[CAN] 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5937
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
Has thanked: 838 times
Been thanked: 1617 times

Re: 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#76 Post by Norman » Wed Apr 01, 2020 9:21 pm

The site is for sale, so it's still a possibility. But I'm not getting my hopes up, especially during these crazy times.

flat04
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:18 pm
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#77 Post by flat04 » Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:57 am

There's an article on Adelaidenow regarding the State Government possibly buying the site. I'm sorry I don't haves access to the full article.
Le Cornu site on government radar.
It’s one of the biggest development sites on offer near the city. Now there’s speculation the State Government could snap up the Le Cornu site on Anzac Hwy.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: City
Has thanked: 740 times
Been thanked: 369 times

Re: 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#78 Post by SRW » Mon Jun 08, 2020 12:03 pm

Playford used the Housing Trust to underwrite the state's economic expansion in the 40s and 50s. Renewal SA should be supercharged as a development corp to get this state moving again. This site, and several other CBD and inner-city sites, should be booming construction zones for mid-to-high density affordable housing.
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2465
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head
Has thanked: 1216 times
Been thanked: 161 times

Re: 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#79 Post by Ho Really » Mon Jun 08, 2020 11:08 pm

flat04 wrote:
Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:57 am
There's an article on Adelaidenow regarding the State Government possibly buying the site. I'm sorry I don't haves access to the full article.
Le Cornu site on government radar.
It’s one of the biggest development sites on offer near the city. Now there’s speculation the State Government could snap up the Le Cornu site on Anzac Hwy.
Your wish granted...
State Government reportedly in talks to buy old Le Cornu site on Anzac Hwy and abandoned Kaufland site on Churchill Rd
Cameron England, Business Editor, The Messenger
June 8, 2020 5:20pm

The State Government should not be competing with the private sector for prime development sites such as the former Le Cornu site on Anzac Hwy, unless there’s a compelling public interest reason to do so, the Urban Development Institute of Australia says.

UDIA SA chief executive Pat Gerace also said that if the government was seeking to buy the site, and German retailer Kaufland’s other site on Churchill Rd, the cost would run into the tens of millions - money which would be better spent helping new home buyers get into the market.

The State Government is refusing to comment on whether it is in negotiations to buy the two sites.

The selling agent, Colliers International, will not comment on whether the sites remain for sale and Planning Minister Stephan Knoll has declined to comment on the issue.

Sources have told The Advertiser that the government is in talks to buy both sites, which when last sold, were worth $37.5 million, with Kaufland buying the Anzac Hwy site for $25 million and paying $12.5 million for Churchill Rd.

Kaufland bought the former Le Cornu site at Forestville for $25 million three years ago but it was placed on the market earlier this year when the company abandoned its plans for a nationwide rollout of discount supermarkets.

Mr Gerace said the reason for buying the former Le Cornu site was unclear.

“If the government is considering purchasing this site, they would need to have a very convincing case about what the public threshold test, about why they would use government money to compete with the private sector,’’ Mr Gerace said.

“If we’re talking about a residential development to compete with other people who already do that, it doesn’t pass the test for why government should be using taxpayer money.

“I’m not sure what articulated goal the government’s had so far in their term, that points to this decision being consistent with a strategy.’’

Mr Gerace said, assuming a $30 million purchase price for the Anzac Hwy site alone, that amount of money could instead be used to deliver 1200 grants of $25,000 for people looking to get into the housing market.

Property Council SA executive director Daniel Gannon said if there was the opportunity to involve the private sector in any future development it would be welcome.

“Renewal SA has long partnered with private operators to deliver government services, and long may that continue in a productive way,’’ Mr Gannon said.

In March, Adelaide property identity Theo Maras said, while he wouldn’t be the one to build it, a new mixed-use suburb should be built stretching from the Le Cornu site up to the intersection of Anzac Hwy and Greenhill Rd, taking in the Keswick army barracks.

That idea has been enthusiastically backed by Unley Mayor Michael Hewitson.

“We think the area is perfectly situated for a cool, green development, perfectly sited next to the Wayville train station,’’ he said this week.

Mr Hewitson said the council welcome the chance to work on future plans for the site if the government did indeed buy it.

Prospect Mayor David O’Loughlin said his council had spoken with a number of potential users of the Kaufland site on Churchill Rd including the State Government, but was not aware of any pending transaction.

Mr O’Loughlin said the site was well-positioned next to a train station and had flexible zoning, so he hoped to see a creative approach to developing it.

Le Cornu closed its doors on Anzac Hwy in October 2016.

The Messenger
Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: City
Has thanked: 740 times
Been thanked: 369 times

Re: 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#80 Post by SRW » Mon Jun 08, 2020 11:32 pm

Unusually strident words from UDIA. I wonder if someone there is connected to a private bid? Either way, their argument is undone by this statement:
“If we’re talking about a residential development to compete with other people who already do that, it doesn’t pass the test for why government should be using taxpayer money.

