News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1761
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
I have no specific opinion myself, but once the Gawler electrification is done, wouldn't it be better to electrify the Hills line?
Would not electric traction produce a bigger improvement on the grades there? The Port line is flat, and the diesels would find that less of a challenge.
or is there some other consideration?
Also, there's a lot of development up North. If we don't plan some heavy rail there now, we never will.
Would not electric traction produce a bigger improvement on the grades there? The Port line is flat, and the diesels would find that less of a challenge.
or is there some other consideration?
Also, there's a lot of development up North. If we don't plan some heavy rail there now, we never will.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
The Sleeps Hill tunnel makes its very difficult to electrify the line. My understanding is it would require major works to install the lines due to its constructionrubberman wrote:I have no specific opinion myself, but once the Gawler electrification is done, wouldn't it be better to electrify the Hills line?
Would not electric traction produce a bigger improvement on the grades there? The Port line is flat, and the diesels would find that less of a challenge.
or is there some other consideration?
Also, there's a lot of development up North. If we don't plan some heavy rail there now, we never will.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 5:12 pm
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
Isn't that line intended to be converted to a tramline?
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
Well, all indicators are that won't be happening anymore.
The Torrens Junction project, Port Dock Spur and Bowden Station redevelopment are all enginereed and built to heavy-rail standards. Its retention as a heavy rail corridor and electrification is very likely.
The Torrens Junction project, Port Dock Spur and Bowden Station redevelopment are all enginereed and built to heavy-rail standards. Its retention as a heavy rail corridor and electrification is very likely.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
trams would be a step backwards IMO. It should and likely will remain heavy rail.Ser Noit of Loit wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:18 pmIsn't that line intended to be converted to a tramline?
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
Of 4 options for Thi corridor, 3 of them recommended light rail, mainly due to flexibility of multiple destinations. Except for those North of Semaphore, light rail will be just as quick, and more frequent if a dedicated rail corridor is used through the parklands instead of port road.Kasey771 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:59 amtrams would be a step backwards IMO. It should and likely will remain heavy rail.Ser Noit of Loit wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:18 pmIsn't that line intended to be converted to a tramline?
Have to agree with Shuz though, it appears as though upgrade of heavy rail now appears to be the preferred option, so say good bye to West Lakesand Semaphore road spurs, and quite possibly the grange line.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
Yep, for this reason electrifying the Belair line is a long way off.Mr Messy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:19 pmThe Sleeps Hill tunnel makes its very difficult to electrify the line. My understanding is it would require major works to install the lines due to its constructionrubberman wrote:I have no specific opinion myself, but once the Gawler electrification is done, wouldn't it be better to electrify the Hills line?
Would not electric traction produce a bigger improvement on the grades there? The Port line is flat, and the diesels would find that less of a challenge.
or is there some other consideration?
Also, there's a lot of development up North. If we don't plan some heavy rail there now, we never will.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
- Llessur2002
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2073
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
- Location: Inner West
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
The obligatory 'before' shot of the National Rail Museum yard area which will become the new Port Adelaide railway station.
Hopefully this view should start to change soon...
Hopefully this view should start to change soon...
Last edited by Llessur2002 on Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1761
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
Not disagreeing or anything, but would it be any more difficult than the Torrens junction project?A-Town wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:13 pmYep, for this reason electrifying the Belair line is a long way off.Mr Messy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:19 pmThe Sleeps Hill tunnel makes its very difficult to electrify the line. My understanding is it would require major works to install the lines due to its constructionrubberman wrote:I have no specific opinion myself, but once the Gawler electrification is done, wouldn't it be better to electrify the Hills line?
Would not electric traction produce a bigger improvement on the grades there? The Port line is flat, and the diesels would find that less of a challenge.
or is there some other consideration?
Also, there's a lot of development up North. If we don't plan some heavy rail there now, we never will.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
Yes, because they would have to somehow resize the existing tunnel or dig a new one through sandy soil
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
Electrifying Sleeps Hill tunnel is not that great a problem, you do not need complicated catenary, one simply fixes a conducting rod directly to the roof of the tunnel and the pantagraphs automatically adjust the any change in heights.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2436
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
OR just make the tunnel deeper by digging out the ground below the tracks and lowering them. It could be done, I think the problem is more the fact that electrifying the Belair line would present issues with timing of such a long single line system, I'd presume they'd need to move freight north before any such consideration was made to electrify, in which case I'd also hope they'd consider extending it back out as far as Bridgwater if not Mt. Barker or Murray Bridge...
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
I recommend Aldinga needs a train service asap because the population could support it, also maybe even a branch line servicing Seaford Vista and McLaren Vale
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Network
When electrification was first announced in 2008 all the metropolitan lines were to be converted to standard gauge by 2013 and all new work since then has used dual gauge sleepers. if this is done we would not have 2 single lines between Adelaide and Belair then trains could return to Bridgewater and extend to Mount Barker. It is all a question of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 41 guests