Page 3 of 25

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:16 pm
by Burger
That's great Scooter Guy - where/how the hell did you find it?

Some of the people in that ad are still there too, minus the big hair and shoulder pads.

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:30 pm
by The Scooter Guy
Burger wrote:That's great Scooter Guy - where/how the hell did you find it?

Some of the people in that ad are still there too, minus the big hair and shoulder pads.
This was uploaded by a South Australian user known as 'd0nkeyshines'. He has a big collection of ads, indents, etc.

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:21 pm
by JamesXander
It was more of general statement about these mega shopping entres.


Westfield posted a loss last year, because of their huge debts due to construction. Which is crazy when you consider their Aussie opersations are near 100% occupancy, and their rents are famously expensive (omg my business sold $4m of stock last year!....but I made a 40,000 profit, omg whats going on (you wouldnt believe how often this happens))

DFO is another example, although different circumstances.

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 7:00 pm
by fishinajar
Burger wrote:That's great Scooter Guy - where/how the hell did you find it?

Some of the people in that ad are still there too, minus the big hair and shoulder pads.
Good find Scooter Guy.

I just couldn't stop thinking of the Seinfeld series

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 7:14 pm
by The Scooter Guy
fishinajar wrote:
Burger wrote:That's great Scooter Guy - where/how the hell did you find it?

Some of the people in that ad are still there too, minus the big hair and shoulder pads.
Good find Scooter Guy.

I just couldn't stop thinking of the Seinfeld series
d0nkeyshines also has ads of the Golden Grove suburb, Sofa Shop & Cash Converters from the 1990s!

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:49 pm
by Mants
oh the old atrium!! i had a dream about this years ago and never knew where it was. now i do. gee!

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:44 pm
by flat04
JamesXander wrote:Westfield posted a loss last year, because of their huge debts due to construction.
James, you might be our next Mayor but you wont be our next CPA at this rate. You do realise the effect of asset devaluation on profit figures don't you? Westfields business as such made a profit, just that the asset write-downs causes a loss on the profit and loss statement.
That's why when the commercial property market turns around causing an increase in property valuations Westfields profit will ramp up again.

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:27 pm
by rogue
Crane going up today....

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 1:56 am
by Mants
crane is up...well, the jib still needs to be attached

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:35 pm
by Pikey
Mants wrote:crane is up...well, the jib still needs to be attached
Is it a hammerhead or a luffing crane?

I usually wouldn't ask, but I'm over in Perth at the moment.

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:59 pm
by ghs
Hammerhead mate, I drove past very early this morning and the boom was not up, but I was
surprised to see fixed crane on a smaller scale project like this.

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:58 am
by JamesXander
flat04 wrote:
JamesXander wrote:Westfield posted a loss last year, because of their huge debts due to construction.
James, you might be our next Mayor but you wont be our next CPA at this rate. You do realise the effect of asset devaluation on profit figures don't you? Westfields business as such made a profit, just that the asset write-downs causes a loss on the profit and loss statement.
That's why when the commercial property market turns around causing an increase in property valuations Westfields profit will ramp up again.

I can't honestly say I looked into it a whole lot, just I know they fund alot of their expansions with debt. I understand a devaluation of an asset affects profit. However I assumed due to the increases in costs of funding major projects etc that it affected their bottom line. Did they write down their US business? Cause their Australian arm still has near 100% occupancy?

Myyyy bad.


None th less Its a shame they charge huge rents, the retailers do the hard work. But thats business hey.

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:07 am
by Mants
ghs wrote:Hammerhead mate, I drove past very early this morning and the boom was not up, but I was
surprised to see fixed crane on a smaller scale project like this.
correct. it's a pretty huge crane. emphasised by the fact that in it's present location, it sticks out like a sore thumb

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 3:07 pm
by ghs
The boom is massive... it was reaching out over the road when I drove past.

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 3:26 pm
by Xaragmata
From yesterday - the site is irregular, roughly L shaped & extending from Sydney Street across to Portrush Rd, & then south along Portrush.
A receiving bay is in Sydney Street & the crane can place materials on most of the site. Large tree is on an "island" of soil in what will be the
basement car park.

Image


Image


Image


Image


Image
(not entirely accurate, as eastern Sydney Street footpath is closed for receiving bay, and site extends further south along Portrush)


Image


Image


http://xaragmata.mooo.com/album/adelaid ... _1216.html