Page 3 of 8
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:56 pm
by Blimp
I received a flyer in the mail regarding this one. They're pushing it as 'Fine Retirement Living', with the bulk of it being serviced apartments.
They're taking bookings for those interested in viewing detailed plans during May/June. Doesn't have any current sales/pre-commitment sales present though.
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 7:09 am
by YellowRoad
49 Brougham place has been put on the market (can find on realcommericial). Is being sold w/ approval for an 11 storey tower. Havent seen any recent advertising after they were advertising alot mid 2016. RIP?
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 9:40 pm
by wilkiebarkid
YellowRoad wrote:49 Brougham place has been put on the market (can find on realcommericial). Is being sold w/ approval for an 11 storey tower. Havent seen any recent advertising after they were advertising alot mid 2016. RIP?
It's called the NORTH ADELAIDE CURSE!
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:44 am
by Ben
Looks like this is still alive
Type: Schedule 10
Application Number: S10/54/2015/A
Lodgement Date: 07/09/2017
Location: 48-51 Brougham Place, NORTH ADELAIDE SA 5006
Description: Vary previous authorisation the demolition of existing buildings and the construction of a mixes use development comprising of the following: a) Three towers for retirement living with ground level cafe and wellness centre b) A tower for serviced apartments with ground level retail, cafe and restaurant land uses c) Basement carparking and site works d) Works affecting State and Local heritage places - VARIATION - demolition of heritage building to create new porte cochere on Ward Street, change the use from retirement living to residential apartments with changes to layout of apartments.
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:22 pm
by ghs
Another retirement village. It's not a bad business here in Adelaide as the city is full of old people lol.
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:03 pm
by Nathan
ghs wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:22 pm
Another retirement village. It's not a bad business here in Adelaide as the city is full of old people lol.
DA variations says use is changing
away from retirement living to general residential apartments.
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:07 pm
by Will
ghs wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:22 pm
Another retirement village. It's not a bad business here in Adelaide as the city is full of old people lol.
The development application does say to "change from" a retirement village to standard apartments. However, it doesn't surprise me that you would misinterpret reality to validate your negative agenda. Please, just piss off. Adelaide doesn't need people like you.
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:38 am
by Ben
The amended plans are now on the DAC website. A builder - Hindmarsh has been appointed and they are keen to get on with stage 1 which is the amended building. Externally it remains largely the same.
https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... ebdocs.pdf
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 1:50 pm
by Norman
The treatment of the southern heritage building is much better, I hope the rest of the building goes ahead as well.
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:54 am
by Will
The most recent amendments to this development were rejected by the DAC. The main reason was that the most recent amnendnents required the demolition of even more heritage aspects of the site, including a 140 year old heritage listed stables.
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:06 am
by HiTouch
Will wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:54 am
The most recent amendments to this development were rejected by the DAC. The main reason was that the most recent amnendnents required the demolition of even more heritage aspects of the site, including a 140 year old heritage listed stables.
Good move DAC
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:24 pm
by citywatcher
Good move
Just what you need to buy into a 2017 high rise apartment block
Heritage stables
Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk
[U/C] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 2:51 pm
by HiTouch
Every city has heritage stables, we shouldnt be any different in honouring our heritage. Especially if its over 140 years old. We have plenty of areas that can be built on.
Fight me mate, you wouldn't
[U/C] Re: [PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:42 pm
by citywatcher
HiTouch wrote:Every city has heritage stables, we shouldnt be any different in honouring our heritage. Especially if its over 140 years old. We have plenty of areas that can be built on.
Fight me mate, you wouldn't
Yeah no worries
You keep your horses houses
Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk
[U/C] Re: [PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 4:32 pm
by Nort
citywatcher wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:42 pm
HiTouch wrote:Every city has heritage stables, we shouldnt be any different in honouring our heritage. Especially if its over 140 years old. We have plenty of areas that can be built on.
Fight me mate, you wouldn't
Yeah no worries
You keep your horses houses
Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk
I have sympathy with people who have owned a decrepit or unusable building for years and then get slapped with a heritage listing, but if you buy a site with heritage elements expecting to be given an exemption to preserving them then that is on you 100%.