[SWP] Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
phenom
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 1:12 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 97 times

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#481 Post by phenom » Mon Dec 17, 2018 5:45 pm

JAKJ wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:05 pm
claybro wrote:
Sat Dec 15, 2018 4:30 pm
Jaymz wrote:
Sat Dec 15, 2018 12:38 pm


Yep and after being the epicentre of the largest boom in Australia's history and squandering most of it, W.A has somehow managed to end up with one of the worst balance sheets in the country.

And now W.A is crying poor to the Feds about tax distribution......sob sob, sniff sniff :cry:
You all do realise how much WA tax has been redistributed to SA in the last decade don't you? Celebrate a win for SA by all means, and there are some good things coming out of SA at present, but really, those comments are a little petty.
WA people have a short memory... prior to around 2007-8 WA was a massive net recipient of Commonwealth fund transfers since Federation, more so than SA inflation adjusted.
In fairness to West Australians, they are fed the same kind of idiotic quality of narrative that we get in the Advertiser from their main paper and it doesn't help that their own Treasury publishes cherry picked dates to make it look like they always got the short straw.

You never hear how the '30c in the dollar' was never that low after other Federal transfers (never went below about 70c net at worst), they conveniently ignore the huge transfers to Tas and NT per head, they ignore that the transfers began purely to assist WA back in the day and of course the WA Govt was silent on the Grants Commission formula (which was known and fixed) until it began working against them - at which time it was 'suddenly' intolerable.

The defence spend is also obviously going to 'leak' massively to other States because there is no way that SA alone has the capability to fulfil all these contracts even with growth and that too is well known to the WA government. However it's much easier to point over to those awful South Australians and call them bludgers than to ask how exactly the WA budget ended up in crisis... maybe they should try selling some government assets and less subsidies of their utilities?

On topic, SA's history of space and rocket research is unquestionable and therefore it's entirely justified that SA should be the site of any space agency. I agree that some kind of space and rocketry museum on the site would be be a major tourist/educational drawcard.

SBD
Legendary Member!
Posts: 716
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 212 times
Been thanked: 62 times

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#482 Post by SBD » Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:08 am

Some of the potential exhibits in a rocketry museum are probably in WA now. The Woomera Instrumented Range went northwest all the way to the coast, so some of the test rockets probably fell to earth there.

Spurdo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:20 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 53 times

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#483 Post by Spurdo » Tue Dec 18, 2018 1:06 am

Went past this site on the weekend and demolition has been completed on the old ED and is currently underway on the former entrance foyer. The demolition shouldn't be too extensive though, as the recent renders of the site indicate that the Theatre & Outpatient buildings are being kept but completely refurbished like the Air Apartments. It will be interesting to see what becomes of not only the massive basement on level 2, but also of the 2/3 levels of service tunnels that run all around the site.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3327
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 97 times

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#484 Post by Waewick » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:25 pm

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-14/ ... s/10713172
t was the grand proposal once mooted as a way to bring Indigenous cultures together from across Australia.

Key points:
Traditional owners have opened up on the family divisions that came about during negotiations
The NT Government revealed last week that the project's future was now under a cloud
Alice Springs town councillor Eli Melky has travelled with two of the traditional owners to Darwin
Now, plans for a National Indigenous Art Gallery in Alice Springs are all but dead and buried, with key traditional owners vetoing their cultural approval last week.
Maybe Marshall knew something that we didn't?

Regards

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests