COM: [Glenelg] Bay Junction Shopping Centre | $60m

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#196 Post by Omicron » Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:26 pm

Considering its elitist perception, Burnside Village is particularly underwhelming.

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton

Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#197 Post by ghs » Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:34 pm

I noticed a couple of days ago that this development includes a new car wash on the rooftop car park.
There's car washes starting everywhere in Adelaide at the moment.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#198 Post by monotonehell » Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:56 pm

ghs wrote:I noticed a couple of days ago that this development includes a new car wash on the rooftop car park.
There's car washes starting everywhere in Adelaide at the moment.
Pure speculation but; might that have something to do with the water restrictions at people's households not applying to a commercial carwash?
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#199 Post by AtD » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:22 pm

A few new ones have popped up around Canberra too. I think it's the franchise fad of the moment.

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton

Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#200 Post by ghs » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:37 pm

There is definitely a market in Adelaide for good hand car washes and I think
there will be quite a few more opening over the next couple of years.

People enjoy the luxury of sitting down and having a coffee while other people clean
their car. Also the water restrictions have obviously made it hard for people to wash
their cars at home. Furthermore, those automatic car washes don't do a good job and can
scratch your car.

fkj
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:16 am

Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#201 Post by fkj » Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:00 pm

ghs wrote: Furthermore, those automatic car washes don't do a good job and can
scratch your car.
but the automatic ones are oh so fun, its like going on a ride :D

Hooligan
Legendary Member!
Posts: 888
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:03 pm

Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#202 Post by Hooligan » Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:02 pm

fkj wrote:
ghs wrote: Furthermore, those automatic car washes don't do a good job and can
scratch your car.
but the automatic ones are oh so fun, its like going on a ride :D
hehe yeah. You always feel like your moving in it don't you?

Code: Select all

Signature removed 

fkj
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:16 am

Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#203 Post by fkj » Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:58 pm

maybe thats 'cos you are moving....
it always feels too me like you're going up hill.

Allkai
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 341
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:59 pm

Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#204 Post by Allkai » Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:37 am

baytram366 wrote:The trees are not actually that funny if you think about it.
The reason why they like are that is becuase the Council has deemed these trees significant and refused the developers permission to cut them down. So instead of kicking up a big legal fight with the council, the builders simply built around the trees and are just hoping and waiting for them to die so they then become a hazard and have to be removed.
This makes me quite angry actually...
What is funny is that the trees are now gone.....

WTF?

:roll: :roll:

pushbutton
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1451
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:01 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#205 Post by pushbutton » Thu Feb 25, 2010 8:24 pm

Allkai wrote:
baytram366 wrote:The trees are not actually that funny if you think about it.
The reason why they like are that is becuase the Council has deemed these trees significant and refused the developers permission to cut them down. So instead of kicking up a big legal fight with the council, the builders simply built around the trees and are just hoping and waiting for them to die so they then become a hazard and have to be removed.
This makes me quite angry actually...
What is funny is that the trees are now gone.....

WTF?

:roll: :roll:
Another testiment to Adelaides bizarre and archaic (if perhaps very slowly improving) planning system. Surely it would have made far more sense for the council to simply say
  • "yes, remove the palm trees but relocate them elsewhere on the site", or
    "we'll buy the trees from you and put them somewhere in a public place", or
    "get rid of the trees but you must replace them with an equivelent quantity of alternative landscaping / plants and we need to see your plans for this before we give final approval".
This is a simple, common sense approach and I can't understand why Adelaide councils find it so difficult to apply.

Hippodamus
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:31 pm

Re: #COM: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#206 Post by Hippodamus » Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:16 pm

haha... actually, if you look into it by legal definition, a palm tree is cannot be classified as a tree because it's technical definition is in fact a type of 'grass'.

If the developers did their research, they could have won that fiasco.

User avatar
fishinajar
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 12:23 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #COM: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#207 Post by fishinajar » Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:14 pm

Hippodamus wrote:haha... actually, if you look into it by legal definition, a palm tree is cannot be classified as a tree because it's technical definition is in fact a type of 'grass'.

If the developers did their research, they could have won that fiasco.
Yes I believe a palm "tree" is a monocot. Trees are dicots.
I believe some councils have their own "interpretation". A clash of interpretations would result in threatening action, the chicken dance, and possible legal action. To my knowledge no one has been successfully prosecuted for tree damaging activity to a palm tree yet.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #COM: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#208 Post by Wayno » Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:35 pm

fishinajar wrote:A clash of interpretations would result in threatening action, the chicken dance, and possible legal action.
this made me laugh out loud :lol:
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: #COM: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#209 Post by Omicron » Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:06 pm

So, um, yes. This is a rather unappealing building in person. What a shame.

pushbutton
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1451
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:01 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #COM: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg

#210 Post by pushbutton » Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:40 pm

Could have been much more I agree.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 82 guests