News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
Goodsy
Legendary Member!
Posts: 871
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1726 Post by Goodsy » Mon Mar 11, 2019 11:03 am

SBD wrote:
Sun Mar 10, 2019 6:38 pm
PeFe wrote:
Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:42 pm
SBD wrote:
Sat Mar 09, 2019 2:20 pm
Maybe I am out of step with "modern thinking". I think we'd be better off if Elizabeth, Mount Barker, Stirling, Reynella, Noarlunga had stayed as regional centres rather than becoming predominantly dormitories for people working in Adelaide. There are a lot more populous cities in the world with much smaller footprints than Adelaide.
Well its too late now, Elizabeth, Mt Barker, Reynella have effectively been Adelaide suburbs for a long time ......the question is now what development do you plan for them? Leave them as dormitory suburbs where people drive out at 8 am and return at 6pm (or if you are really lucky, decent public transport to their place of work) or do you consider activating some sort of development (and I mean more than a shopping centre!)

And Murray Bridge really isn't that far away in commute times (1 hour to the Adelaide CBD). Plenty of people in Sydney and Melbourne do that already (and I am not arguing that Murray Bridge should become a suburb, I would rather see Adelaide consolidate its already established footprint and stop the sprawl..
No to Buckland Park!)
Contrary to the popular opinion that the last employer left the Elizabeth area when General Motors stopped manufacturing cars in Australia, there are still a lot of employers in the area - Defence, several Defence contractors, Drake's new warehouse opens mid-year, Coles warehouse, Inghams, Treasury Wines warehouse, health services around the Lyell McEwin Hospital. I have been to the CBD a couple of times this year so far I think.

I agree that they have become somewhat of Adelaide dormitories. I don't have a good solution for what went wrong to make that happen and whether it is possible to reverse it. I know that making commuting easier is not going to fix it. Making commuting from even further away easier is just going to continue the issue. Murray Bridge is further from the CBD than Buckland Park, and far more expensive to build commuter rail to. If either is to be expanded for Adelaide's urban sprawl, Buckland Park swampland is a better choice (assuming the houses are far enough above the streets to handle Gawler River floods).
Two Wells and Virginia will be where the growth happens (where it is already happening).. And they're both already on a rail corridor. Build a new passenger line following the ARTC line from Salisbury to Two Wells or even extend it to Mallala

There's also the cheapo option of bringing standard gauge into Adelaide station and running service on that

User avatar
PeFe
Legendary Member!
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:47 am
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1727 Post by PeFe » Mon Mar 11, 2019 12:20 pm

Goodsy wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2019 11:03 am
Two Wells and Virginia will be where the growth happens (where it is already happening).. And they're both already on a rail corridor. Build a new passenger line following the ARTC line from Salisbury to Two Wells or even extend it to Mallala
Seriously what is the point of expanding Adelaide's urban footprint out further to places like Two Wells or Mallala?
There are no services out there, no jobs, no public transport, no entertainment of any sort....

The population of the Adelaide metro area is is only 1.35 million.....nothing in world terms, and the urban footprint is one of the largest in the world for this population......no European city with the comparable population (Toulouse for example ) is the size of Adelaide. You have to travel to the North America to find comparable populations spread out over a comparable area.

Urban consolidation offers a chance for Adelaide to regain some of its "urban fabric" lost before the onslaught of the motor car (people living close to services and jobs with adequate public transport)

And given Adelaide's elderly population, there will plenty of available family homes as the elderly downsize or move to city apartments, just as the 35 year olds sell up their city apartments to move to suburbia to have kids.

Goodsy
Legendary Member!
Posts: 871
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1728 Post by Goodsy » Mon Mar 11, 2019 12:42 pm

PeFe wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2019 12:20 pm
Goodsy wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2019 11:03 am
Two Wells and Virginia will be where the growth happens (where it is already happening).. And they're both already on a rail corridor. Build a new passenger line following the ARTC line from Salisbury to Two Wells or even extend it to Mallala
There are no services out there, no public transport

He says.. in a thread specifically about Public Transport and Policy.


It doesn't mater how you feel about it.. Because it's happening now, homes are being built and people are moving in.

User avatar
1NEEDS2POST
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:01 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1729 Post by 1NEEDS2POST » Tue Mar 12, 2019 8:23 pm

ml69 wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2019 2:53 pm
claybro wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 7:01 pm
SBD wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 10:44 am
I may have misunderstood you. I was thinking of the loop through Belair/Blackwood/Eden Hills as the problem. Are you meaning the section from Bridgewater through Balhannah and Nairne?
Yes. Removing that giant deviation would speed up a passenger service significantly. As you say though, the freeway alignment may be too steep.
A rail service to Mt Barker would cost several billion dollars with huge lengths of tunnels required and would be a giant waste of money. There are higher priorities than this.

