[SWP] Brougham Place | 54m | 4 x up to 16lvls | Mixed Use

[Spurdo]

Yeah no worries
You keep your horses houses

Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk
[/quote]

If that's how it works then shouldn't it be ok to knock down the tram barn at the botanic gardens, after all it's just a tram house or how about the epworth building as its just a c or d grade office building.

Just because it isn't pretty or its past use wasn't attractive or interesting doesn't mean it should be denied heritage listing. (Although obviously not everything deserves to be heritage listed)

[citywatcher]

Yeah no worries
You keep your horses houses

Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk

If that's how it works then shouldn't it be ok to knock down the tram barn at the botanic gardens, after all it's just a tram house or how about the epworth building as its just a c or d grade office building.

Just because it isn't pretty or its past use wasn't attractive or interesting doesn't mean it should be denied heritage listing. (Although obviously not everything deserves to be heritage listed)[/quote]You're last paragraph makes hilarious reading


Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk

[Ser Noit of Loit]

Some of you guys need to work on linking your quotes properly.

Also Adelaide is a big city (in area) so it's not like we're in dire straights for room and these stables need to be knocked down.

[HiTouch]

Some of you guys need to work on linking your quotes properly.

Also Adelaide is a big city (in area) so it's not like we're in dire straights for room and these stables need to be knocked down.

That’s my point. Adelaide has enough room for both heritage and development. Some areas are more suited to one than the other. Some areas incorporate both and that’s not a bad thing. Brougham place is very much a heritage place with elements of development where Citywest, Grenfell, Franklin certainly have heritage elements but are very much CBD development areas.

It shouldn’t be hard for a developer to respect that. Most cities have this (except maybe the Gold Coast).

[Smithy85]

I think I’ve got the right thread.. Sounds like this is a goer:

https://www.realestate.com.au/news/new- ... aa:article

[SRW]

I think I’ve got the right thread.. Sounds like this is a goer:

https://www.realestate.com.au/news/new- ... aa:article

7 of 18 sold apparently, so indeed hopefully not far off. The article states construction starts this year but I'd be surprised if it starts before middle next.

[Sensation.Al]

I'm not sure if I follow but the 2017 amendments hasn't been approved, but the project is now out for pre-selling. AND construction is expected to start soon (I doubt it'll be this year); Has this received full development approval at all? Or is there any new amended application lodged?

[retsacerp]

AND construction is expected to start soon (I doubt it'll be this year)

hindmarsh have it out for trade pricing now, closing late october so might start early 2020.

[Ben]

Demolition is about to commence for stage 1.

[gnrc_louis]

Revisiting the plans on page 3 of this thread, if this development goes ahead in its entirety it'll really change the North Adelaide skyline quite dramatically - in a good way too imo.

[citywatcher]

Demolition is about to commence for stage 1.

What involves stage 1 Ben

Sent from my SM-J730G using Tapatalk

[Ben]

Demolition is about to commence for stage 1.

What involves stage 1 Ben

Sent from my SM-J730G using Tapatalk

You can see all the different stages on page 2. Although the designs have been tweaked it’s largely the same I believe.

[[Shuz]]

Stage 1 is the furthest away from O'Connell Street. 49 Brpugham Place.

[Ben]

I don’t know if anyone goes past this site but an application has been lodged for substructure now so demolition must be complete and construction about to commence?

[EBG]

I went passed about 2 weeks ago and there was no sign of any demolition or any building activity at all at least from Brougham place.