“I’m not sure what articulated goal the government’s had so far in their term, that points to this decision being consistent with a strategy.’’

Mr Gerace said, assuming a $30 million purchase price for the Anzac Hwy site alone, that amount of money could instead be used to deliver 1200 grants of $25,000 for people looking to get into the housing market.
So in their estimation, the role of government is not to act as a public interest developer but to subsidise private profiteering? That's almost as noxious an attitude as the Commonwealth's Homebuilder rort.

In any event:
Property Council SA executive director Daniel Gannon said if there was the opportunity to involve the private sector in any future development it would be welcome.

“Renewal SA has long partnered with private operators to deliver government services, and long may that continue in a productive way,’’ Mr Gannon said.
Exactly. Bowden is the template here. The government can determine the standards of design and affordability and partner with the private sector to deliver it.
Keep Adelaide Weird

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1958
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
Been thanked: 267 times

Re: 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#81 Post by Patrick_27 » Tue Jun 09, 2020 12:14 am

SRW wrote:
Mon Jun 08, 2020 11:32 pm
Unusually strident words from UDIA. I wonder if someone there is connected to a private bid? Either way, their argument is undone by this statement:
“If we’re talking about a residential development to compete with other people who already do that, it doesn’t pass the test for why government should be using taxpayer money.

“I’m not sure what articulated goal the government’s had so far in their term, that points to this decision being consistent with a strategy.’’

Mr Gerace said, assuming a $30 million purchase price for the Anzac Hwy site alone, that amount of money could instead be used to deliver 1200 grants of $25,000 for people looking to get into the housing market.
So in their estimation, the role of government is not to act as a public interest developer but to subsidise private profiteering? That's almost as noxious an attitude as the Commonwealth's Homebuilder rort.

In any event:
Property Council SA executive director Daniel Gannon said if there was the opportunity to involve the private sector in any future development it would be welcome.

“Renewal SA has long partnered with private operators to deliver government services, and long may that continue in a productive way,’’ Mr Gannon said.
Exactly. Bowden is the template here. The government can determine the standards of design and affordability and partner with the private sector to deliver it.
I'm not overly concerned with private investors putting forward a bid, saves our government money and will surely fast-track the knock on effect in the surrounding areas like Dudley Park and Islington from all the Churchill Road developments.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: City
Has thanked: 740 times
Been thanked: 369 times

Re: 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#82 Post by SRW » Tue Jun 09, 2020 12:36 am

Patrick_27 wrote:
Tue Jun 09, 2020 12:14 am
SRW wrote:
Mon Jun 08, 2020 11:32 pm
Unusually strident words from UDIA. I wonder if someone there is connected to a private bid? Either way, their argument is undone by this statement:
“If we’re talking about a residential development to compete with other people who already do that, it doesn’t pass the test for why government should be using taxpayer money.

“I’m not sure what articulated goal the government’s had so far in their term, that points to this decision being consistent with a strategy.’’

Mr Gerace said, assuming a $30 million purchase price for the Anzac Hwy site alone, that amount of money could instead be used to deliver 1200 grants of $25,000 for people looking to get into the housing market.
So in their estimation, the role of government is not to act as a public interest developer but to subsidise private profiteering? That's almost as noxious an attitude as the Commonwealth's Homebuilder rort.

In any event:
Property Council SA executive director Daniel Gannon said if there was the opportunity to involve the private sector in any future development it would be welcome.

“Renewal SA has long partnered with private operators to deliver government services, and long may that continue in a productive way,’’ Mr Gannon said.
Exactly. Bowden is the template here. The government can determine the standards of design and affordability and partner with the private sector to deliver it.
I'm not overly concerned with private investors putting forward a bid, saves our government money and will surely fast-track the knock on effect in the surrounding areas like Dudley Park and Islington from all the Churchill Road developments.
Yeah, I'm not fussed if it gets up without government, that'd be obviously good. I just reject the implication that the government shouldn't be involved or only involved to the extent of subsidizing private profit.
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5937
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
Has thanked: 838 times
Been thanked: 1617 times

Re: 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#83 Post by Norman » Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:31 am

A great outcome for the Prospect site would be the purchase by the government, rebuild of the Islington station (and renaming it Churchill or Prospect North), master planning the site and releasing it to the private sector with reasonably strict guidelines on design, density and open space. Something like a mini Bowden.

Nort
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1316
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm
Has thanked: 299 times
Been thanked: 179 times

Re: 10 Anzac Highway | Kaufland Supermarket

#84 Post by Nort » Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:45 am

Yup, this is a unique plot of land. A good outcome would be for the government to buy it, plan out a Bowden style development and then sell parcels of land to developers with affordable housing included in the mix (much like Norman suggested for Prospect as well).

Private developers will scream and complain if it means they make a cent less profit, but there is a weird juxtaposition in Adelaide where inside the parklands everyone is proud of the way the city was carefully planned out but then seem to be against any larger scale planning outside the city centre.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests