[COM] Oaklands Crossing | $174m

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#271 Post by Norman » Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:08 pm

muzzamo wrote:The have updated the timetables to include the new stopping pattern at oaklands.

The timetable update is a super hack job though, its in a "hybrid" old and new style.. Typical crap job done by transadelaide:

http://www.adelaidemetro.com.au/routes/ ... ttable.pdf
That is SHOCKING :wank:

Check out the Routemap...
http://www.adelaidemetro.com.au/routes/ ... utemap.pdf

There is no Mega Go Zone to the Airport anymore...

User avatar
Will409
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 am
Location: Parafield Gardens

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#272 Post by Will409 » Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:20 pm

C'mon TransAdelaide, surely your resources aren't that stretched that you can't make a new timetable to the new format! That is pathetic. As an additional minor gripe, the route map doesn't show the station as having moved any closer to the level crossing and instead is still in it's previous position.
Image LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE.

User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2209
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#273 Post by Cruise » Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:28 pm

Why didn't they go to the same style as the gawler line timetable?

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#274 Post by Norman » Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:09 pm

These photos are a bit outdated (30 June) but show the station in operation.

But first, an update:
Bike Lockers now in operation. Do note that these are the ones from the old station.
Image

Image

Temporary Pedestrian Crossing
Image

Image

New Track
Image

And for the operational photos now
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Enjoy :)

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#275 Post by Shuz » Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:46 pm

Cheers Norm.

Having been through the station twice recently, I am overwhelmingly impressed with the lighting of the structure by night-time. It really improves visibility and safety in the area. I definetly believe that this is the standard that all hi-frequency stations should be up to - and I will be curious to see how the Parafield makeover turns out, whether thats an appropriate standard for the rest of the networks stations.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#276 Post by Norman » Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:33 pm

Will posted an update on Parafield in the relavent thread :wink:

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#277 Post by jk1237 » Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:51 pm

great pics Norman.

Quick question, I can post 2 of your pics on skyscrapercity?

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#278 Post by Norman » Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:41 pm

Go for it. All my photos can be used for whatever.

muzzamo
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1026
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 4:44 pm

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#279 Post by muzzamo » Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:54 am

Norman wrote:Go for it. All my photos can be used for whatever.
You should remove the watermark then add licence details to your site so that they can be nabbed and used on wikipedia :-)

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#280 Post by Norman » Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:24 pm

muzzamo wrote:
Norman wrote:Go for it. All my photos can be used for whatever.
You should remove the watermark then add licence details to your site so that they can be nabbed and used on wikipedia :-)
I still do want the credit for the photos. But watermarked they can be used anywhere. I've had issues of people stealing my work without permission, including News.com.au, where they stole a few videos off my YouTube channel.

Pat28
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 4:42 pm

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#281 Post by Pat28 » Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:55 pm

Norman wrote:'ve had issues of people stealing my work without permission, including News.com.au, where they stole a few videos off my YouTube channel.
Ouch, well what can you say, it is the 'Tiser they need something reliable once in a while. Keep up the work Norman. :D
Besser Verkehr in den Bergen

muzzamo
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1026
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 4:44 pm

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#282 Post by muzzamo » Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:58 pm

Norman wrote:I still do want the credit for the photos. But watermarked they can be used anywhere. I've had issues of people stealing my work without permission, including News.com.au, where they stole a few videos off my YouTube channel.
Fair enough.. For wikipedia they would have to have the watermark removed and an appropriate free licence.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#283 Post by Norman » Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:02 pm

muzzamo wrote:
Norman wrote:I still do want the credit for the photos. But watermarked they can be used anywhere. I've had issues of people stealing my work without permission, including News.com.au, where they stole a few videos off my YouTube channel.
Fair enough.. For wikipedia they would have to have the watermark removed and an appropriate free licence.
Just message me if you need a photo, I'll be happy to oblige.

jlimty
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:08 pm

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#284 Post by jlimty » Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:48 pm

Shuz wrote:Cheers Norm.

Having been through the station twice recently, I am overwhelmingly impressed with the lighting of the structure by night-time. It really improves visibility and safety in the area. I definetly believe that this is the standard that all hi-frequency stations should be up to - and I will be curious to see how the Parafield makeover turns out, whether thats an appropriate standard for the rest of the networks stations.
Totally agree mate. I was just driving past last night after a movie at Marion and the illumination of the station really stood out. My girlfriend even commented "All the train stations should look like that" :mrgreen:

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

[COM] Re: Oaklands Park Interchange

#285 Post by skyliner » Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:35 pm

The lighting is particularly impressive in those pics - puts Adelaide central to shame.

Question - do ANY suburban trains go over 3 units in length? Is the length governed by frequency cutting out the need or is it controlled by platform length.

Even when I was in Adelaide they occasionally ran 5 coaches together.Would you believe they ONCE they ran 7 coach trains to Largs - have piccies to prove it. As yet i have yet to learn how to put them on this site with the current computer - almost totally full.

ADELAIDE - CITY ON THE MOVE
Jack.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests