Atira Waymouth Street Building

Anything goes here.. :) Now with Beer Garden for our smoking patrons.
morty137
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 1:10 pm

Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by morty137 »

Hi Guys,

I've started petition for council to step up and do something about this ugly building. This is disgrace for CBD.
Appreciate if you guys could sign it.

https://www.change.org/p/nick-xenophon- ... k-and-feel

PS: My first language isn't English, but I hope people get the message.

Thanks,
MortyC137
User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5995
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by Norman »

I'm not exactly sure what the council would do against this building, unless it is not built to the approved specifications and plans. Some people might even like it...
morty137
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 1:10 pm

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by morty137 »

I think there is a law saying that new building should be sync with the areas other building. Am I correct?. This law is clearly broken and its so ugly. I am sure value of neighboring building will be also effected by this crap as prospective buyers looking for great view skies. Council and law makers should able to force owners to modify building appearance otherwise demolished.
User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1556
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: West Croydon

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by Llessur2002 »

I quite like it. When the surrounding area is built up it will stick out far less than it does now...
User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3270
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by Nathan »

:roll:

Personal aesthetic preference does not factor into "law". You're wasting your time.
User avatar
timtam20292
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1168
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by timtam20292 »

:roll:

I’m not bothered by the building either.
User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5995
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by Norman »

morty137 wrote:I think there is a law saying that new building should be sync with the areas other building. Am I correct?. This law is clearly broken and its so ugly. I am sure value of neighboring building will be also effected by this crap as prospective buyers looking for great view skies. Council and law makers should able to force owners to modify building appearance otherwise demolished.
The building can only be demolished if it is not the same as the development application that was approved. It was always going to be controversial, but just because you don't like it doesn't mean it will be demolished.
morty137
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 1:10 pm

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by morty137 »

If we let this building go unnoticed, many developers will start building this kind of cheap crap around the CBD to earn more profit. I am appalled by the Council decision to approve this building in the first place. Who ever responsible for approval must be investigated for possible corruption. I know many guys may not bother much as this is just a one building. Now lets put 10-20 around CBD and see how that will look. Adevertiser has carried several news article about this building and many people found its very ugly and offensive. You can read comments section in those new articles. So its not me find this building ugly. To be honest this building looks like a big chicken cage than human accommodation. Its neither futuristic nor classic.
User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 2899
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: City

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by SRW »

Again, that's your opinion.

The opinion of others and myself is that the building is interesting and attractive.

Either way, opinion is not grounds for the kind of action you're proposing.

What matters in development is whether proposals meet community-guided plans. This building did.

If you feel so passionately, seek instead to change the development plan or get involved in the consultation phase of the next proposed building you dislike.

As for this building, it's built. Get over it.
Last edited by SRW on Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Keep Adelaide Weird
User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5995
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by Norman »

The DAC (now SCAP) approved the development, not the council. And I wouldn't use the Advertiser comments section as a litmus test of the community.
User avatar
Matt
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: London

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by Matt »

Good lord. Get a grip.
User avatar
Howie
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4816
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:55 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by Howie »

Good architecture has a way of polarising people. You can’t say that it looks bland, and it does generate quite a bit of attention. I myself quite like the design.
YellowRoad
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:04 am

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by YellowRoad »

Is this the same guy that started up the petition to have Parafield airport moved? There are far more worthwhile causes to focus your energy on.
crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5434
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by crawf »

Love it, or hate it.

It's built, get over it.
Nort
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1367
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

Re: Atira Waymouth Street Building

Post by Nort »

It's built now, it's there. Although I think it would make sense for the developers to look what they can do with the building finish simply because it's currently embarrassing to include in their portfolio.

I do think there should be stricter guidelines on renders put forward when a building is being approved to ensure they are closer to what is going to be built:

Image

Sure you will always have ideal lighting and a bit of creative license in renders, but that is just taking the mickey. :lol:

As has been said though, the developers built what their application said they were going to, if you want the building demolished exactly who do you propose pays for it?
Post Reply