[U/C] Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 130m | 39 levels

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6022
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#226 Post by rev » Wed Nov 03, 2021 5:19 pm

Llessur2002 wrote:
Wed Nov 03, 2021 3:29 pm
VinyTapestry849 wrote:
Wed Nov 03, 2021 2:57 pm
If its overseas investors then its just more evidence that supports my claim; there's demand for high-rise developments from overseas. :lol:
And if true, may result in low occupancy rates and a reduced level of activation of the surrounding area. Not necessarily a great outcome for the city.
Millions in rent going offshore, terrible outcome.
Some countries are very strict with who can own property, in Australia we let anyone. The North Korean dictator could probably manage to buy a penthouse here.

HiTouch
Legendary Member!
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#227 Post by HiTouch » Wed Nov 03, 2021 5:23 pm

It's definitely not desirable. There are whole city blocks in Sydney that are foreign owned and nobody lives in any of the properties. Especially around Lidcombe. It's horrible.

VinyTapestry849
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#228 Post by VinyTapestry849 » Wed Nov 03, 2021 6:01 pm

Probably best If there's a balance

A-Town
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2017 10:14 am

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#229 Post by A-Town » Wed Nov 03, 2021 8:53 pm

HiTouch wrote:
Wed Nov 03, 2021 5:23 pm
It's definitely not desirable. There are whole city blocks in Sydney that are foreign owned and nobody lives in any of the properties. Especially around Lidcombe. It's horrible.
Melbourne too, most notably the north-western CBD high rises and Docklands. The laws definitely need to change.

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2072
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#230 Post by AG » Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:08 am

If you are not an Australian or New Zealand permanent resident, FIRB rules indicate that you cannot buy an established residential property. However, there is nothing stopping the purchase of brand new off the plan residential purchases (or any commercial/industrial purchases, subject to FIRB approval) - hence why there's so many overseas investors buying up apartments.

User avatar
Algernon
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:46 pm
Location: Moravia

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#231 Post by Algernon » Thu Nov 04, 2021 6:12 pm

AG wrote:
Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:08 am
If you are not an Australian or New Zealand permanent resident, FIRB rules indicate that you cannot buy an established residential property. However, there is nothing stopping the purchase of brand new off the plan residential purchases (or any commercial/industrial purchases, subject to FIRB approval) - hence why there's so many overseas investors buying up apartments.
Hence it's foreign investment that results in something that we both want and need: the construction of new housing stock (and not just inflating the price of the existing stock).

User avatar
PeFe
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1624
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:47 am

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#232 Post by PeFe » Sat Nov 13, 2021 2:24 pm

Two page advertisement for this development in the Weekend Australian. Never seen that before for an Adelaide apartment development. Also an article in the Real Estate section flogging off the $10 million dollar penthouse.
IMG_20211113_145008.jpg

citywatcher
Legendary Member!
Posts: 866
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:51 pm

[U/C] Re: [APP] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#233 Post by citywatcher » Sat Nov 13, 2021 2:54 pm

Algernon wrote:
AG wrote:
Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:08 am
If you are not an Australian or New Zealand permanent resident, FIRB rules indicate that you cannot buy an established residential property. However, there is nothing stopping the purchase of brand new off the plan residential purchases (or any commercial/industrial purchases, subject to FIRB approval) - hence why there's so many overseas investors buying up apartments.
Hence it's foreign investment that results in something that we both want and need: the construction of new housing stock (and not just inflating the price of the existing stock).
Average person doesn't need a 40 storey apartment block.

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk


VinyTapestry849
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#234 Post by VinyTapestry849 » Sun Nov 14, 2021 4:21 pm

My god the hilton is ugly. The sooner this starts the better.
Attachments
hilton-hotel-on-victoria.jpg

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#235 Post by SRW » Sun Nov 14, 2021 7:32 pm

VinyTapestry849 wrote:
Sun Nov 14, 2021 4:21 pm
My god the hilton is ugly. The sooner this starts the better.
The Market development won't much change the view you have shown? And I disagree re: the Hilton; it's terrible at podium level, but the tower itself is fine. The GHD/fmr SGIC building is the irredeemably ugly one IMO.
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
timtam20292
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1390
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#236 Post by timtam20292 » Sun Jan 02, 2022 12:43 pm

Chemist Warehouse has relocated across the road on Gouger Street in preparation for this development.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3766
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#237 Post by Nathan » Sun Jan 02, 2022 2:13 pm

timtam20292 wrote:
Sun Jan 02, 2022 12:43 pm
Chemist Warehouse has relocated across the road on Gouger Street in preparation for this development.
Thank fuck for that. Totally out of place for having a frontage in the market.

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2157
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#238 Post by Nort » Sun Jan 02, 2022 10:24 pm

Nathan wrote:
Sun Jan 02, 2022 2:13 pm
timtam20292 wrote:
Sun Jan 02, 2022 12:43 pm
Chemist Warehouse has relocated across the road on Gouger Street in preparation for this development.
Thank fuck for that. Totally out of place for having a frontage in the market.
I'd suggest it's more a move since the site is being demolished rather than appropriateness for the location.

User avatar
timtam20292
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1390
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#239 Post by timtam20292 » Sun Jan 02, 2022 11:12 pm

Nort wrote:
Sun Jan 02, 2022 10:24 pm
Nathan wrote:
Sun Jan 02, 2022 2:13 pm
timtam20292 wrote:
Sun Jan 02, 2022 12:43 pm
Chemist Warehouse has relocated across the road on Gouger Street in preparation for this development.
Thank fuck for that. Totally out of place for having a frontage in the market.
I'd suggest it's more a move since the site is being demolished rather than appropriateness for the location.
Correct.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3766
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

[U/C] Re: Central Market Arcade Redevelopment | 124m | 38 levels

#240 Post by Nathan » Mon Jan 03, 2022 12:43 pm

Nort wrote:
Sun Jan 02, 2022 10:24 pm
Nathan wrote:
Sun Jan 02, 2022 2:13 pm
timtam20292 wrote:
Sun Jan 02, 2022 12:43 pm
Chemist Warehouse has relocated across the road on Gouger Street in preparation for this development.
Thank fuck for that. Totally out of place for having a frontage in the market.
I'd suggest it's more a move since the site is being demolished rather than appropriateness for the location.
No doubt, but it's still good to get them out of there.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 20 guests