[CAN] 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6391
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[CAN] Re: [PRO] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#106 Post by Norman » Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:01 am

citywatcher wrote:
Tue Jul 27, 2021 9:34 am
rev wrote:
Patrick_27 wrote:
Mon Jul 26, 2021 10:02 pm
And right there in this article is my reason for being somewhat skeptical of the quality of the final product... $72m price tag for two 108m buildings.
There's good odds it'll turn out cheap looking.
Advertiser price tag aside, its a prime location and entry to the city. If anything actually gets built this time. I wouldn't be surprised if there's another 2 or 3 proposals in the coming years before an unimaginative stumpy square box is built.
Probably closer to the mark
Only an overseas consortium will build anything of AAA quality here

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk
I disagree. Realm turned out great, and that was an Australian investor. The same goes with the Central Market Arcade.

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2160
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[CAN] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#107 Post by Nort » Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:30 am

That cost seems a little low, but there's no context for where the cost comes from and this is really just one tower that splits into two sections. Despite being "two towers" it seems like it would have a lower floor area than something like the new Sofitel.

citywatcher
Legendary Member!
Posts: 866
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:51 pm

[CAN] Re: [PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#108 Post by citywatcher » Tue Jul 27, 2021 12:09 pm

Norman wrote:
citywatcher wrote:
Tue Jul 27, 2021 9:34 am
rev wrote: There's good odds it'll turn out cheap looking.
Advertiser price tag aside, its a prime location and entry to the city. If anything actually gets built this time. I wouldn't be surprised if there's another 2 or 3 proposals in the coming years before an unimaginative stumpy square box is built.
Probably closer to the mark
Only an overseas consortium will build anything of AAA quality here

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk
I disagree. Realm turned out great, and that was an Australian investor. The same goes with the Central Market Arcade.
Yeah but Realm didn't cost $36m and Central Arcade not built yet to judge
By AAA I mean Barrangaroo type world class quality although yes , Realm is very good.

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk


Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2160
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[CAN] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#109 Post by Nort » Tue Jul 27, 2021 1:46 pm

Obviously it's a few years now since Realm was announced, but wasn't that announced as a $100 million build? Doesn't seem terrible for a tower 3/4 of its height to have 3/4 of the cost if so.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6029
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[CAN] Re: [PRO] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#110 Post by rev » Tue Jul 27, 2021 6:07 pm

Norman wrote:
Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:01 am
citywatcher wrote:
Tue Jul 27, 2021 9:34 am
rev wrote:
There's good odds it'll turn out cheap looking.
Advertiser price tag aside, its a prime location and entry to the city. If anything actually gets built this time. I wouldn't be surprised if there's another 2 or 3 proposals in the coming years before an unimaginative stumpy square box is built.
Probably closer to the mark
Only an overseas consortium will build anything of AAA quality here

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk
I disagree. Realm turned out great, and that was an Australian investor. The same goes with the Central Market Arcade.
Realm looks nice. But let's be honest, that's by Adelaide standards and there isn't much else to compare it to here.
We're starved of quality tower designs. Globally it wouldn't really stand out as much as it does here.

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2160
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[CAN] Re: [PRO] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#111 Post by Nort » Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:24 pm

rev wrote:
Tue Jul 27, 2021 6:07 pm
Norman wrote:
Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:01 am
citywatcher wrote:
Tue Jul 27, 2021 9:34 am
Probably closer to the mark
Only an overseas consortium will build anything of AAA quality here

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk
I disagree. Realm turned out great, and that was an Australian investor. The same goes with the Central Market Arcade.
Realm looks nice. But let's be honest, that's by Adelaide standards and there isn't much else to compare it to here.
We're starved of quality tower designs. Globally it wouldn't really stand out as much as it does here.
Yeah but theres plenty of people in Adelaide who are proud of their out of date views on things.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7478
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[CAN] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#112 Post by Ben » Thu Jul 29, 2021 7:45 pm

This was approved. Massive step towards taller buildings across the cbd.

Jaymz
Legendary Member!
Posts: 972
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm

[CAN] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#113 Post by Jaymz » Thu Jul 29, 2021 8:23 pm

Ben wrote:
Thu Jul 29, 2021 7:45 pm
This was approved. Massive step towards taller buildings across the cbd.
Maybe approved, but we've seen hundreds of things approved on this forum that never got built. How confident are you of this one going ahead?

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2067
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

[CAN] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#114 Post by Llessur2002 » Thu Jul 29, 2021 8:39 pm

I think it's more the approval that's important here - as this proves the current height limits based on air traffic are not set in stone.

cmet
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 245
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 3:03 pm

[CAN] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#115 Post by cmet » Thu Jul 29, 2021 11:49 pm

Nort wrote:Obviously it's a few years now since Realm was announced, but wasn't that announced as a $100 million build? Doesn't seem terrible for a tower 3/4 of its height to have 3/4 of the cost if so.
Final price for Realm was touching 150m

citywatcher
Legendary Member!
Posts: 866
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:51 pm

[CAN] Re: [APP] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#116 Post by citywatcher » Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:33 am

cmet wrote:
Nort wrote:Obviously it's a few years now since Realm was announced, but wasn't that announced as a $100 million build? Doesn't seem terrible for a tower 3/4 of its height to have 3/4 of the cost if so.
Final price for Realm was touching 150m
Pretty stupid to think that because it's three quarters the height it should be three quarters the cost. How tall should the new RAH be then?

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk


User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6391
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[CAN] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#117 Post by Norman » Fri Jul 30, 2021 9:05 am

Maybe someone can correct me on this, but I recall that the planning fees for a development application correspond to the value of the development. This might explain why developers always try to quote the lowest price possible, even if it doesn't correspond to the actual cost of building the development.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3209
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[CAN] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#118 Post by [Shuz] » Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:47 am

Correct, however it is a bit obvious it is a flawed system.

It should correspond to the size of the size of the development so something like the gross floor area of the proposal.

I'm just pulling figures out of thin air for arguments sake, so hypothetically something like $10 per square metre for a 30,000sqm development would equate to $300,000 in planning assessment fees.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2160
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[CAN] Re: [APP] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#119 Post by Nort » Fri Jul 30, 2021 12:01 pm

citywatcher wrote:
Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:33 am
cmet wrote:
Nort wrote:Obviously it's a few years now since Realm was announced, but wasn't that announced as a $100 million build? Doesn't seem terrible for a tower 3/4 of its height to have 3/4 of the cost if so.
Final price for Realm was touching 150m
Pretty stupid to think that because it's three quarters the height it should be three quarters the cost. How tall should the new RAH be then?

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk
For a rough ballpark comparison for two buildings where the floors are regular and repeat most elements it seems a lot less stupid than trying to compare a residential/hotel tower to a state of the art medical facility but you do you.

citywatcher
Legendary Member!
Posts: 866
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:51 pm

[CAN] Re: [APP] Re: [APP] Re: 1-8 North Terrace | 108m | 2 x 32 Levels | Apartments

#120 Post by citywatcher » Fri Jul 30, 2021 12:18 pm

Nort wrote:
citywatcher wrote:
Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:33 am
cmet wrote: Final price for Realm was touching 150m
Pretty stupid to think that because it's three quarters the height it should be three quarters the cost. How tall should the new RAH be then?

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk
For a rough ballpark comparison for two buildings where the floors are regular and repeat most elements it seems a lot less stupid than trying to compare a residential/hotel tower to a state of the art medical facility but you do you.
No but the fittings and finishes are the ultimate determinant
And we were comparing two projects of primarily the same purpose
So dumb

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], flat04, Google [Bot] and 32 guests