News & Discussion: General CBD Development

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7480
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2101 Post by Ben » Fri Feb 10, 2017 10:23 am

ghs wrote:Now I've seen a few funny things on this website and I am happy to admit that some of my comments in the past
have been controversial. But 'Dominator 1' as a name and with a height of 230 metres is ridiculous. Datong are a joke.
Adelaide doesn't have an economy to support a building of that height.
That is the project name, not the name of the apartments and secondly are you an economist?

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2102 Post by ghs » Fri Feb 10, 2017 10:29 am

Mate, I am not an economist. How could a business justify a development of that height when
we haven't had anything more then 132 metres over the last 35 years ?

Goodsy
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1100
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2103 Post by Goodsy » Fri Feb 10, 2017 10:29 am

ghs wrote:Now I've seen a few funny things on this website and I am happy to admit that some of my comments in the past
have been controversial. But 'Dominator 1' as a name and with a height of 230 metres is ridiculous. Datong are a joke.
Adelaide doesn't have an economy to support a building of that height.
They obviously know more about Adelaide's economy than you... Do you seriously think they just guess and then hope there will be a demand for it once it's been built?

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7480
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2104 Post by Ben » Fri Feb 10, 2017 10:33 am

ghs wrote:Mate, I am not an economist. How could a business justify a development of that height when
we haven't had anything more then 132 metres over the last 35 years ?
Oh so your basing your prediction on no economic basis whatsoever...interesting.

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2073
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2105 Post by Llessur2002 » Fri Feb 10, 2017 10:40 am

Is there a height where building becomes significantly more expensive? Is it less than 230m?

Otherwise, I can't see how the economy wouldn't support a 230m building when apparently it'll happily support several 100m+ buildings...

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2106 Post by ghs » Fri Feb 10, 2017 10:57 am

GoodSmackUp wrote:
ghs wrote:Now I've seen a few funny things on this website and I am happy to admit that some of my comments in the past
have been controversial. But 'Dominator 1' as a name and with a height of 230 metres is ridiculous. Datong are a joke.
Adelaide doesn't have an economy to support a building of that height.
They obviously know more about Adelaide's economy than you... Do you seriously think they just guess and then hope there will be a demand for it once it's been built?
It's fair to say that Datong / JWDT doesn't have much integrity given what has happened with U2 on Waymouth.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7480
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2107 Post by Ben » Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:05 am

ghs wrote: It's fair to say that Datong / JWDT doesn't have much integrity given what has happened with U2 on Waymouth.
Once again do you know the story behind the delay at U2? You're very quick to jump and make accusations without research or fact.

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2108 Post by ghs » Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:09 am

Ben wrote:
ghs wrote: It's fair to say that Datong / JWDT doesn't have much integrity given what has happened with U2 on Waymouth.
Once again do you know the story behind the delay at U2? You're very quick to jump and make accusations without research or fact.
Yes I know the story behind U2. They said that construction had started 18 months ago and still to this day, nothing has happened.
Interesting enough if you were to go back through the U2 thread, you will find that I was the only one on the forum who successfully
predicted that nothing will happen.
Last edited by ghs on Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2109 Post by Norman » Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:12 am

I also remember something about a "Valley of Death" prediction.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7480
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2110 Post by Ben » Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:15 am

We know what has and has not happened, what we do not know is WHY. Without this knowledge it is irresponsible to throw around accusations and assumptions.

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2111 Post by ghs » Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:25 am

Norman wrote:I also remember something about a "Valley of Death" prediction.
I was correct with that prediction also. There was a dip in the number of cranes on the skyline at the
end of last year and we are now on the way back up.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2112 Post by Norman » Fri Feb 10, 2017 12:00 pm

ghs wrote:
Norman wrote:I also remember something about a "Valley of Death" prediction.
I was correct with that prediction also. There was a dip in the number of cranes on the skyline at the
end of last year and we are now on the way back up.
I wouldn't call what we had a "Valley of Death" though. What was it, a reduction in 1, 2, 3 cranes?

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5523
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2113 Post by crawf » Fri Feb 10, 2017 12:16 pm

ghs wrote:
Norman wrote:I also remember something about a "Valley of Death" prediction.
I was correct with that prediction also. There was a dip in the number of cranes on the skyline at the
end of last year and we are now on the way back up.
No you weren't correct. Your definitely of a "valley of death" seems to be very different compared to everyone else on this forum.

If anything we reached a so called "valley of death" last decade or the 90s.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3211
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2114 Post by [Shuz] » Fri Feb 10, 2017 2:35 pm

At 230m, the building has to be in the south east corner of the city - I'm talking like near Calvary Hospital area. AAL / CASA wouldn't allow it otherwise.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3770
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

#2115 Post by Nathan » Fri Feb 10, 2017 2:42 pm

[Shuz] wrote:At 230m, the building has to be in the south east corner of the city - I'm talking like near Calvary Hospital area. AAL / CASA wouldn't allow it otherwise.
The jives with the Pulteney/Flinders St corner speculation. Can't be much further south, as they do specify "core".

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Hippodamus, Nort, timtam20292 and 76 guests