News & Discussion: Regional Transport

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2209
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

Re: Railcar Passenger service, Angaston to Adelaide.

#31 Post by Cruise » Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:39 pm

oops, once again i have forgetten everyone works in the city, silly me

User avatar
Wilfy 2007
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:54 pm

Re: Railcar Passenger service, Angaston to Adelaide.

#32 Post by Wilfy 2007 » Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:03 am

Somebody wrote:Why should it be designed for CBD workers? Encouraging people to commute long distances is not a good thing, local employment should be provided.

One train a day would be useless. Should run numerous trips over the day, have one trip arriving Adelaide before 8am, but have them running IN BOTH DIRECTIONS during the day, off-peak included, and so you can market it to people from Adelaide who would like to do day trips to the Barossa Valley.
Somebody,
You are right, one train a day would be useless.
The services would need to cater for passengers in both directions.
An extension of the Survey that is currently being conducted would be to hold a public forum in th Barossa to try and assess the numbers going out of the Barossa on a daily basis and the number going in to the Barossa.
Hence in my letter to the Government and Opposition MP's, which I will be writing this afternoon I will be proposing a trail period for a service to run, with the intention to gain more information about the passengers and where they are going, and where are they coming from.

The timetable would have to be worked in with the timetable that was introduced on the 27th of April so that basically what happens that some of the current services are extended into the Barossa.

Maybe the idea would be to plan for the actual service to start in 2018 when the Jumbo's are going to be taken out of service or better still once the New Electric Railcars have been delivered the Jumbo's could be moved to the Barossa and to the Seaford/Aldinga extension.

Regards,

User avatar
Will409
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 am
Location: Parafield Gardens

Re: Railcar Passenger service, Angaston to Adelaide.

#33 Post by Will409 » Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:32 pm

Brian, there are a couple of issues that need to be addressed with the Jumbos.

- The Noarlunga Centre to Seaford/Aldinga extension will more then likely be electrified from the outset. A total of $56million has been allocated to purchase 14 new railcars (probably more like EMUs in light of the State Budget). In addition, the railcar fleet will be increased from the present 99 to 120 railcars to provide services if the system stays in it's current form. If the extension is built, the railcar fleet will go upto 134 units.

- The cast steel bogies of the Jumbos will not allow for easy gauge conversion and can only possibly be done with some VERY EXPENSIVE modifications to the bogies. Considering the age of the Jumbos, the cost of gauge conversion may not be considered justifiable.

- As pointed out above, the Jumbos will be around 38/39 years old by 2018 and very much at the end of their useful life span. The cost of gauge conversion as well as interior upgrades to suit longer distance running will more then likely rule out using the Jumbos in the Barossa.

Using old rollingstock doesn't exactly present a good image for potential passengers who you are trying to lure away from private transport. The best option would be to use new build stock based (mechanically atleast) on a prexisting design such as the V/locities. You can cut design costs and speed up delivery using a suitable prexisting design. The only real future for the Jumbos after withdrawl would be either in preservation (most likely with the NRM, Steamranger and possibly the YRP) and, sadly a few, at Sims.
Image LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE.

Pat28
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 4:42 pm

Re: Railcar Passenger service, Angaston to Adelaide.

#34 Post by Pat28 » Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:33 pm

Oooh, V/Locities, on the line to Angaston or even the Tilt Train or wait even better (if only mney were no object - wait...) an ICE

damn, gotta stop dreaming

Anyway, beside stopping at Angaston, Tanunda and Nuriootpa (maybe Lyndoch) where else could one have a station?
Besser Verkehr in den Bergen

Somebody
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 6:06 pm
Location: Australia (East Coast)

Re: Railcar Passenger service, Angaston to Adelaide.

#35 Post by Somebody » Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:40 pm

Why on earth Seaford/Aldinga would not be electrified would be beyond me - what would be the point of running a Noarlunga-Seaford/Aldinga diesel shuttle like Kiama-Nowra in NSW, when you have just electrified to Noarlunga and should keep the wires flowing.

