[SWP] Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3543
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#526 Post by SRW » Fri Mar 15, 2019 9:37 am

Image is not showing for me? Can anyone repost?
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
Levesque
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 6:23 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#527 Post by Levesque » Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:18 am

SRW wrote:
Fri Mar 15, 2019 9:37 am
Image is not showing for me? Can anyone repost?
Let me know if this helps
New-RAH-concept.PNG

noted
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 5:11 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#528 Post by noted » Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:33 am

The ground level design looks pretty cool, and similar to one of the proposals put forward for the contemporary art gallery. That's where the praise ends unfortunately.

As others have said its early days, so hopefully those shoddy looking cubes are soon forgotten and make way for something with a lot more variation and flair.

User avatar
timtam20292
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1384
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#529 Post by timtam20292 » Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:07 pm

Looks like the buildings are floating.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6387
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#530 Post by Norman » Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:20 pm

That tunnel entrance poses a great opportunity for an entrance to an underground station (bus, tram or train)

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7475
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#531 Post by Ben » Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:33 pm

That is not a proposal. it just an indicative concept. They are seeking expressions of interest now.

EBG
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2932
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:49 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#532 Post by EBG » Fri Mar 15, 2019 5:26 pm

Update 15/3/2019. the old intensive care building has been demolished. (see previous pictures.
Attachments
20190315_lot 14.jpg

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3620
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[SWP] [SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#533 Post by Waewick » Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:35 pm

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sou ... f402142fbc


Aboriginal art and hospitality centrepiece of new $129 million Lot Fourteen funding commitment
Matt Smith, National Affairs Editor, Sunday Mail (SA)
March 16, 2019 9:00pm
Subscriber only

Artists impressions for old RAH innovation hub revealed
Australian Space Agency will be in Adelaide at old RAH site

Premier Steven Marshall’s vision for Adelaide to be home of Australia’s greatest Aboriginal art gallery is set to become a reality with the Federal Government promising to invest $85 million towards the project.

The deal will be unveiled on Sunday as part of a $129 million plan to boost the cultural economy of Adelaide’s world-renowned arts, food and cultural scene under the Adelaide City Deal.

Cities Minister Alan Tudge told the Sunday Mail the projects will boost the cultural economy of South Australia and drive continued visitor growth.

“More visitors means more jobs,” Mr Tudge said.

“This will be a key theme of the city deal which will soon be officially signed by the Prime Minister and Premier.”

Today’s announcement will include funding for

A NEW Aboriginal Art and Cultures Gallery at Lot Fourteen - $85 million

AN International Centre for Food, Hospitality and Tourism at Lot Fourteen - $30 million

A NEW visitor centre at Carrick Hill in Adelaide’s foothills - $3 million

C ONSTRUCTION of The Heysens at Hahndorf, a dynamic arts hub to showcase and celebrate the life and work of Hans and Nora Heysen - $9 million.

DEVELOPMENT of smart technology walking trails at garden and national park tourism sites — $2 million.
Artists impressions of an international school of culinary excellence and a new national Aboriginal Art and Culture Gallery at Lot Fourteen.
Inside the Food Studies building.

Mr Marshall said the funding injection from the Morrison Government will ensure the State Government’s vision for Lot Fourteen is closer to being fully realised.

“Our vision, with the support of the Federal Government, will transform Lot Fourteen into a job generating hub for generations to come, and is yet another example of what can happen when government’s work together to deliver,” Mr Marshall said.

Federal Tourism Minister Simon Birmingham said the funding was evidence that the Federal Liberals believed in South Australia by investing so heavily in job creating projects.

“These investments can guarantee Adelaide is a must visit destination for arts, culture and heritage,” he said.

“We have seen how high quality arts investment like MONA (Hobart’s privately owned contemporary art gallery) has supercharged Tasmania’s tourism industry, with 15 per cent growth in international visitors last year, and we believe the same type of growth is possible in South Australia,” Senator Birmingham said.
Lot Fourteen, former Adelaide Hospital site transformation to technology and creative hub
RELATED CONTENT
A furious man driving, as seen from behind the wheel. - istock
Man with knife ‘punches off-duty cop in road rage episode’
Man with knife ‘punches off-duty cop in road rage episode’
doctor with female patient
Queensland doctors charging more
Queensland doctors charging more

The funding announcement will place pressure on Federal Labor.

Opposition infrastructure spokesman Anthony Albanese has vowed to overhaul the city deal concept if Labor is elected at the Federal Election, expected in May.

