[CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 230m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#76 Post by Patrick_27 » Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:59 pm

CDJ wrote:
Tue Aug 15, 2017 4:32 pm
The thread title needs correcting. The stated 230m is above height datum (AHD). This corresponds to height above ground level of approx 195m (PANS-OPS level).

The developer built Aria. U2 is now under construction. I would regard them as having more credibility than most developers in Adelaide. I am working on this project. I'm confident that the developer will build on this site and it will be the tallest building in Adelaide.

I assume Rev's 'comment' is an attempt to provoke me into releasing images. There is zero chance of this. Everything is strictly confidential until it goes in for DA, which should be soon.
It's all well and good to tells us this but your detailing is all so vague. What harm would there be in at-least telling us a rough time when we will see this go before the DAC?

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3210
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 230m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#77 Post by [Shuz] » Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:07 pm

Definitely is the Flinders 123 site.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Adelaidean
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 9:37 pm

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 230m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#78 Post by Adelaidean » Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:12 pm

[Shuz] wrote:
Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:07 pm
Definitely is the Flinders 123 site.
What makes you say that?

serca
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:46 pm

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 230m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#79 Post by serca » Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:29 pm

Both Aria and U2 are not award winning designs but they both look good enough , especially U2 - and time will tell. So hopefully this comes to fruition and the design is of better quality again. I all for height but I would rather a 195m tower than a 230m tower in the near future.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3210
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 230m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#80 Post by [Shuz] » Wed Aug 16, 2017 8:14 am

For the umpteenth time... it is a 190m tall tower. 230m is the AHD. The thread title really needs to be changed.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

User avatar
Algernon
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:46 pm
Location: Moravia

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#81 Post by Algernon » Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:00 pm

Close this damn thread until there is something more than a thought bubble on some random's website

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#82 Post by Patrick_27 » Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:52 pm

Algernon wrote:
Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:00 pm
Close this damn thread until there is something more than a thought bubble on some random's website
I agree, especially if people are going to keep bumping it over nothing.

User avatar
Pants
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1284
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Back Home

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#83 Post by Pants » Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:23 pm

Nah. It's more than a pipe dream. It'll at least get to proposal stage and we've had plenty of those go nowhere, so even if it does all turn to crap, it's worth a thread.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3210
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#84 Post by [Shuz] » Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:31 pm

Of noteworthy importance too, I understand the Feds are currently in the midst of reviewing airspace regulations nationwide. Fingers crossed this translates into some positive outcomes concerning PANS-OPS limitations.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Adelaidean
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 9:37 pm

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#85 Post by Adelaidean » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:42 pm

[Shuz] wrote:
Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:31 pm
Of noteworthy importance too, I understand the Feds are currently in the midst of reviewing airspace regulations nationwide. Fingers crossed this translates into some positive outcomes concerning PANS-OPS limitations.
Mhmm, tell me more.

Spurdo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 247
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:20 pm

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#86 Post by Spurdo » Wed Nov 01, 2017 8:59 pm

I think its probably now time to ask if our insider is able to give us a bit more information about this project

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2165
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#87 Post by Nort » Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:21 pm

Spurdo wrote:
Wed Nov 01, 2017 8:59 pm
I think its probably now time to ask if our insider is able to give us a bit more information about this project
>.>

Got me all excited with the bump for nothing.

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#88 Post by Patrick_27 » Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:57 pm

Can people stop bumping these unless they actually have information? Incredibly annoying.

CDJ
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 2:30 pm

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#89 Post by CDJ » Thu Nov 02, 2017 1:41 pm

Since it's been bumped by others, I'll take the opportunity to provide an update. I've been refraining from commenting due to the response I received earlier in the thread. It should be obvious to a sensible person why a professional can't divulge project images or specific details prior to planning submission, especially for a project of this scale.

The design competition concluded two weeks ago and the successful design team has been selected. It's a joint team of two respected architectural firms with a great track record locally and nationally, along with a team of experienced tall buildings engineers. The team have achieved an elegant design which will be a fitting tallest building for our city. The project is now focused on the approvals phase ahead. The proposed 195m height (i.e. up to PANS-OPS) obviously presents challenges from a planning perspective, but the project has significant support from key people in our city.

Suggest renaming thread as 207 Pulteney St as the 'Dominator' name is being dropped.

YellowRoad
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:04 am

[CAN] Re: DOMINATOR 1 | CBD | 190m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use

#90 Post by YellowRoad » Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:37 pm

CDJ wrote:
Thu Nov 02, 2017 1:41 pm
Since it's been bumped by others, I'll take the opportunity to provide an update. I've been refraining from commenting due to the response I received earlier in the thread. It should be obvious to a sensible person why a professional can't divulge project images or specific details prior to planning submission, especially for a project of this scale.

The design competition concluded two weeks ago and the successful design team has been selected. It's a joint team of two respected architectural firms with a great track record locally and nationally, along with a team of experienced tall buildings engineers. The team have achieved an elegant design which will be a fitting tallest building for our city. The project is now focused on the approvals phase ahead. The proposed 195m height (i.e. up to PANS-OPS) obviously presents challenges from a planning perspective, but the project has significant support from key people in our city.

Suggest renaming thread as 207 Pulteney St as the 'Dominator' name is being dropped.
Very interesting. Thanks for sharing what you can!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 9 guests