[U/C] M2 North-South Motorway

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
aceman
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:02 am
Location: Adelaide (Hallett Cove)

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5641 Post by aceman » Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:10 pm

rev wrote:
Mon Jun 27, 2022 12:23 am
Eurostar wrote:
Sun Jun 26, 2022 10:07 am
That flyover proposed at Black Forest coming from South Road to Anzac Highway should be abandoned. We should not be encouraging cars to travel to and from the City. Express buses if they are to use the tunnel, the left lane should be a HV Lane primarily for buses and trucks.

Maybe on the South Road surface road a bus route should be trialled to run between Darlington and Wingfield to give people an alternative to driving.
Yes, let's use our teleportation devices to get to/from the city.
yep, I've never understood the thought process behind "let's try and discourage people from driving their cars to the city by deliberately limiting exits which in turn limits thousands of commercial vehicles and buses from exiting resulting in a bottleneck at the next exit point" a typical case of "in order to try and solve one problem let's create five new ones instead"

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5642 Post by rev » Mon Jun 27, 2022 6:37 pm

aceman wrote:
Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:10 pm
rev wrote:
Mon Jun 27, 2022 12:23 am
Eurostar wrote:
Sun Jun 26, 2022 10:07 am
That flyover proposed at Black Forest coming from South Road to Anzac Highway should be abandoned. We should not be encouraging cars to travel to and from the City. Express buses if they are to use the tunnel, the left lane should be a HV Lane primarily for buses and trucks.

Maybe on the South Road surface road a bus route should be trialled to run between Darlington and Wingfield to give people an alternative to driving.
Yes, let's use our teleportation devices to get to/from the city.
yep, I've never understood the thought process behind "let's try and discourage people from driving their cars to the city by deliberately limiting exits which in turn limits thousands of commercial vehicles and buses from exiting resulting in a bottleneck at the next exit point" a typical case of "in order to try and solve one problem let's create five new ones instead"
Most people don't understand it, you're not alone.

The best way to discourage more personal vehicles from going into the city, is by providing better public transport options. What we need is better roads, and better public transport.
Theres no reason we should have one over the other.
If our politicians can't deliver both, then we need to change politicians.

Their idea though is just make it impossible for cars, problem solved.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5643 Post by rev » Mon Jun 27, 2022 6:38 pm

aceman wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:18 pm
Nort wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:15 am
aceman wrote:
Fri Jun 17, 2022 8:42 pm


same thing with the T2D Facebook page. nothing posted since April 7. prior to that there were updates at least weekly with some weeks having updates and facts etc every few days. I think you're right though and labor are going back to the drawing board. in my travels recently I haven't taken any notice as to whether the core sampling that's happened along various locations just off the current south road is continuing or not.
There's a lot of activity on side streets which to me looks like core sampling.
the ones I've driven past that were actively running most days seem to have packed up with no one there. unless they've moved to a new site and haven't finished clearing the previous site.
They were drilling at the end of a side street near the Henley Beach road intersection this afternoon.

aceman
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:02 am
Location: Adelaide (Hallett Cove)

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5644 Post by aceman » Mon Jun 27, 2022 7:15 pm

rev wrote:
Mon Jun 27, 2022 6:38 pm
aceman wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:18 pm
Nort wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:15 am


There's a lot of activity on side streets which to me looks like core sampling.
the ones I've driven past that were actively running most days seem to have packed up with no one there. unless they've moved to a new site and haven't finished clearing the previous site.
They were drilling at the end of a side street near the Henley Beach road intersection this afternoon.
ok, looks as if the drilling sites south of anzac highway for the southern tunnel may have finished obtaining core samples.

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2518
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: [U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5645 Post by SBD » Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:37 am

A-Town wrote:
Sun Jun 26, 2022 9:44 pm
Waewick wrote:
Sun Jun 26, 2022 7:18 pm
The fact the worst politician in the country has any influence on this development is just horrendous.

He only has himself in mind, not the state.

Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
Agree with this take. Kouts comes across as one of the more self-serving politicians. It's a shame he took control of the state's most critical infrastructure project and that it's already been delayed by at least a year since Labor took back control.

Hope I'm wrong, but it doesn't seem like a priority for them now.
He doesn’t like the elevated section proposed near the Brickworks. I wonder if he will come up with a proposal for the tunnel to continue under the Torrens, with the portals directly into the trench. Cost and time blowouts associated with that change will mean construction in his electorate can be delayed until he has retired from parliament.

User avatar
1NEEDS2POST
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:01 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5646 Post by 1NEEDS2POST » Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:58 pm

rev wrote:
Mon Jun 27, 2022 6:37 pm
aceman wrote:
Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:10 pm
rev wrote:
Mon Jun 27, 2022 12:23 am


Yes, let's use our teleportation devices to get to/from the city.
yep, I've never understood the thought process behind "let's try and discourage people from driving their cars to the city by deliberately limiting exits which in turn limits thousands of commercial vehicles and buses from exiting resulting in a bottleneck at the next exit point" a typical case of "in order to try and solve one problem let's create five new ones instead"
Most people don't understand it, you're not alone.

The best way to discourage more personal vehicles from going into the city, is by providing better public transport options. What we need is better roads, and better public transport.
Theres no reason we should have one over the other.
If our politicians can't deliver both, then we need to change politicians.

