Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
-
Goodsy
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am
#3136
Post
by Goodsy » Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:25 pm
claybro wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:48 pm
Goodsy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:49 pm
1NEEDS2POST wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:41 pm
I don't see why it needs to be a bored tunnel. Essentially what they're doing is putting a road beneath a road, so why not a cut and cover tunnel?
Because we'd want any freeway grade road along there to be wider than Portrush Road currently is. Doing that you'd need to acquire property on one side or the other, and cut off everyone's driveway access while they dig out the road
What does Portrush road have to do with the North/South motorway?
Portrush road was being discussed in the previous comments, so I assumed we were talking about it.
That being said. my response can apply to any future tunnel on any corridor, east/west or north/south
-
SBD
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2526
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
- Location: Blakeview
#3137
Post
by SBD » Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:18 pm
kenget wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:01 pm
rev wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:20 pm
Will the tunnel have any entry/exit points along it's route, or just at either end?
Personally I think Anzac Hwy, Sir Donald Bradman Dr and the City Ring route is a must for having entries/exits. The maybes for me would be Cross Rd, Daws Rd and then the exit near or at Henley Beach Rd.
I'd expect that Cross Road access is essential to access the motorway in both directions unless an alternative link from Portrush Road and the South Eastern Freeway is already well into construction by the time the North-South motorway opened. It is the main link from the southeast to the airport and the eastern suburbs to the southern suburbs. Those uses don't change even if Portrush Road becomes the freeway from the southeast to Port Adelaide.
-
SBD
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2526
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
- Location: Blakeview
#3138
Post
by SBD » Mon Oct 15, 2018 10:23 pm
rev wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:20 pm
Goodsy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:49 pm
1NEEDS2POST wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:41 pm
I don't see why it needs to be a bored tunnel. Essentially what they're doing is putting a road beneath a road, so why not a cut and cover tunnel?
Because we'd want any freeway grade road along there to be wider than Portrush Road currently is. Doing that you'd need to acquire property on one side or the other, and cut off everyone's driveway access while they dig out the road
There'd also be less disruptions to traffic on South Road.
Even with a tunnel, especially one that is 10.5km long, they're going to need to acquire some property still.
Will the tunnel have any entry/exit points along it's route, or just at either end?
Also, with modern tunnels and the safety measures built in, there'd need to be some above ground facilities and services built.
A billion dollars to acquire properties, or a tunnel. Personally I think if it comes down to cost, they wont do a tunnel but will continue the trench and acquire properties.
Politically, and what might cost the government votes and a second term in power? then they'll go tunnel, especially if the federal government is going to contribute a substantial amount.
Personally I'm hoping for a tunnel, that has some exit/entry points along the route, but I think a tunnel is highly unlikely.
I imagine that the cost of a bored tunnel depends a lot on things that are not readily visible to us - the depth of the water table and whether it is all silt or if there is rock. If those things are amenable, a tunnel can be deep enough to save the cost of a lot of the "service relocation" that has been needed for the trench sections and road widening.
I wonder what the laws and restrictions are on tunnelling under private land. How deep would it have to be to come under mining laws instead of property laws? The state already owns the mining rights.
-
dbl96
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:31 pm
#3139
Post
by dbl96 » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:33 am
kenget wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:01 pm
rev wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:20 pm
Will the tunnel have any entry/exit points along it's route, or just at either end?
Personally I think Anzac Hwy, Sir Donald Bradman Dr and the City Ring route is a must for having entries/exits. The maybes for me would be Cross Rd, Daws Rd and then the exit near or at Henley Beach Rd.
As has been discussed previously on this forum, the Cross Rd intersection will be the important of them all, because that intersection will be where freight from the South-Eastern Freeway joins the North-South Corridor.
-
alexczarn
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:13 am
#3140
Post
by alexczarn » Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:38 am
Still 60km/h on the N-S Mwy this morning.
-
HiTouch
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm
#3141
Post
by HiTouch » Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:50 pm
Went for a drive on the T2T part of the Motorway. I gotta say, its probably the most unremarkable development of the road. They should have made it longer, connected it with the Super way. When the Superway was done, it felt like you were going places.
What really grinds my gears and rattles my Knick knacks is that this road is 60kph and the bottleneck at the Southern end feels like it makes up for all the time supposedly gained. 20 minute bottleneck, kid you not.
-
claybro
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm
#3142
Post
by claybro » Tue Oct 16, 2018 1:27 pm
HiTouch wrote: ↑Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:50 pm
Went for a drive on the T2T part of the Motorway. I gotta say, its probably the most unremarkable development of the road. They should have made it longer, connected it with the Super way. When the Superway was done, it felt like you were going places.
What really grinds my gears and rattles my Knick knacks is that this road is 60kph and the bottleneck at the Southern end feels like it makes up for all the time supposedly gained. 20 minute bottleneck, kid you not.
You do realise the speed limit will increase shortly once everyone is used to it? You do also realise the next section to commence shortly will connect it with the superway. I assume you also know that it is planed within a decade to be completely non stop from the Southern Expressway to the Northern Expressway?
-
Kasey771
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:56 am
#3143
Post
by Kasey771 » Tue Oct 16, 2018 1:32 pm
claybro wrote:HiTouch wrote: ↑Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:50 pm
Went for a drive on the T2T part of the Motorway. I gotta say, its probably the most unremarkable development of the road. They should have made it longer, connected it with the Super way. When the Superway was done, it felt like you were going places.
What really grinds my gears and rattles my Knick knacks is that this road is 60kph and the bottleneck at the Southern end feels like it makes up for all the time supposedly gained. 20 minute bottleneck, kid you not.
You do realise the speed limit will increase shortly once everyone is used to it? You do also realise the next section to commence shortly will connect it with the superway. I assume you also know that it is planed within a decade to be completely non stop from the Southern Expressway to the Northern Expressway?
I don’t like the drivers need to get used to it excuse for 60 kph. Lots of roads are new to drivers when they travel. If you’re a competent driver you quickly adapt. If the road is finished to the 80 kph standard then stop f**k arsing about and make it so!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.
-
claybro
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm
#3144
Post
by claybro » Tue Oct 16, 2018 1:41 pm
Kasey771 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 16, 2018 1:32 pm
claybro wrote:HiTouch wrote: ↑Tue Oct 16, 2018 12:50 pm
Went for a drive on the T2T part of the Motorway. I gotta say, its probably the most unremarkable development of the road. They should have made it longer, connected it with the Super way. When the Superway was done, it felt like you were going places.
What really grinds my gears and rattles my Knick knacks is that this road is 60kph and the bottleneck at the Southern end feels like it makes up for all the time supposedly gained. 20 minute bottleneck, kid you not.
You do realise the speed limit will increase shortly once everyone is used to it? You do also realise the next section to commence shortly will connect it with the superway. I assume you also know that it is planed within a decade to be completely non stop from the Southern Expressway to the Northern Expressway?
I don’t like the drivers need to get used to it excuse for 60 kph. Lots of roads are new to drivers when they travel. If you’re a competent driver you quickly adapt. If the road is finished to the 80 kph standard then stop f**k arsing about and make it so!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
From memory the Superway was set a 60km/h for a few weeks after opening...but yes, do agree is seems a bit precious.
-
rhino
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
- Location: Nairne
#3145
Post
by rhino » Tue Oct 16, 2018 2:06 pm
I understood that the 60km/h limit was temporary until the bitumen settled. That could be wrong, but that's what I heard when it opened. And, as has been said before, the Superway had the same issue.
cheers,
Rhino
-
Kasey771
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:56 am
#3146
Post
by Kasey771 » Tue Oct 16, 2018 2:11 pm
rhino wrote:I understood that the 60km/h limit was temporary until the bitumen settled. That could be wrong, but that's what I heard when it opened. And, as has been said before, the Superway had the same issue.
See, that is a more believable excuse than drivers need to get used to it. I’m not across how bitumen reacts to say a fully loaded 18-wheeler when it is freshly laid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.
-
SBD
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2526
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
- Location: Blakeview
#3147
Post
by SBD » Tue Oct 16, 2018 4:50 pm
Kasey771 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 16, 2018 2:11 pm
rhino wrote:I understood that the 60km/h limit was temporary until the bitumen settled. That could be wrong, but that's what I heard when it opened. And, as has been said before, the Superway had the same issue.
See, that is a more believable excuse than drivers need to get used to it. I’m not across how bitumen reacts to say a fully loaded 18-wheeler when it is freshly laid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Most roads that get new full-depth bitumen are limited to 40 or 60 to start with. I assumed it had to do with oils leaching out making it slippery. You don't notice so much if it is re-laying an existing road.
-
rev
- SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
- Posts: 6038
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm
#3148
Post
by rev » Tue Oct 16, 2018 6:48 pm
Kasey771 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 16, 2018 2:11 pm
rhino wrote:I understood that the 60km/h limit was temporary until the bitumen settled. That could be wrong, but that's what I heard when it opened. And, as has been said before, the Superway had the same issue.
See, that is a more believable excuse than drivers need to get used to it. I’m not across how bitumen reacts to say a fully loaded 18-wheeler when it is freshly laid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s not an excuse.
Relax. What different does it make if it’s not set to 80 from day one? You’re travelling non stop, so you’re saving time regardless.
-
rhino
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
- Location: Nairne
#3149
Post
by rhino » Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:19 am
rev wrote: ↑Tue Oct 16, 2018 6:48 pm
You’re travelling non stop, so you’re saving time regardless.
/\/\ This /\/\
cheers,
Rhino
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 46 guests