[COM] Re: 11 Frome Street | 138m | 37 Levels | Crowne Plaza / Adelaidean | New tallest
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2020 9:21 pm
Adelaide's Premier Development and Construction Site
https://sensational-adelaide.com/forum/
There is no such thing as a moderator on Wikipedia, but it has policies that require sources. It had a reference that said 135m. Is there a public document (not necessarily online, but it helps) that says it is 138m (not just approved to be)? Include the reference in your edit and it will stay.
https://invest.cityofadelaide.com.au/bl ... -building/ and https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sou ... 577a87062e say it topped out at 135m. These would be suitable references for WIkipedia to stick with 135m until something else comes out. Is there a 138m press release somewhere?ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:17 pmThis is the appropriate source, but it doesn't specify the height. You could back this up with a press release.
https://www.saplanningportal.sa.gov.au/public_register
They posted it on their insta and I know there was development applications that stated an increased height, but i don’t know.SBD wrote:https://invest.cityofadelaide.com.au/bl ... -building/ and https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sou ... 577a87062e say it topped out at 135m. These would be suitable references for WIkipedia to stick with 135m until something else comes out. Is there a 138m press release somewhere?ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:17 pmThis is the appropriate source, but it doesn't specify the height. You could back this up with a press release.
https://www.saplanningportal.sa.gov.au/public_register
That's why it's not on WIkipedia as 138m - it's in the developer's interest to claim it to be as tall as they can. Wikipedia needs some kind of independent reporting.cmet wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 6:25 pmThey posted it on their insta and I know there was development applications that stated an increased height, but i don’t know.SBD wrote:https://invest.cityofadelaide.com.au/bl ... -building/ and https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sou ... 577a87062e say it topped out at 135m. These would be suitable references for WIkipedia to stick with 135m until something else comes out. Is there a 138m press release somewhere?ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:17 pmThis is the appropriate source, but it doesn't specify the height. You could back this up with a press release.
https://www.saplanningportal.sa.gov.au/public_register
While we are talking of that WIkipedia page, does anyone know of a source for the height (then and now) of the former ETSA building on Greenhill Road? There's been an unanswered question on the talk page for over a year.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:04 pmWikipedia policy is to use only what sources say.
You can add a section to the article's Talk page for registered users to see, so that way the edit could be honoured.
The former ETSA building was built as 2 separate buildings. The front section as built contained only open space offices plus a stair well each end. The rear contained all lifts, air con, toilets and other services. The 2 separate building were connected by glassed in walkways . There was also a live in care takers apartment on the top floor at the rear.SBD wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:08 pmWhile we are talking of that WIkipedia page, does anyone know of a source for the height (then and now) of the former ETSA building on Greenhill Road? There's been an unanswered question on the talk page for over a year.ChillyPhilly wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:04 pmWikipedia policy is to use only what sources say.
You can add a section to the article's Talk page for registered users to see, so that way the edit could be honoured.