[PRO] Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
Spurdo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:20 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 58 times

[PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#46 Post by Spurdo » Wed Dec 20, 2017 5:14 pm

citywatcher wrote:
Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:42 pm
Yeah no worries
You keep your horses houses

Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk
[/quote]

If that's how it works then shouldn't it be ok to knock down the tram barn at the botanic gardens, after all it's just a tram house or how about the epworth building as its just a c or d grade office building.

Just because it isn't pretty or its past use wasn't attractive or interesting doesn't mean it should be denied heritage listing. (Although obviously not everything deserves to be heritage listed)

citywatcher
Legendary Member!
Posts: 510
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:51 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 63 times

[PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#47 Post by citywatcher » Wed Dec 20, 2017 6:11 pm

Spurdo wrote:
citywatcher wrote:
Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:42 pm
Yeah no worries
You keep your horses houses

Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk
If that's how it works then shouldn't it be ok to knock down the tram barn at the botanic gardens, after all it's just a tram house or how about the epworth building as its just a c or d grade office building.

Just because it isn't pretty or its past use wasn't attractive or interesting doesn't mean it should be denied heritage listing. (Although obviously not everything deserves to be heritage listed)[/quote]You're last paragraph makes hilarious reading


Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk


Ser Noit of Loit
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 220
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 5:12 pm
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 111 times

[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#48 Post by Ser Noit of Loit » Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:02 pm

Some of you guys need to work on linking your quotes properly.

Also Adelaide is a big city (in area) so it's not like we're in dire straights for room and these stables need to be knocked down.

HiTouch
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 84 times

[PRO] Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#49 Post by HiTouch » Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:29 pm

Ser Noit of Loit wrote:
Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:02 pm
Some of you guys need to work on linking your quotes properly.

Also Adelaide is a big city (in area) so it's not like we're in dire straights for room and these stables need to be knocked down.
That’s my point. Adelaide has enough room for both heritage and development. Some areas are more suited to one than the other. Some areas incorporate both and that’s not a bad thing. Brougham place is very much a heritage place with elements of development where Citywest, Grenfell, Franklin certainly have heritage elements but are very much CBD development areas.

It shouldn’t be hard for a developer to respect that. Most cities have this (except maybe the Gold Coast).
rev wrote:
Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:55 am
If the parklands are so important why dont they put it to a vote state wide? Or are they afraid the majority will back this hotel..

Smithy85
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 244
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:31 am
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 19 times

[PRO] Re: Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#50 Post by Smithy85 » Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:28 pm

I think I’ve got the right thread.. Sounds like this is a goer:

https://www.realestate.com.au/news/new- ... aa:article

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 2384
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: City
Has thanked: 531 times
Been thanked: 229 times

[PRO] Re: Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#51 Post by SRW » Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:36 pm

Smithy85 wrote:
Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:28 pm
I think I’ve got the right thread.. Sounds like this is a goer:

https://www.realestate.com.au/news/new- ... aa:article
7 of 18 sold apparently, so indeed hopefully not far off. The article states construction starts this year but I'd be surprised if it starts before middle next.
Keep Adelaide Weird

Sensation.Al
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 3:27 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 1 time

[PRO] Re: Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#52 Post by Sensation.Al » Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:50 pm

I'm not sure if I follow but the 2017 amendments hasn't been approved, but the project is now out for pre-selling. AND construction is expected to start soon (I doubt it'll be this year); :shock: Has this received full development approval at all? Or is there any new amended application lodged? :bow:

retsacerp
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2019 12:10 am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 1 time

[PRO] Re: Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

#53 Post by retsacerp » Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:20 pm

Sensation.Al wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:50 pm
AND construction is expected to start soon (I doubt it'll be this year)
hindmarsh have it out for trade pricing now, closing late october so might start early 2020.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Will and 10 guests