Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

Ideas and concepts of what Adelaide can be.

Should we build an underground railway from North Terrace to Keswick

Poll ended at Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:24 pm

Yes immediately - not only would it be very useful, but it's just the sort of countercyclical measure needed to keep SA out of the global depression!
5
15%
Yes - but we should wait for the revenue from the mining boom to flow first
4
12%
Yes eventually - but it won't be needed any time soon. We should make provision for it now, but wait a few decades before constructing it
9
26%
Maybe eventually - but we shouldn't let it affect current planning decisions
11
32%
No, but maybe someday we should build it somewhere else
2
6%
No, even if our population doubles we won't need one
2
6%
No, our state's going to remain a dried up backwater so we won't need one
1
3%
No, we will always be better off without one
0
No votes
Undecided
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 34

Message
Author
Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2135
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Location: Christies Beach

Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#1 Post by Aidan » Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:24 pm

My plan for a underground railway - see Adelaide CBD and Underground Railways in the Visions and Suggestions section - would conflict with the plans for a tower at 51 Pirie Stret. I was surprised by the number of people who seemed to regard one office tower as more important than an underground railway. So what does everyone think of the idea of a railway under Adelaide?
Image
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#2 Post by AtD » Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:03 pm

Read the state budget and ask us again. :)

Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2135
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Location: Christies Beach

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#3 Post by Aidan » Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:25 pm

AtD wrote:Read the state budget and ask us again. :)
That's why I included the second option.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#4 Post by Norman » Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:28 pm

While I do agree that we will eventually need an underground railway, I have a different view on how it should run:
Image

It's part of a broader plan I will release soon.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2675
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#5 Post by Ho Really » Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:41 pm

Norman wrote:While I do agree that we will eventually need an underground railway, I have a different view on how it should run...

[...]

...It's part of a broader plan I will release soon.
This is one of the many options I've thought of too. I like it because it uses the parklands for the corners and entry/exits at City Campus West and Mile End where there are embankments. Just need to know where to send my graphic for posting.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#6 Post by Norman » Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:48 pm

Ho Really wrote:
Norman wrote:While I do agree that we will eventually need an underground railway, I have a different view on how it should run...

[...]

...It's part of a broader plan I will release soon.
This is one of the many options I've thought of too. I like it because it uses the parklands for the corners and entry/exits at City Campus West and Mile End where there are embankments. Just need to know where to send my graphic for posting.

Cheers
There are many options out there, like Flickr, Windows Live Photos...

User avatar
Zills
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:59 pm

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#7 Post by Zills » Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:43 am

i voted yes (option 1) but i like your plan better norman!

ozisnowman
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#8 Post by ozisnowman » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:01 am

Yes and the planning should start now. Four lines should go through the station.
The main lines should be Gawler - Belair (Express stoping at only major stops), Gawler - Belair (All stations)
Outer Harbour - Norlunga(Express stoping at only major stops), Outer Harbour - Norlunga (All stations)
the Grange and Tonsley lines would share the Outer Harbour - Norlunga lines....

Victoria Square should be set up as a Grand Central Station (Underground) and the trains would thus be
through trains, no waiting as per the current Dead End Station at North Terrace.

User avatar
adam_stuckey
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 9:07 am
Location: The Pissant town

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#9 Post by adam_stuckey » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:17 am

I've thought this would be great for ages but its more of a Shelbyville idea hahaha. Are there any train lines to the easterly suburbs? I 'm not sure but if there is this would be a perfect way to connect them. Otherwise maybe make the circle line bigger to include Hackney, Norwood, and then down to Parkside but maybe a tramline might be an easier option for that
To try to put it in some sort of perspective the World Cup is as big as having 2 grand finals a day for a month

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#10 Post by Norman » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:27 am

ozisnowman wrote:Yes and the planning should start now. Four lines should go through the station.
The main lines should be Gawler - Belair (Express stoping at only major stops), Gawler - Belair (All stations)
Outer Harbour - Norlunga(Express stoping at only major stops), Outer Harbour - Norlunga (All stations)
the Grange and Tonsley lines would share the Outer Harbour - Norlunga lines....

