[REJ] Glenburnie Tce and Gray St., Plympton

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2549
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

[REJ] Glenburnie Tce and Gray St., Plympton

Post by Ho Really »

State Commission Assessment Panel refuses plan for six-storey development at Plympton
Kaysee Miller, The Messenger
June 2, 2020 9:29am


Plans for a six-storey apartment building at Plympton have been refused by the State Government’s development panel.

If approved, the Glenburnie Tce and Gray St development would have housed 35 two-bedroom apartments spread across five storeys with storage cages located on a mezzanine level and underground carparking.

Despite being located on a suburban street, the block is zoned as an “urban corridor” and is subject to the same height restriction as Anzac Highway, which allows a maximum of eight storeys.

The site currently hosts just a single storey building and is surrounded largely by single storey homes.

A number of nearby residents opposed the plans when they were initially lodged in August last year.

At the time, a West Torrens Councillor labelled the development “unsightly” and “definitely not” appropriate for its location.

Following feedback from West Torrens Council, the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI), and a government architect, an extra three apartments were added to plans for the building in March this year.

The size of each apartment was increased meaning one fewer apartment could be accommodated on each level so the developer – Plympton Apartments Pty Ltd – introduced a sixth floor to the project.

Last week, the State Commission Assessment Panel (SCAP) moved to refuse development plan consent for the site.

It said the proposal was considered an overdevelopment of the site.

In its decision, the SCAP acknowledged “urban corridor” zoning intended to encourage residential development but there were difficulties with the current streetscape.

“The SCAP appreciates the difficulties in dealing with a transition to a new desired character but believes that the proposal pushes the extent of development on the site too far, resulting in incremental negative impacts,” the decision said.

Plympton Apartments can appeal the SCAP decision to the Environment, Resources and Development Court.

The Messenger
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
User avatar
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 4848
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[REJ] Re: Glenburnie Tce and Gray St., Plympton

Post by rev »

Probably a good move, the ground floor looks ok, but the upper 5 levels, ughh.
User avatar
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3323
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden

[REJ] Re: Glenburnie Tce and Gray St., Plympton

Post by Nathan »

Not to defend the building, because it's pretty average, but how can a six-storey building on a lot zoned for up to eight be considered an overdevelopment?
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 6:45 am

[REJ] Re: Glenburnie Tce and Gray St., Plympton

Post by TorrensSA »

The block is probably too small, not sure what number it is but 1 Glenburnie Tce is an odd shape and 1000sqm and number 2 is a rectangle but only 680sqm The street is also narrow and lacks on street parking. It looks too bulky for the site.
Post Reply