News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
Nort
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1333
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm
Has thanked: 313 times
Been thanked: 182 times

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#616 Post by Nort » Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:31 am

bits wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:26 pm
Tea Tree Gully managed to build new a 50m pool, large warm water pool, toddlers pool and associated interactive water features, admin building, plant room, plant equipment, 3 water slides, change rooms - for $10 million in Dec 2010 on ~26,000sqm.

ACC is corrupt to suggest it would cost $60 million to do similar.
Are you referring to Waterworld, the outdoor facility not usable year round?

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 2814
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: City
Has thanked: 770 times
Been thanked: 384 times

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#617 Post by SRW » Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:30 am

bits wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:26 pm
Tea Tree Gully managed to build new a 50m pool, large warm water pool, toddlers pool and associated interactive water features, admin building, plant room, plant equipment, 3 water slides, change rooms - for $10 million in Dec 2010 on ~26,000sqm.

ACC is corrupt to suggest it would cost $60 million to do similar.
Corrupt? That's a big word to be bandying about with no cause.

Given it was estimated to cost $11 million to just demolish the place, there's probably a few factors influencing cost above those of a greenfield development.

But I do think, if you're spending as much as $60 million, it may be worth going the whole hog and building to FINA standard. (Although, I would rather another location.)
Keep Adelaide Weird

Nort
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1333
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm
Has thanked: 313 times
Been thanked: 182 times

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#618 Post by Nort » Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:35 am

SRW wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:30 am
bits wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:26 pm
Tea Tree Gully managed to build new a 50m pool, large warm water pool, toddlers pool and associated interactive water features, admin building, plant room, plant equipment, 3 water slides, change rooms - for $10 million in Dec 2010 on ~26,000sqm.

ACC is corrupt to suggest it would cost $60 million to do similar.
Corrupt? That's a big word to be bandying about with no cause.

Given it was estimated to cost $11 million to just demolish the place, there's probably a few factors influencing cost above those of a greenfield development.

But I do think, if you're spending as much as $60 million, it may be worth going the whole hog and building to FINA standard. (Although, I would rather another location.)
If it's going to be funded primarily by the ACC I think it should go along the riverbank precinct.

how good is he
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1135
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:26 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 63 times

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#619 Post by how good is he » Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:51 am

The Aquatic Centre at Marion cost some $100m some 10 years ago. Does anyone know the sq m size of that?
That has a capacity of around 3,500 people. The ACC doesn't say what the capacity is of their 3 potential options, if anyone knows?

floplo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:43 pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#620 Post by floplo » Wed Jun 03, 2020 1:56 pm

The Scooter Guy wrote:Four options on the table for ailing Aquatic Centre

OPTION 1
Would cater for 1.3 million patrons per year.
Sverall size: 26,100sq m
Includes: 50m pool, spectator seating, learn to swim area, large leisure pool, large warm water pool, spa, sauna, steam room, large gym, 520 car parks, program rooms, creche, cafe and service areas.
Cost: $60.2 million

OPTION 2
Would cater for one million patrons
Overall size: 20,700sq m
Includes: 25m pool, learn to swim area, large leisure pool, large warm water pool, spa, sauna, steam room, gym, creche, cafe, program rooms, service area and 400 car parks.
Cost: 49.8 million

OPTION 3
Would cater for 714,000 patrons per year
Overall size: 15,200sq m
Includes: 25m pool, learn to swim area, leisure pool, warm water pool, spa, sauna, steam room, gymnasium, program rooms, creche, cafe, service areas and 286 car parks.
Cost: $38.6 million

OPTION 4
Would cater for 500,000 patrons per year
Overall size: 11,100sq m
Includes: 25m pool, toddler and learn to swim pool, small warm water pool, spa, gym, program rooms, children’s area cafe, service areas and 200 car parks.
Cost: $29.5 million

More: https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/messenge ... 4MFuVT36Ig

For me, I pick OPTION 1!
Keep it closed till they find someone else to pay for it, anything in those magnitudes is just a white elephant for the ACC


Sent from my LG-H870DS using Tapatalk


User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 2814
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: City
Has thanked: 770 times
Been thanked: 384 times

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#621 Post by SRW » Wed Jun 03, 2020 4:43 pm

Nort wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:35 am
SRW wrote:
Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:30 am
bits wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 8:26 pm
Tea Tree Gully managed to build new a 50m pool, large warm water pool, toddlers pool and associated interactive water features, admin building, plant room, plant equipment, 3 water slides, change rooms - for $10 million in Dec 2010 on ~26,000sqm.