Buses down the freeway are just as fast.

All we need is another bus lane for the last 1-2km of freeway downtrack towards the Tollgate. Then we need a bus-only tunnel to connect the Tollgate with Fullarton Rd near Vic Park racecourse (thereby completely bypassing Glen Osmond Rd). Then it’s a simple left turn down Wakefield St into the CBD ... this could also be on a bus lane.
Another "out there" idea to improve the bus service is the Mount Barker O-Bahn thread: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=6340

O-Bahn guideways can run buses at 165 km/h, so a high speed bus to Mount Barker will be much faster than driving. Laying guideways is much cheaper than tunnels.

User avatar
PeFe
Legendary Member!
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:47 am
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1730 Post by PeFe » Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:42 pm

1NEEDS2POST wrote:
Tue Mar 12, 2019 8:23 pm

O-Bahn guideways can run buses at 165 km/h, so a high speed bus to Mount Barker will be much faster than driving. Laying guideways is much cheaper than tunnels.
Mt Barker buses already have a freeway to drive on.........why would you build an O-Bahn up there? You wouldn't.......

Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2024
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1731 Post by Aidan » Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:35 am

1NEEDS2POST wrote: O-Bahn guideways can run buses at 165 km/h, so a high speed bus to Mount Barker will be much faster than driving. Laying guideways is much cheaper than tunnels.
165km/h??? Where did you get that figure?
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.

Eurostar
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 394
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:44 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1732 Post by Eurostar » Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:39 am

I was told by a bus driver that the latest buses are played around with, it makes them more economical but bit gutless, hence they crawl up South Eastern Freeway and Southern Expressway

Goodsy
Legendary Member!
Posts: 871
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1733 Post by Goodsy » Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:07 am

Eurostar wrote:
Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:39 am
I was told by a bus driver that the latest buses are played around with, it makes them more economical but bit gutless, hence they crawl up South Eastern Freeway and Southern Expressway
they're geared to accelerate fast in stop start traffic, not cruise at a high speed. That's why they scream on the o-bahn and occasionally catch fire

User avatar
1NEEDS2POST
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:01 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1734 Post by 1NEEDS2POST » Wed Mar 13, 2019 12:32 pm

Aidan wrote:
Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:35 am
1NEEDS2POST wrote: O-Bahn guideways can run buses at 165 km/h, so a high speed bus to Mount Barker will be much faster than driving. Laying guideways is much cheaper than tunnels.
165km/h??? Where did you get that figure?
The technology can handle that speed, not the existing one in Adelaide. http://actbus.net/forum/index.php?topic=2310.0

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5519
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
Has thanked: 725 times
Been thanked: 1198 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1735 Post by Norman » Wed Mar 13, 2019 1:56 pm

1NEEDS2POST wrote:
Aidan wrote:
Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:35 am
1NEEDS2POST wrote: O-Bahn guideways can run buses at 165 km/h, so a high speed bus to Mount Barker will be much faster than driving. Laying guideways is much cheaper than tunnels.
165km/h??? Where did you get that figure?
The technology can handle that speed, not the existing one in Adelaide. http://actbus.net/forum/index.php?topic=2310.0
I've never seen the 165km/h referenced anywhere but in this website, and a forum full of bus gunzels is not a valid source of information.

Westside
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 4:30 pm
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 31 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1736 Post by Westside » Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:27 pm

O-bahn will only control the bus's lateral movement. It does nothing to slow the bus down again at the end of the steep decline. Which is why buses and all other heavy vehicles are and will still have a restricted speed when making that journey. An o-bahn will not fix that. 165 km/hr will require much greater headways and potentially rail-like signalling to be able to address that, which will reduce the effectiveness of that traffic corridor. The only thing that will help that corridor is an extra bus-only lane between the city and Crafers - but that is the expensive part.

OlympusAnt
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 7:31 pm
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: News & Discussion: Public Transport Service & Policy

#1737 Post by OlympusAnt » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:20 pm

Fix Glen Osmond Rd, especially the intersection with South Tce/Pultney St. Surely a sacrifice of a little bit of the parklands for improved traffic flow could be done.
Follow me on Flickr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/135625678@N06/

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 7 guests