: 1414 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#39 Post by Norman » Mon Sep 18, 2017 1:50 pm

The treatment of the southern heritage building is much better, I hope the rest of the building goes ahead as well.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5535
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 667 times
Been thanked: 152 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#40 Post by Will » Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:54 am

The most recent amendments to this development were rejected by the DAC. The main reason was that the most recent amnendnents required the demolition of even more heritage aspects of the site, including a 140 year old heritage listed stables.

HiTouch
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm
Has thanked: 221 times
Been thanked: 86 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#41 Post by HiTouch » Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:06 am

Will wrote:
Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:54 am
The most recent amendments to this development were rejected by the DAC. The main reason was that the most recent amnendnents required the demolition of even more heritage aspects of the site, including a 140 year old heritage listed stables.
Good move DAC :applause:
rev wrote:
Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:55 am
If the parklands are so important why dont they put it to a vote state wide? Or are they afraid the majority will back this hotel..

citywatcher
Legendary Member!
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:51 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 64 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#42 Post by citywatcher » Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:24 pm

Good move
Just what you need to buy into a 2017 high rise apartment block
Heritage stables

Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk


HiTouch
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm
Has thanked: 221 times
Been thanked: 86 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#43 Post by HiTouch » Wed Dec 20, 2017 2:51 pm

Every city has heritage stables, we shouldnt be any different in honouring our heritage. Especially if its over 140 years old. We have plenty of areas that can be built on.


Fight me mate, you wouldn't
rev wrote:
Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:55 am
If the parklands are so important why dont they put it to a vote state wide? Or are they afraid the majority will back this hotel..

citywatcher
Legendary Member!
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:51 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 64 times

[PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#44 Post by citywatcher » Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:42 pm

HiTouch wrote:Every city has heritage stables, we shouldnt be any different in honouring our heritage. Especially if its over 140 years old. We have plenty of areas that can be built on.


Fight me mate, you wouldn't
Yeah no worries
You keep your horses houses

Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk


Nort
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1126
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm
Has thanked: 230 times
Been thanked: 144 times

[PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#45 Post by Nort » Wed Dec 20, 2017 4:32 pm

citywatcher wrote:
Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:42 pm
HiTouch wrote:Every city has heritage stables, we shouldnt be any different in honouring our heritage. Especially if its over 140 years old. We have plenty of areas that can be built on.


Fight me mate, you wouldn't
Yeah no worries
You keep your horses houses

Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk
I have sympathy with people who have owned a decrepit or unusable building for years and then get slapped with a heritage listing, but if you buy a site with heritage elements expecting to be given an exemption to preserving them then that is on you 100%.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Algernon, FrankL, Google [Bot], SRW and 12 guests