ACC is corrupt to suggest it would cost $60 million to do similar.
Corrupt? That's a big word to be bandying about with no cause.

Given it was estimated to cost $11 million to just demolish the place, there's probably a few factors influencing cost above those of a greenfield development.

But I do think, if you're spending as much as $60 million, it may be worth going the whole hog and building to FINA standard. (Although, I would rather another location.)
If it's going to be funded primarily by the ACC I think it should go along the riverbank precinct.
I think a state aquatic sports park, perhaps including facilities for rowing or even a surfing wave pool, would be cool for the former railways land west of Victoria Bridge currently occupied by car parks, boatsheds, and unused lawn.
Keep Adelaide Weird

bits
Legendary Member!
Posts: 660
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:24 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 122 times

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#622 Post by bits » Sat Jun 06, 2020 7:01 pm


Nort wrote: Are you referring to Waterworld, the outdoor facility not usable year round?
Yes.
Surely a roof, gym and spa is not worth $50 million.
Also why must it be year round and with a roof.
Where is the options of roof less?

ml69
Legendary Member!
Posts: 934
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Adelaide SA
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#623 Post by ml69 » Sat Jun 06, 2020 10:43 pm

bits wrote:
Sat Jun 06, 2020 7:01 pm
Nort wrote: Are you referring to Waterworld, the outdoor facility not usable year round?
Yes.
Surely a roof, gym and spa is not worth $50 million.
Also why must it be year round and with a roof.
Where is the options of roof less?
Cos you don’t want it closed for 7 months a year when the weather is too cold to swim as many suburban pools are.

In relation to the wave pool, that could be a real hit to set this pool apart from the numerous other enclosed pools in Adelaide. Doesn’t have to be a surfing wave pool. Having been to wave pools in Japan and Singapore, my kids absolutely love it and we would be definite customers if this rebuilt facility offered one!

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1982
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
Been thanked: 270 times

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#624 Post by Patrick_27 » Sun Jun 07, 2020 1:08 am

ml69 wrote:
Sat Jun 06, 2020 10:43 pm
bits wrote:
Sat Jun 06, 2020 7:01 pm
Nort wrote: Are you referring to Waterworld, the outdoor facility not usable year round?
Yes.
Surely a roof, gym and spa is not worth $50 million.
Also why must it be year round and with a roof.
Where is the options of roof less?
Cos you don’t want it closed for 7 months a year when the weather is too cold to swim as many suburban pools are.

In relation to the wave pool, that could be a real hit to set this pool apart from the numerous other enclosed pools in Adelaide. Doesn’t have to be a surfing wave pool. Having been to wave pools in Japan and Singapore, my kids absolutely love it and we would be definite customers if this rebuilt facility offered one!
I look at how MSAC works in Melbourne, they've incorporated the more niche indoor sports (badminton, table tennis, squash etc) as well as basketball into a giant facility alongside the swimming centre, I don't think we should do that. But MSAC also have a massive gym attached, and they've got the balance right of offering family/children pools/entertainment whilst offering facilities for the more serious swimmers. I wonder if Memorial Drive were to be redeveloped and result in Next Gen having to relocate whether the ACC could create a facilities that could be owned by the council but co-operated and partially funded by Next Gen. This could be a way of increasing the revenue stream and bringing in a new clientele.

back86
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:51 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#625 Post by back86 » Mon Jun 15, 2020 10:45 pm

I hope the city of Adelaide do something about the aquatic centre there

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests