Actually Shuz the DAC rejected the initial proposal. This current one is a "rejig" but is effectively the same so I wouldn't be too confident if I were the developers.[Shuz] wrote: Just because developers do it in Europe and Asia, does not make it right here. Unfortunately, I have my doubts in the DAC's capability to make the right decision. I am led to believe that the DAC have never rejected a proposal; they have rubber-stamped every proposal and amendment to date ever since its inception.
[CAN] 260 Pulteney Street | 46m | 15lvls | Apartments
[CAN] Re: PRO: 260 Pulteney Street | 46m | 15 Lvls | Stu Apart
[CAN] Re: PRO: 260 Pulteney Street | 46m | 15 Lvls | Stu Apart
Funny you mention that. In my original post, I was going to put an asterisk after proposal* with the fine print to include amendments. I guess I should've done mentioned that.Ben wrote:Actually Shuz the DAC rejected the initial proposal. This current one is a "rejig" but is effectively the same so I wouldn't be too confident if I were the developers.[Shuz] wrote: Just because developers do it in Europe and Asia, does not make it right here. Unfortunately, I have my doubts in the DAC's capability to make the right decision. I am led to believe that the DAC have never rejected a proposal; they have rubber-stamped every proposal and amendment to date ever since its inception.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
[CAN] Re: PRO: 260 Pulteney Street | 46m | 15 Lvls | Stu Apart
Despite the accusations of some, to show that the DAC is not just a rubber stamp, at its upcoming meeting this August 25, it is expected to REFUSE this proposal.
[CAN] Re: PRO: 260 Pulteney Street | 46m | 15 Lvls | Stu Apart
Thank god. Sanity now!
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
[CAN] PRO: 260 Pulteney Street | 46m | 15 Lvls | Stu Apart
From the new Tangcheng website:
In November 2010, the company bought the fourth site which is located in 260 Pultney Street, Adelaide SA 5000. This site is the smallest site of four sites, the site area is about 240 square meters, but the site is in the center of the CBD, the maximum building height is up to 40 meters. This project has been designed as 15 levels of student accommodation. The design concept is the same as the King William project’s. At present, it is preparing to submit the planning application.
In November 2010, the company bought the fourth site which is located in 260 Pultney Street, Adelaide SA 5000. This site is the smallest site of four sites, the site area is about 240 square meters, but the site is in the center of the CBD, the maximum building height is up to 40 meters. This project has been designed as 15 levels of student accommodation. The design concept is the same as the King William project’s. At present, it is preparing to submit the planning application.
[CAN] Re: PRO: 260 Pulteney Street | 46m | 15 Lvls | Stu Apart
I know one shouldn't judge by what are clearly 'preliminary' renders but this view looks much better than it's now under sight works sister on King William Street. Must be a sucker for the sky reflected in glass look...
[CAN] Re: PRO: 260 Pulteney Street | 46m | 15lvls | Apartments
This site is now up for sale again so unlikely that the proposed building will go ahead.
Can't say I am disappointed...
Can't say I am disappointed...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 83 guests