[COM] Uno Apartments | 53m | 17lvls | Residential

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
UrbanSG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1848
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:55 am

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#271 Post by UrbanSG » Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:54 pm

Pic taken today:

Image

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#272 Post by jk1237 » Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:37 pm

ok this doesn't look as bad in person, however I must admit I do have a fetish for commie block stuff. I may be alone in saying this, but looking down Bank St from Hindley Street, the urban-nest student towers look so cool imo, I love them. This uno will have more glass on the upper levels too which as shown above hasn't started. So I will wait for the finished product

RayRichards
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Glenelg South

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#273 Post by RayRichards » Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:41 pm

jk1237 wrote:ok this doesn't look as bad in person, however I must admit I do have a fetish for commie block stuff. I may be alone in saying this, but looking down Bank St from Hindley Street, the urban-nest student towers look so cool imo, I love them. This uno will have more glass on the upper levels too which as shown above hasn't started. So I will wait for the finished product
+1

Any photo updates. Fellow shutter bugs?

Ray.

User avatar
Thanial
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:54 pm
Location: Mitcham

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#274 Post by Thanial » Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:40 pm

Sorry to bump the thread but whilst having a quick browse on Emporis I realised that it lists the architectural height of this building as 53m, and roof height as 50, encase one of the moderators finally wanted to add the height to the title! :lol:

Here's the link encase you want to check http://www.emporis.com/building/uno-apa ... -australia

According to the website at least some good will come of of this building
"Of the 138 units, 30 of them will be set aside for homeless youth, and 27 units will be set aside for public housing, low-income earner rental, low-income purchase and for private sale respectively."

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5799
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#275 Post by Will » Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:16 pm

Speaking of this building, today was the topping out ceremony.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3211
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#276 Post by [Shuz] » Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:18 pm

I don't think anyone cares. We're all looking forward to the demolition ceremony in 30 years time. :P
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5799
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#277 Post by Will » Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:26 am

From Sunday March 18:

Image

Image

Image

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5523
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#278 Post by crawf » Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:58 am

This looks so god damn ugly from the west. And to make things worse, this building combined with the blank walls of CC8 and Waymouth Exchange give the impression of one massive continuous ugly blank wall. It really is an eyesore.

User avatar
bm7500
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:04 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#279 Post by bm7500 » Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:10 am

crawf wrote:This looks so god damn ugly from the west. And to make things worse, this building combined with the blank walls of CC8 and Waymouth Exchange give the impression of one massive continuous ugly blank wall. It really is an eyesore.
+1
ADELAIDE SINGAPORE LONDON BERLIN AMSTERDAM PARIS TOKYO AUCKLAND DOHA DUBLIN HONG KONG BANGKOK REYKJAVIK ROME MADRID BUDAPEST COPENHAGEN ZURICH BRUSSELS VIENNA PRAGUE STOCKHOLM LUXEMBOURG BRATISLAVA NASSAU DUBAI BAHRAIN KUALA LUMPUR HELSINKI GENEVA

User avatar
wilkiebarkid
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#280 Post by wilkiebarkid » Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:41 am

Thanial wrote:"Of the 138 units, 30 of them will be set aside for homeless youth, and 27 units will be set aside for public housing, low-income earner rental, low-income purchase and for private sale respectively."

How on earth can such a prime inner City location be used for homeless youth and public housing. That combination = SLUM.

If you bought one before this was announced you'd be mighty pissed off.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5799
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#281 Post by Will » Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:08 am

wilkiebarkid wrote:
Thanial wrote:"Of the 138 units, 30 of them will be set aside for homeless youth, and 27 units will be set aside for public housing, low-income earner rental, low-income purchase and for private sale respectively."

How on earth can such a prime inner City location be used for homeless youth and public housing. That combination = SLUM.

If you bought one before this was announced you'd be mighty pissed off.
This was known beforehand. This is no surprise.

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#282 Post by jk1237 » Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:37 am

wilkiebarkid wrote:
Thanial wrote:"Of the 138 units, 30 of them will be set aside for homeless youth, and 27 units will be set aside for public housing, low-income earner rental, low-income purchase and for private sale respectively."

How on earth can such a prime inner City location be used for homeless youth and public housing. That combination = SLUM.

If you bought one before this was announced you'd be mighty pissed off.
thats quite silly to say. The apartments above the bus station are for low income and some former homeless and I dont see that area full of crime and stabbings and slumness. Infact its better than it used to be. Will be far from a slum

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3067
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#283 Post by rhino » Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:15 pm

jk1237 wrote: slumness
Bravo! Adding this one to my vocabulary as i type. :)
cheers,
Rhino

dsriggs
Legendary Member!
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:18 am

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#284 Post by dsriggs » Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:21 pm

wilkiebarkid wrote:
Thanial wrote:"Of the 138 units, 30 of them will be set aside for homeless youth, and 27 units will be set aside for public housing, low-income earner rental, low-income purchase and for private sale respectively."

How on earth can such a prime inner City location be used for homeless youth and public housing. That combination = SLUM.

If you bought one before this was announced you'd be mighty pissed off.
From the VERY FIRST post in the thread:
The development proposal could include affordable housing for the vulnerable and low-income workers or a 190-apartment complex.

User avatar
wilkiebarkid
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential

#285 Post by wilkiebarkid » Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:06 pm

jk1237 wrote:
wilkiebarkid wrote:
Thanial wrote:"Of the 138 units, 30 of them will be set aside for homeless youth, and 27 units will be set aside for public housing, low-income earner rental, low-income purchase and for private sale respectively."

How on earth can such a prime inner City location be used for homeless youth and public housing. That combination = SLUM.

If you bought one before this was announced you'd be mighty pissed off.
thats quite silly to say. The apartments above the bus station are for low income and some former homeless and I dont see that area full of crime and stabbings and slumness. Infact its better than it used to be. Will be far from a slum
Give it time.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 83 guests