[U/C] 269 North Terrace | 119m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1825
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by SBD »

What is the value of a new design that deletes the basement, after they have dug the hole?
Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7114
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by Ben »

SBD wrote:
Sat Mar 09, 2019 12:04 am
What is the value of a new design that deletes the basement, after they have dug the hole?
The basement was in the previous building. They were just removing it.
HiTouch
Legendary Member!
Posts: 534
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by HiTouch »

Jaymz wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2019 8:57 pm
To be honest, I hope this one doesn't happen. Adelaide finally gets a new tallest (sad but true, something we will be judged by) and we get a student accom building built just metres away. For hotel guests and apartment owners facing North, they'll be looking straight at this thing.... built right on our cultural boulevard. Arguably the finest boulevard in the country.
I got shouted down for having this opinion. The counter argument was “yeah but views are a privilege, not a right waa waa waa” btw.

The building looks crap and always has looked crap. The amendments dont change its badness.
Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1530
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by Nort »

HiTouch wrote:
Sun Mar 10, 2019 5:06 pm
Jaymz wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2019 8:57 pm
To be honest, I hope this one doesn't happen. Adelaide finally gets a new tallest (sad but true, something we will be judged by) and we get a student accom building built just metres away. For hotel guests and apartment owners facing North, they'll be looking straight at this thing.... built right on our cultural boulevard. Arguably the finest boulevard in the country.
I got shouted down for having this opinion. The counter argument was “yeah but views are a privilege, not a right waa waa waa” btw.

The building looks crap and always has looked crap. The amendments dont change its badness.
No, the argument is that the Adelaidian can't block a development simply because it blocks their views. Of the building is worthwhile or not is an entirely different question.
floplo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 241
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:43 pm

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by floplo »

HiTouch wrote:
Sun Mar 10, 2019 5:06 pm
Jaymz wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2019 8:57 pm
To be honest, I hope this one doesn't happen. Adelaide finally gets a new tallest (sad but true, something we will be judged by) and we get a student accom building built just metres away. For hotel guests and apartment owners facing North, they'll be looking straight at this thing.... built right on our cultural boulevard. Arguably the finest boulevard in the country.
The building looks crap and always has looked crap. The amendments dont change its badness.
Looking at the renders, I have to say I actually like this much more than the Adelaidean. It's sleak, clean, has something of a Manhattan banking tower (a touch of 1970's retro). The Adelaidean is busy, unclear, looks like a cheap 1990s resort hotel, or more like somebody took West Franklin (which is fine for where it is) and put its two towers on top of each other, and that just looks off
And even if you want to talk about 'finest boulevard in the country", (really???), then this (or at least the render) looks like a much better clear, powerful statement than the Adelaidean does, and its perfectly fine for its location.

And even if there are some pretty bad student accommodation buildings (the Adelaidean one....), this and a couple of others are actually pretty good and provide an interesting contrast and diversity in the skyline, so why on earth should we care that this is student accommodation and not some random apartment or office building?
citywatcher
Legendary Member!
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:51 pm

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by citywatcher »



Sent from my SM-J730G using Tapatalk

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2195
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by claybro »

floplo wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2019 5:46 am
Looking at the renders, I have to say I actually like this much more than the Adelaidean. It's sleak, clean, has something of a Manhattan banking tower (a touch of 1970's retro). The Adelaidean is busy, unclear, looks like a cheap 1990s resort hotel, or more like somebody took West Franklin (which is fine for where it is) and put its two towers on top of each other, and that just looks off
And even if you want to talk about 'finest boulevard in the country", (really???), then this (or at least the render) looks like a much better clear, powerful statement than the Adelaidean does, and its perfectly fine for its location.
North Terrace is hands down the most elegant, and intact boulevard of 19th/early 20th century buildings in Australia. Adelaide is and should be very proud. I think where some posters, including myself have concerns, is that this building is just a bit...well yes, you put it correctly, 1970's office tower. Fine in another location, just not here, on this prominent corner. Have to admit though, what it replaced, was no beauty either, its just that this is big...and average.
Mpol03
Legendary Member!
Posts: 759
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by Mpol03 »

I feel there’s so much crap on North Terrace this isn’t going to take away from the strip, unless the final finishes are piss poor. We have so much worse (Dwell) very visible from North Terrace.
Most buildings west of King William are awful and really need to be looked at if we are to talk about North Terrace being a prominant boulevard.
Jaymz
Legendary Member!
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by Jaymz »

Mpol03 wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2019 7:56 pm
I feel there’s so much crap on North Terrace this isn’t going to take away from the strip, unless the final finishes are piss poor. We have so much worse (Dwell) very visible from North Terrace.
Most buildings west of King William are awful and really need to be looked at if we are to talk about North Terrace being a prominant boulevard.

Which ones are awful, in particular?
Mpol03
Legendary Member!
Posts: 759
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by Mpol03 »

Are you blind?
User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3346
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by Nathan »

The Oaks Embassy, Horizon, EDS (or whatever it's called these days) stretch opposite the Convention Centre is pretty awful, and Urbanest on Bank St is a terrible recent addition. To the east, the John Martins carpark sucks a lot of energy out (particularly due to it's woeful ground level), and the Palais apartments (shit all over, but again a complete mess at ground level and Paxton Walk fucked up as a connection through to Vaughan Pl and Rundle St).
Jaymz
Legendary Member!
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by Jaymz »

Nathan wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2019 11:10 pm
The Oaks Embassy, Horizon, EDS (or whatever it's called these days) stretch opposite the Convention Centre is pretty awful, and Urbanest on Bank St is a terrible recent addition. To the east, the John Martins carpark sucks a lot of energy out (particularly due to it's woeful ground level), and the Palais apartments (shit all over, but again a complete mess at ground level and Paxton Walk fucked up as a connection through to Vaughan Pl and Rundle St).
Ok. I like your enthusiasm.

Yep, the Urbanest is pretty bad. For me the Stamford stands out as a shocker on that side of town.
Jaymz
Legendary Member!
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by Jaymz »

The Oaks buildings don't bother me too much.
User avatar
timtam20292
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1206
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by timtam20292 »

Mpol03 wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2019 10:55 pm
Are you blind?
What’s appealing to some may not be to others.
Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2155
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[U/C] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

Post by Patrick_27 »

Jaymz wrote:
Mon Mar 11, 2019 11:15 pm
For me the Stamford stands out as a shocker on that side of town.
But at-least the Stamford is old enough that it's probably due for some kind of a makeover. Unfortunately with a lot of the aforementioned buildings, they're mostly new and won't need a re-treatment for some time. I actually find it strange that they gave 1 KWS a facelift when it was probably one of those rare examples where a building is timeless and it materials don't need to be covered up or replaced...
Post Reply