Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
-
rhino
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
- Location: Nairne
#1
Post
by rhino » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:46 pm
I didn't realize this bypass proposal (probably not in this exact form) has been around since 1951!
Winemaker Treasury Wine Estates in fight against Penola bypass road through its vineyard
MEREDITH BOOTH From: The Advertiser October 25, 2010 5:50PM
WYNNS' wines owner Treasury Wine Estates is spending a "significant'' amount on a five-week advertising campaign against a planned $21 million Penola bypass road through one of its vineyards in the Coonawarra wine region.
Kicking off its campaign last weekend with a full page ad in News Limited's The Weekend Australian, Treasury likens the Council's planned road through ``terra rossa'' soil vineyards as ``viticultural destruction''.
Treasury, owned by Foster's Group, expects the campaign to run in national, South Australian and regional newspapers and online media for at least five weeks leading up to Wattle Range Council elections on November 13, a spokeswoman said.
It is urging all council candidates to ``thoroughly review all heavy vehicle bypass alternatives''.
Wattle Range Council chief executive Frank Brennan said the bypass road, which would start 1.5km north of Penola and rejoin the Riddoch Highway 1.5km south of Penola, was needed to remove 550 trucks a day travelling through Penola's main street.
Heavy vehicle traffic was expected to increase to 700 a day if a Penola pulp mill development goes ahead, he said.
Local, State and Federal governments are expected to pitch in a combined $21 million to build the road.
Mr Brennan said the bypass, first mentioned at the council in 1951, has been the subject of two legal challenges in the Supreme of South Australia, one from winemakers Foster's Group and Parker Estate which successfully blocked the Council's push to build the road last year and a second by Penola and District Residents and Ratepayers Association which found in favour of the Council, Mr Brennan said.
The ratepayer action is now subject to an appeal.
About 20ha of Treasury Wine Estates-owned vineyards would be cut diagonally by the planned road with the impact on 20-year-old vines bearing grapes used for the company's Wynns Coonawarra Estate chardonnay and Wynns black label cabernet sauvignon wines, the spokeswoman said.
cheers,
Rhino
-
rogue
- Donating Member
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:45 am
- Location: Over here
#2
Post
by rogue » Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:11 pm
-
drwaddles
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:12 pm
- Location: EAS Bay 1
#3
Post
by drwaddles » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:30 pm
If the vines have been there for 20 years, why are they not shown on the aerial photos?!
-
rhino
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
- Location: Nairne
#4
Post
by rhino » Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:47 am
drwaddles wrote:If the vines have been there for 20 years, why are they not shown on the aerial photos?!
Directly north of the town (between the town and the left side of that photograph) you can clearly see the bypass cutting through vineyards. Just got to know what you're looking at
cheers,
Rhino
-
drwaddles
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:12 pm
- Location: EAS Bay 1
#5
Post
by drwaddles » Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:31 am
A small corner of a land parcel just before the bypass rejoins the existing road? No wonder I wouldn't have spotted it...
Doesn't look too difficult to shift the road slightly north to miss that vineyard...
-
rhino
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
- Location: Nairne
#6
Post
by rhino » Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:16 pm
From where the bypass leaves the Riddoch Highway until it crosses Weirs Lane, it is cutting through vineyards.
cheers,
Rhino
-
Westside
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 4:30 pm
#7
Post
by Westside » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:18 am
The map doesn't show what is north of the town, but surely a bypass that side would be cheaper as it would not have to cross the rail line twice (this increasing the expense with overpasses).
Just my opinion after looking at it only a few minutes.
-
drsmith
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
- Location: Perth
#8
Post
by drsmith » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:30 am
The impression I get from the map above is that the two rail crossings will be at grade.
There still must have been a compelling reason not to go to the other side of the town and avoid the rail crossings alltogether.
-
rhino
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
- Location: Nairne
#9
Post
by rhino » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:36 am
Westside wrote:The map doesn't show what is north of the town
There is a north arrow in the bottom left corner of the aerial photo. It points to the left. That's where north is.
cheers,
Rhino
-
fabricator
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:13 pm
#10
Post
by fabricator » Fri Nov 05, 2010 10:49 pm
Or they could just put Scotts Transport to sleep, and re-instate the train line to carry the freight instead of all those trucks. Would make perfect sense, unless your a bitter truck magnate.
AdelaideNow: Now with 300% more Liberal Party hacks, at no extra cost.
-
Westside
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 4:30 pm
#11
Post
by Westside » Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:37 pm
Sorry, to the East then. I didn't think new rail crossings were advised anymore - especially on important freight routes.
-
peas_and_corn
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:32 pm
#12
Post
by peas_and_corn » Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:21 pm
The wine industry has a grape glut. No big loss. Hey, if the amount of grapes grown keeps going down, maybe the growers will be able to make a profit on their grapes sometime
-
Wayno
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
- Location: Torrens Park
#13
Post
by Wayno » Mon Nov 08, 2010 8:59 am
peas_and_corn wrote:The wine industry has a grape glut. No big loss. Hey, if the amount of grapes grown keeps going down, maybe the growers will be able to make a profit on their grapes sometime
err No.
The 'glut' is an australia-wide issue (mostly caused by large companies mass producing
mediocre wine on average soil) and is no justification for permanently wiping out
terra rossa land from which the world's best wines originate. The geology of the Coonawarra district is one of 'random patches' of excellence and they must be preserved. Trouble is, i don't believe the Coonawarra district has been officially mapped from a viticultural perspective - so this bypass proposal comes as no surprise.
If alternate bypass routes exist then they must be investigated. Also seems silly to cross the rail line.
Terra Rossa (definition from wikipedia): Terra Rossa (Italian for "red soil") is a type of red clay soil produced by the weathering of limestone. When limestone weathers, the clay contained in the rocks is left behind, along with any other non-soluble rock material. Under oxidizing conditions, when the soils are above the water table, iron oxide (rust) forms in the clay. This gives it a characteristic red to orange colour. Terra rossa is typically found in regions with a Mediterranean climate. Compared to most clay soils, terra rossa has surprisingly good drainage characteristics. This makes it a popular soil type for wine production. Among other wine regions, it is found in La Mancha in Spain and Coonawarra in Australia.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-
AtD
- VIP Member
- Posts: 4581
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
#14
Post
by AtD » Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:12 am
In short: it's about quality not quantity.
-
youarehere
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:22 pm
#15
Post
by youarehere » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:36 pm
Westside wrote:The map doesn't show what is north of the town, but surely a bypass that side would be cheaper as it would not have to cross the rail line twice (this increasing the expense with overpasses).
Just my opinion after looking at it only a few minutes.
The entire South East rail network was abandoned in the mid-90s when the majority of the SA rail network was converted to standard gauge. A tourist train did run between Penola and Mount Gambier for a while but now even that has stopped. I would assume any road over the rail "corridor" would not need to incorporate a level crossing.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 41 guests