If this goes ahead, will North Adelaide become metro Adelaide's 4th "skyline" (after the CBD, Glenelg and the southern CBD if it counts)? I'm probably getting a bit carried away
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Kent Town certainly doesn't have a skyline, just North Terrace House and those Malthouse apartments...although there are the East Park and Royal Hotel proposals, so we may see a little skyline form there. But what does Port Adelaide have besides that asbestos-filled, 70s-looking building and Newport Quays? As for Mawson Lakes, I'm completely unfamiliar with that area, so maybe that does have a little "skyline".[Shuz] wrote:Port Adelaide, Kent Town, Mawson Lakes are the other 'skylines' - if you can call them that.
One way would be to ask a cartographer.Ben wrote:Anyone have a way of working the heights above sea Level. that would be a good indication as to how visible it will be.
That block is apx 46m AHD + 54m height = 100m AHD.Ben wrote:I just had a thought, this building could potentially be taller than Westpac house given that it is set up high on the hill? Anyone have a way of working the heights above sea Level. that would be a good indication as to how visible it will be.
Probably an optical illusion, as both sites then slope down to the Torrens River. However, I think the rise from the river on the Nth Adelaide side is steeper, the rise on the Adelaide CBD side is more gradual... hence giving the impression that Brougham Pl is higher on the hill.Ben wrote:They are quite similar then, it seems much higher. Oh well thanks for that
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 52 guests