Will it take until 2018 for every line to be converted to SG? If not then the Jumbos will either be going sooner than that OR will get converted to SG. Wouldn't surprise me if Belair was the last line to get it's upgrading given that it's not being electrified, would be an interesting line to see Jumbos live out their last days on. I have had the pleasure of riding 2008-2117 there in May 2007 :D
Pat28 wrote:or wait even better (if only mney were no object - wait...) an ICE
Why is money no object - they're 20+yrs old, narrow gauge and QR has little use for them. Wouldn't cost as much as new trains would, but would also be little use for SA!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InterCity_ ... tytrain%29
Image
The Gold Coast - Australia's centre for insipid, tacky & boring.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6391
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Railcar Passenger service, Angaston to Adelaide.

#36 Post by Norman » Sun Jul 20, 2008 9:48 pm

Somebody wrote:Why on earth Seaford/Aldinga would not be electrified would be beyond me - what would be the point of running a Noarlunga-Seaford/Aldinga diesel shuttle like Kiama-Nowra in NSW, when you have just electrified to Noarlunga and should keep the wires flowing.
Where did you read it wouldn't be electrified?
Somebody wrote:Will it take until 2018 for every line to be converted to SG? If not then the Jumbos will either be going sooner than that OR will get converted to SG. Wouldn't surprise me if Belair was the last line to get it's upgrading given that it's not being electrified, would be an interesting line to see Jumbos live out their last days on. I have had the pleasure of riding 2008-2117 there in May 2007 :D
Jumbos will probably continue to service until there is no more broad gauge left. They will not be converted to SG. The Adelaide Yard will be split or dual gauge while the 3000-class is refurbished, as they are going SG as well.
Somebody wrote:
Pat28 wrote:or wait even better (if only mney were no object - wait...) an ICE
Why is money no object - they're 20+yrs old, narrow gauge and QR has little use for them. Wouldn't cost as much as new trains would, but would also be little use for SA!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InterCity_ ... tytrain%29
Image
I think he means the German ICE... not an IC from QLD.

Pat28
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 4:42 pm

Re: Railcar Passenger service, Angaston to Adelaide.

#37 Post by Pat28 » Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:23 pm

German ICE all the way!
Besser Verkehr in den Bergen

User avatar
bm7500
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:04 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Railcar Passenger service, Angaston to Adelaide.

#38 Post by bm7500 » Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:54 pm

More specifically... ICE 3 ..... Sex on rails! :wink:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... nkfurt.jpg
ADELAIDE SINGAPORE LONDON BERLIN AMSTERDAM PARIS TOKYO AUCKLAND DOHA DUBLIN HONG KONG BANGKOK REYKJAVIK ROME MADRID BUDAPEST COPENHAGEN ZURICH BRUSSELS VIENNA PRAGUE STOCKHOLM LUXEMBOURG BRATISLAVA NASSAU DUBAI BAHRAIN KUALA LUMPUR HELSINKI GENEVA

Somebody
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 6:06 pm
Location: Australia (East Coast)

Re: Railcar Passenger service, Angaston to Adelaide.

#39 Post by Somebody » Mon Jul 21, 2008 2:46 pm

Harvey Norman wrote:Where did you read it wouldn't be electrified?
Use your eyes ;)
Wilfy 2007, three posts up wrote:Maybe the idea would be to plan for the actual service to start in 2018 when the Jumbo's are going to be taken out of service or better still once the New Electric Railcars have been delivered the Jumbo's could be moved to the Barossa and to the Seaford/Aldinga extension.
Norman wrote:I think he means the German ICE... not an IC from QLD.
I knew that ;) :twisted:
The Gold Coast - Australia's centre for insipid, tacky & boring.

William
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Survey for Barossa Rail Passeger service.

#40 Post by William » Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:36 pm

The Barossa Valley Rail Survey has had some interesting results, Some of the surveys that have returned have had letters attached from people from Truo, Blanche town and Kapunda, from people who commute on a regular bases to the Gawler railway station to get to work, there has also been a number of replies from the disabled and return replies from those who would need the service on the Barossa line for medical and age constraint reasons of why they would like to see a returned service to the Valley.