Victoria Square should be set up as a Grand Central Station (Underground) and the trains would thus be
through trains, no waiting as per the current Dead End Station at North Terrace.
Err, I don't think the Belair Line warrants as many trains as the Gawler line (let alone can the Belair Line handle them). If anything, it should be Noarlunga <-> Gawler and Belair <-> Outer Harbor.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2675
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#11 Post by Ho Really » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:51 am

Ho Really wrote:This is one of the many options I've thought of too. I like it because it uses the parklands for the corners and entry/exits at City Campus West and Mile End where there are embankments. Just need to know where to send my graphic for posting.
Thanks Norman, I did a Google and found this place Shutterfly. I hope it serves the purpose.

Here's that graphic I did with the Adelaide Gaol curve. I didn't include the straight bits of line but you can visualise that. There are probably other options I didn't include here as I did this quickly yesterday afternoon after I took Aidan's suggestion of the 200 metre radius of the curves.

Image

As you can see Norman I did this before I saw your option. We think alike. :wink:

I've got another graphic that includes options for a line to the Airport using the Keswick drain, but I seem to have missplaced it. When I'll find it I'll post in the relevant thread I started a while back (maybe two years now?) on the Airport link.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
omada
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Eden Hills

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#12 Post by omada » Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:04 am

Well I voted "maybe in the future" as I am pretty ignorant of such matters.

I need someone explain to me the tangible benefits (apart from uber-coolness) of spending $1 billion plus on an underground railway.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#13 Post by Wayno » Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:08 pm

i like normans approach of following the main road arteries - presumably helps avoid clashes with deep building foundations...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2135
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Location: Christies Beach

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#14 Post by Aidan » Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:27 pm

ozisnowman wrote:Yes and the planning should start now. Four lines should go through the station.
I'm not quite sure what you mean here, but there is no need to involve the Outer Harbour or Belair lines. They're better off as light rail, running along the existing line on North Terrace and King William Street with only minor alterations. An Angas Street branch is also a possibility. In combination with the tunnel, it would give the entire City a good rail service.

omada wrote:Well I voted "maybe in the future" as I am pretty ignorant of such matters.

I need someone explain to me the tangible benefits (apart from uber-coolness) of spending $1 billion plus on an underground railway.
The main benefit is that it would enable trains to directly serve much more of the City. This would result in a significant modal shift from cars to trains, freeing up space on Adelaide's roads. We have already seen how congestion can turn a small increase in the amount of traffic into a large increase in journey time. This would have the opposite effect. And as the trains would be electric, it would reduce pollution.

There would be significant user benefits from the reduction in journey time, particularly for southern suburbs residents who currently have to go round the City before being deposited on the edge of it.

It would encourage CBD development, as land that would otherwise be required for parking could be put to a more productive use.

And as it would join up the Gawler and Noarlunga lines, it would also make cross city commuting much easier.

Ho Really wrote:Here's that graphic I did with the Adelaide Gaol curve. I didn't include the straight bits of line but you can visualise that. There are probably other options I didn't include here as I did this quickly yesterday afternoon after I took Aidan's suggestion of the 200 metre radius of the curves.
Maps typically exaggerate street widths, so it's best to use satellite view instead. This also gives you some indication of exactly what the tunnels would be going under.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6393
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Poll: Should Adelaide have an underground railway

#15 Post by Norman » Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:54 pm

Wayno wrote:i like normans approach of following the main road arteries - presumably helps avoid clashes with deep building foundations...
Precisely. It would also be easy and cheap to implement, as cut-and-cover could be used. North Terrace, Wakefield Street and Grote Street are all wide boulevards that would make implementing an underground easy. The westerly exit also provides an oppertunity to create a city loop, making best use of limited railcar resources. Adelaide Station can also be returned to serve interstate trains and diesel services, while Underground lines use a station located next to the railway station just underneath the current tram stop. More on that later.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests