lol. Yeh ok, they exclusively target non-socialist (non-Labor/Greens) politicians to get them ousted from office, but they're an apolitical group.rhino wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 11:07 amLOL I'm cherry picking. And you're not supplying a source.
This goes in the Rev's Outrageous Opinions box until you do.
I suppose the three times the courts looked into GetUp last year, at the instigation of Tony Abbott, Eric Abetz, Peter Dutton, etc, the courts cherry picked too? They found GetUp to be a legitimate apolitical group, remember?
Your rhetoric actually reminds me of Eric Abetz
Pushing a socialist political agenda, have Labor socialists on their boards, but nah, apolitical.
Can't make this stuff up
I knew you wouldn't do it and you would react the way you did. You are so typically predictable. Usual socialist nonsense, unable to deal in pure facts but rather twisting reality and trying to deflect. Anything but talking about what isn't convenient that shines a light on things socialists would rather keep out of the light.
Good to know we have a Getup member on this site, puts your posts into perspective, especially how upset you get over criticism of Bill Shorten. Like how he managed to outspend a sitting Prime Minister by $60,000~ a month
Being a member of Getup Rhino you should know that Getup them selves even disclosed some of their foreign funding. Why are you playing dumb on this fact for?
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/getup-discl ... -donations
Should we delve into the people who started Getup and the funding they received from George Sorros' socialist foundations, Bill Shorten's union money, or the CFMEU?
Should we dig up the facts that Wikileaks brought to light about these people?
Just for a giggle...
they're apolitical he says
But nice attempt at slandering and discrediting me with nonsense such as "Revs Outrageous Opinions Box". Here in case you skipped over it because the truth isn't convenient for socialist minions... https://www.sbs.com.au/news/getup-discl ... -donations