Page 4 of 4

[PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 5:14 pm
by Spurdo
citywatcher wrote:
Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:42 pm
Yeah no worries
You keep your horses houses

Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk
[/quote]

If that's how it works then shouldn't it be ok to knock down the tram barn at the botanic gardens, after all it's just a tram house or how about the epworth building as its just a c or d grade office building.

Just because it isn't pretty or its past use wasn't attractive or interesting doesn't mean it should be denied heritage listing. (Although obviously not everything deserves to be heritage listed)

[PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 6:11 pm
by citywatcher
Spurdo wrote:
citywatcher wrote:
Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:42 pm
Yeah no worries
You keep your horses houses

Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk
If that's how it works then shouldn't it be ok to knock down the tram barn at the botanic gardens, after all it's just a tram house or how about the epworth building as its just a c or d grade office building.

Just because it isn't pretty or its past use wasn't attractive or interesting doesn't mean it should be denied heritage listing. (Although obviously not everything deserves to be heritage listed)[/quote]You're last paragraph makes hilarious reading


Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk


[PRO] Re: [Brougham Place] | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:02 pm
by Ser Noit of Loit
Some of you guys need to work on linking your quotes properly.

Also Adelaide is a big city (in area) so it's not like we're in dire straights for room and these stables need to be knocked down.

[PRO] Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:29 pm
by HiTouch
Ser Noit of Loit wrote:
Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:02 pm
Some of you guys need to work on linking your quotes properly.

Also Adelaide is a big city (in area) so it's not like we're in dire straights for room and these stables need to be knocked down.
That’s my point. Adelaide has enough room for both heritage and development. Some areas are more suited to one than the other. Some areas incorporate both and that’s not a bad thing. Brougham place is very much a heritage place with elements of development where Citywest, Grenfell, Franklin certainly have heritage elements but are very much CBD development areas.

It shouldn’t be hard for a developer to respect that. Most cities have this (except maybe the Gold Coast).

[PRO] Re: Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:28 pm
by Smithy85
I think I’ve got the right thread.. Sounds like this is a goer:

https://www.realestate.com.au/news/new- ... aa:article

[PRO] Re: Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:36 pm
by SRW
Smithy85 wrote:
Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:28 pm
I think I’ve got the right thread.. Sounds like this is a goer:

https://www.realestate.com.au/news/new- ... aa:article
7 of 18 sold apparently, so indeed hopefully not far off. The article states construction starts this year but I'd be surprised if it starts before middle next.

[PRO] Re: Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:50 pm
by Sensation.Al
I'm not sure if I follow but the 2017 amendments hasn't been approved, but the project is now out for pre-selling. AND construction is expected to start soon (I doubt it'll be this year); :shock: Has this received full development approval at all? Or is there any new amended application lodged? :bow:

[PRO] Re: Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:20 pm
by retsacerp
Sensation.Al wrote:
Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:50 pm
AND construction is expected to start soon (I doubt it'll be this year)
hindmarsh have it out for trade pricing now, closing late october so might start early 2020.