But he has also vowed to honour any deals inked before Labor is to come into office.

In December Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced Lot Fourteen would be the home of Australia’s first space agency.

Last week the Federal and State Governments launched an expressions of interest process to design $100 million hub which will be a base for researchers and entrepreneurs at Lot Fourteen.
Not what most here would have been hoping for. Lets hope those artist impressions are miles off.




Spurdo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 246
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:20 pm

[SWP] Re: [SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#534 Post by Spurdo » Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:50 pm

Waewick wrote:
Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:35 pm
Not what most here would have been hoping for. Lets hope those artist impressions are miles off.
Those renders are placeholder images, the same ones used during the election.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3620
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[SWP] Re: [SWP] Re: [SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#535 Post by Waewick » Mon Mar 18, 2019 7:57 am

Spurdo wrote:
Waewick wrote:
Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:35 pm
Not what most here would have been hoping for. Lets hope those artist impressions are miles off.
Those renders are placeholder images, the same ones used during the election.
Saw on Twitter that there had been a call for designs to think big, or words to that effect.

I assume its not another competition.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3543
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#536 Post by SRW » Wed Mar 20, 2019 11:15 am

Can there be two? Advocates for national Indigenous gallery in Central Australia miffed that after 2-and-a-half years of consultation, the Feds gazump them to fund Adelaide gallery that started planning only last month: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-20/ ... y/10917864
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3063
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#537 Post by rhino » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:09 pm

SRW wrote:
Wed Mar 20, 2019 11:15 am
Can there be two?
Image
cheers,
Rhino

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#538 Post by Patrick_27 » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:04 pm

SRW wrote:
Wed Mar 20, 2019 11:15 am
Can there be two? Advocates for national Indigenous gallery in Central Australia miffed that after 2-and-a-half years of consultation, the Feds gazump them to fund Adelaide gallery that started planning only last month: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-20/ ... y/10917864
I don't know why our state government doesn't just ditch the Indigenous gallery/museum and opt for the modern art gallery instead. NT has more claim over such a gallery than we do, a larger indigenous population for one. Secondly, if the state government are charging ahead because they think the idea is unique and that we'll be the only place in Aus and the world to have such a gallery, all it's going to take (as history has shown) is for the gallery to do really well here and then for Melbourne or Sydney to build something the same but ten times bigger and virtually wipe out anything unique about it. At-least with a modern art gallery, it wouldn't be anything new but we could create exhibitions that were unique to our state (which could also include indigenous art). Governments here need to stop playing petty politics and realise when another party had a better idea than there own.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3543
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#539 Post by SRW » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:10 pm

Another article today in InDaily mentioning again the concerns of Indigenous groups in NT and as well as the Kaurna here, but noting the three major state cultural institutions (Library, Museum and Gallery) are collaborating in support of the proposal (though the Gallery in notably couched terms): https://indaily.com.au/news/local/2019/ ... e-gallery/
Keep Adelaide Weird

Jaymz
Legendary Member!
Posts: 968
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#540 Post by Jaymz » Wed Mar 20, 2019 3:04 pm

Patrick_27 wrote:
Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:04 pm
SRW wrote:
Wed Mar 20, 2019 11:15 am
Can there be two? Advocates for national Indigenous gallery in Central Australia miffed that after 2-and-a-half years of consultation, the Feds gazump them to fund Adelaide gallery that started planning only last month: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-20/ ... y/10917864
I don't know why our state government doesn't just ditch the Indigenous gallery/museum and opt for the modern art gallery instead. NT has more claim over such a gallery than we do, a larger indigenous population for one. Secondly, if the state government are charging ahead because they think the idea is unique and that we'll be the only place in Aus and the world to have such a gallery, all it's going to take (as history has shown) is for the gallery to do really well here and then for Melbourne or Sydney to build something the same but ten times bigger and virtually wipe out anything unique about it. At-least with a modern art gallery, it wouldn't be anything new but we could create exhibitions that were unique to our state (which could also include indigenous art). Governments here need to stop playing petty politics and realise when another party had a better idea than there own.
A larger indigenous population by numbers, or a percentage of total population today? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the highest concentration of Indigenous Australians before white settlement stretched from the Adelaide Plains right down to the Fleurieu Peninsula.

As I've mentioned in another thread, the N.T Govt. is pretty much flat broke. After the multi-billion dollar Inpex gas project, there is not much going on there. So unless the Feds fork out for their entire project, they have next to zero chance of getting a gallery of note up and running anytime soon.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 14 guests