It was also brought to our attention that in 1968 when the line was closed, there was apparently a very large protest at the Angaston station against the govt closing this railway. Many people have also written to us explaining just how expensive it is to catch the bus service from the Barossa to the city and even just to Gawler, The information center in Gawler and in Tanunda have also said they get phone calls on a daily biases of people from interstate and overseas wanting to know if a passenger service runs to the Valley.

In this day and age, it has become quite apparent in the return surveys,that with the high cost of petrol, and running and owning a private vehicle is becoming increasingly expensive and there are many people not only in the Barossa region but in the Barossa surrounding areas that people are very concerned about the lack of public transport or a passenger rail service to these areas, many many people have been continually asking that now more than ever a rail service with a park and ride facility be established along the Barossa line to Angaston and in many areas of the states Mid North.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2675
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Survey for Barossa Rail Passeger service.

#41 Post by Ho Really » Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:06 pm

William wrote:...The information center in Gawler and in Tanunda have also said they get phone calls on a daily biases of people from interstate and overseas wanting to know if a passenger service runs to the Valley...
This is another reason why they should not rip up the Rosewater loop. This up-and-coming summer Adelaide will have a record number of cruise ship visits at Outer Harbor and many of the visitors will be going to The Barossa. A tourist train (a new or refurbished 'Wine Train') using the Rosewater loop to the Barossa Valley would be great for tourism. Looking to the future, Adelaide has also the potential to become a cruise ship homeport. In a recent report into the Australian cruise industry it has been said that port infrastructure at some eastcoast ports has been lacking and that some cruise companies are thinking about moving elsewhere. At Outer Harbor we can handle the bigger ships with no problems (something that Brisbane couldn't recently), we also have plenty of room for expansion of facilities if required. We already have a world-class international airport and good hotels, all we need now is to spruce up our rail system, which conveniently enough will be getting a major overhaul over the next few years. Let's think lateral!

Cheers

P.S. Of course trains can also run from the city (and light rail from elsewhere).
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6391
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Survey for Barossa Rail Passeger service.

#42 Post by Norman » Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:17 pm

The Rosewater Loop has already been replaced by the Port River Rail Bridge.

Somebody
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 6:06 pm
Location: Australia (East Coast)

Re: Survey for Barossa Rail Passeger service.

#43 Post by Somebody » Fri Jul 25, 2008 12:07 am

Ho Really wrote:This is another reason why they should not rip up the Rosewater loop. This up-and-coming summer Adelaide will have a record number of cruise ship visits at Outer Harbor and many of the visitors will be going to The Barossa
Do you really think that they will want to step off the cruise ship, and straight into a train to visit the Barossa Valley, before they do so much as go into the heart of Adelaide City?

Bugger all people use Outer Harbor Station as is.
The Gold Coast - Australia's centre for insipid, tacky & boring.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2675
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Survey for Barossa Rail Passeger service.

#44 Post by Ho Really » Fri Jul 25, 2008 12:21 am

Norman wrote:The Rosewater Loop has already been replaced by the Port River Rail Bridge.
For freight yes, but will it ever be used for passenger services. That's the question.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2675
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Survey for Barossa Rail Passeger service.

#45 Post by Ho Really » Fri Jul 25, 2008 12:26 am

Somebody wrote:
Ho Really wrote:This is another reason why they should not rip up the Rosewater loop. This up-and-coming summer Adelaide will have a record number of cruise ship visits at Outer Harbor and many of the visitors will be going to The Barossa
Do you really think that they will want to step off the cruise ship, and straight into a train to visit the Barossa Valley, before they do so much as go into the heart of Adelaide City?

Bugger all people use Outer Harbor Station as is.
Some (tourists) would rather go to the city, others to Glenelg and others still to the hills (Cleland, Hahndorf, etc.), but you need to give them the option of going direct to the Barossa Valley.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 20 guests