[U/C] M2 North-South Motorway

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
fishinajar
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 12:23 pm
Location: Adelaide

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2041 Post by fishinajar » Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:03 am

claybro wrote:
ChillyPhilly wrote:
mawsonguy wrote:The big drawback with tunnels and trenches is that, in the future when demand has increased and the road has reached capacity, they cannot be easily widened to accomodate extra lanes. So it is deirable that you make them extra wide to future proof them. For that reason, 6 lanes for the inner city section is a must.
This is the dilemma with the Gallipoli Underpass.
I thought I read somewhere it was possible to squeeze anther 2 lanes out of the Gallipoli underpass? If not then definitely a big fail in its original design. Still there is plenty of room to widen the trench at this point.
We don't necessarily need or want greater capacity in the serviceable future. The 30yp is promoting more infill development, more pt usage, and we have autonomous vehicles on the horizon. Getting better flows through the central section of the corridor will also increase the flow further out.

alexczarn
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:13 am

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2042 Post by alexczarn » Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:27 am

ChillyPhilly wrote:
mawsonguy wrote:The big drawback with tunnels and trenches is that, in the future when demand has increased and the road has reached capacity, they cannot be easily widened to accomodate extra lanes. So it is deirable that you make them extra wide to future proof them. For that reason, 6 lanes for the inner city section is a must.
This is the dilemma with the Gallipoli Underpass.
Also on the Nth-Sth Mwy the northbound section drops to 2 lanes just before the 2 lanes join from Grand Jctn Rd. That will end up being a big bottleneck with the Northern Connector.

Mr Messy
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:55 pm

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2043 Post by Mr Messy » Tue Mar 14, 2017 9:34 am

alexczarn wrote:
ChillyPhilly wrote:
mawsonguy wrote:The big drawback with tunnels and trenches is that, in the future when demand has increased and the road has reached capacity, they cannot be easily widened to accomodate extra lanes. So it is deirable that you make them extra wide to future proof them. For that reason, 6 lanes for the inner city section is a must.
This is the dilemma with the Gallipoli Underpass.
Also on the Nth-Sth Mwy the northbound section drops to 2 lanes just before the 2 lanes join from Grand Jctn Rd. That will end up being a big bottleneck with the Northern Connector.
That part was designed so they could change it to 3 lanes at a later date

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2044 Post by ChillyPhilly » Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:12 am

claybro wrote:
ChillyPhilly wrote:
mawsonguy wrote:The big drawback with tunnels and trenches is that, in the future when demand has increased and the road has reached capacity, they cannot be easily widened to accomodate extra lanes. So it is deirable that you make them extra wide to future proof them. For that reason, 6 lanes for the inner city section is a must.
This is the dilemma with the Gallipoli Underpass.
I thought I read somewhere it was possible to squeeze anther 2 lanes out of the Gallipoli underpass? If not then definitely a big fail in its original design. Still there is plenty of room to widen the trench at this point.
Maybe by widening the cut to the west. There is some vacant land to the immediate northwest of the intersection as well.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3211
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2045 Post by [Shuz] » Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:51 am

They definitely stuffed up Gallipoli Underpass design. 3 lanes at 80kph cannot fit without any shoulders for emergencies and an extremely narrow median.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3067
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2046 Post by rhino » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:14 pm

[Shuz] wrote:They definitely stuffed up Gallipoli Underpass design. 3 lanes at 80kph cannot fit without any shoulders for emergencies and an extremely narrow median.
In Shuz's opinion
cheers,
Rhino

alexczarn
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:13 am

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2047 Post by alexczarn » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:17 pm

[Shuz] wrote:They definitely stuffed up Gallipoli Underpass design. 3 lanes at 80kph cannot fit without any shoulders for emergencies and an extremely narrow median.
ITS would partially solve the no shoulder problem.

Brucetiki
Legendary Member!
Posts: 985
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:20 pm

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2048 Post by Brucetiki » Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:46 pm

alexczarn wrote:
[Shuz] wrote:They definitely stuffed up Gallipoli Underpass design. 3 lanes at 80kph cannot fit without any shoulders for emergencies and an extremely narrow median.
ITS would partially solve the no shoulder problem.
Assuming Adelaide motorists obey the ITS.

Bacon
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 1:17 pm

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2049 Post by Bacon » Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:41 pm

[Shuz] wrote:They definitely stuffed up Gallipoli Underpass design. 3 lanes at 80kph cannot fit without any shoulders for emergencies and an extremely narrow median.
Heysen Tunnels don't have a much shoulder, I drove the M5 tunnel (80kph) and it has zero shoulder. But what it does have is more intensive monitoring.

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2050 Post by drsmith » Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:00 pm

The Gallipoli Underpass looks like it has a width of 21m between the side barriers. That's enough for 6x3.5m lanes but without any shoulders or space for a central barrier. Narrowing the lanes to 3.4m would provide 600mm of space for a central barrier but the complete lack of shoulders may mean the underpass would have to operate at a lower speed limit than the future expressway either side. That's probably not a good idea either.

The underpass may operate OK for some time in a 4-lane configuration for some time after the route either side is built to 6-lane expressway standard due to lower traffic volumes on the road section under the bridge.

User avatar
SouthAussie94
Legendary Member!
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:03 pm
Location: Southern Suburbs

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2051 Post by SouthAussie94 » Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:00 pm

If the motorway to the north of ANZAC Hwy is going to be trenched, then it's likely the Northern ramp of the underpass will need to be reworked. Assuming the motorway is also trenched to the South, this ramp would also need to be reworked.

These reworked sections could be made wider, leaving only a relatively short 400-500m section that is narrow with no shoulders.

Does anyone have an estimate of how wide the cladding on the walls of the underpass is? Removing this could add another few hundred mm's.
"All we are is bags of bones pushing against a self imposed tide. Just be content with staying alive"

Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2052 Post by ChillyPhilly » Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:38 pm

SouthAussie94 wrote:If the motorway to the north of ANZAC Hwy is going to be trenched, then it's likely the Northern ramp of the underpass will need to be reworked. Assuming the motorway is also trenched to the South, this ramp would also need to be reworked.

These reworked sections could be made wider, leaving only a relatively short 400-500m section that is narrow with no shoulders.

Does anyone have an estimate of how wide the cladding on the walls of the underpass is? Removing this could add another few hundred mm's.
Surely it will be reworked. When driving in either direction along there, the gradient never really feels suitable for 80 km/h, let alone the proposed design speed of 90 k's.

Here's the spare land:
Image
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2526
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2053 Post by SBD » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:10 pm

How wide is the final width of the T2T trench for comparison? The current bike lane could be sacrificed to the third motor vehicle lane, as the plan appears to only permit bikes on the surface lanes of the non-stop motorway, and not included in all artist impressions. I would still feel uncomfortable driving against the wall with a semi-trailer or B-double in the 2nd lane next to me, but it is possible I will dislike that in any of the trenched sections.

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2073
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2054 Post by Llessur2002 » Fri Mar 17, 2017 7:25 am

They're laying asphalt along both sides of Port Road leading up to the new bridge in preparation for putting the road back from whence it came.

It's nice to see that the footpaths around this intersection have been widened considerably as part of the works.

rockthenation
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:57 am

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#2055 Post by rockthenation » Fri Mar 17, 2017 1:40 pm

Does anyone know if that derelict looking building next to Croydon Motors near the corner of South Rd & Hawker St is being demolished?
The front verandah was removed from it a few months back but nothing since then.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 36 guests