Their idea though is just make it impossible for cars, problem solved.
Little has been said about public transport integration. Bus routes to the south, near Happy Valley, could be quite fast if buses use the motorway. What we need are bus lanes along ANZAC Highway to the tunnel. Express buses to the city will be popular, but if they keep the bus routes on surface roads and stopping all the time, then public transport will go backwards.
A-Town wrote:
Sun Jun 26, 2022 9:44 pm
Waewick wrote:
Sun Jun 26, 2022 7:18 pm
The fact the worst politician in the country has any influence on this development is just horrendous.

He only has himself in mind, not the state.

Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
Agree with this take. Kouts comes across as one of the more self-serving politicians. It's a shame he took control of the state's most critical infrastructure project and that it's already been delayed by at least a year since Labor took back control.

Hope I'm wrong, but it doesn't seem like a priority for them now.
You're not wrong, he also thinks he's above the law. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-04-20/ ... ns/1656898

NYG
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 5:23 pm

[U/C] M2 North-South Motorway

#5647 Post by NYG » Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:10 pm

1NEEDS2POST wrote:
rev wrote:
Mon Jun 27, 2022 6:37 pm
aceman wrote:
Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:10 pm
You're not wrong, he also thinks he's above the law.
Certainly not condoning his driving record, but he’s far from the only one to be considered as such.

Let’s keep discussion to the Motorway rather than politics shall we?

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5648 Post by rev » Thu Jun 30, 2022 2:04 pm

1NEEDS2POST wrote:
Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:58 pm
Little has been said about public transport integration. Bus routes to the south, near Happy Valley, could be quite fast if buses use the motorway. What we need are bus lanes along ANZAC Highway to the tunnel. Express buses to the city will be popular, but if they keep the bus routes on surface roads and stopping all the time, then public transport will go backwards.
Well exactly. I keep saying the major infrastructure projects, like the NSM particularly up north the connector, should have had trains as originally intended.
We need not only investment in our roads but PT, but some people think we should de-invest in road infrastructure, and force everyone to get on a bus or imaginary trains and trams that are in no way shape or form convenient for the majority.

If we want to be a liveable city, and maintain something reminiscent of that "20 minutes to everything", then heavy investment in roads & pt is needed, not delays and bullshit political games that both Labor and Liberal play.

We all knew Labor would do what they're doing now. Sitting there pretending it's one mans decision is a little naive when the Labor government is clearly pushing an agenda based on money/costs, or better "what money"...It's an overall government decision which is tied in to their election promises and things they will do.
They need to fund other things that they think got them elected and will keep them in government, and the easiest way to do that is to pick apart the remainder of the NSM project which the Liberals put the plan for together, and blame the Liberals.

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2376
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5649 Post by claybro » Fri Jul 01, 2022 3:01 pm

rev wrote:
Thu Jun 30, 2022 2:04 pm
1NEEDS2POST wrote:
Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:58 pm
Little has been said about public transport integration. Bus routes to the south, near Happy Valley, could be quite fast if buses use the motorway. What we need are bus lanes along ANZAC Highway to the tunnel. Express buses to the city will be popular, but if they keep the bus routes on surface roads and stopping all the time, then public transport will go backwards.
Well exactly. I keep saying the major infrastructure projects, like the NSM particularly up north the connector, should have had trains as originally intended.
We need not only investment in our roads but PT, but some people think we should de-invest in road infrastructure, and force everyone to get on a bus or imaginary trains and trams that are in no way shape or form convenient for the majority.

If we want to be a liveable city, and maintain something reminiscent of that "20 minutes to everything", then heavy investment in roads & pt is needed, not delays and bullshit political games that both Labor and Liberal play.

We all knew Labor would do what they're doing now. Sitting there pretending it's one mans decision is a little naive when the Labor government is clearly pushing an agenda based on money/costs, or better "what money"...It's an overall government decision which is tied in to their election promises and things they will do.
They need to fund other things that they think got them elected and will keep them in government, and the easiest way to do that is to pick apart the remainder of the NSM project which the Liberals put the plan for together, and blame the Liberals.
Strongly agree that the constant political posturing of both sides has created the poorly utilised mess that is Adelaide transport both road and rail. And both sides have been at it for around 50 years. But why are we even discussing busses from Happy Valley clogging up the motorway and Anzac highway, when they can be routed to an interchange at Flinders train station? Are they so scared to ask people to get off a bus and on to a train-rather than sit in a bus in a traffic jam on West Terrace every morning? There is nowhere near enough use of interchanges in Adelaide leading to competing duplication of systems.

Vasco
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2018 9:02 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5650 Post by Vasco » Fri Jul 01, 2022 6:52 pm

claybro wrote:
rev wrote:
Thu Jun 30, 2022 2:04 pm
1NEEDS2POST wrote:
Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:58 pm
Little has been said about public transport integration. Bus routes to the south, near Happy Valley, could be quite fast if buses use the motorway. What we need are bus lanes along ANZAC Highway to the tunnel. Express buses to the city will be popular, but if they keep the bus routes on surface roads and stopping all the time, then public transport will go backwards.
Well exactly. I keep saying the major infrastructure projects, like the NSM particularly up north the connector, should have had trains as originally intended.
We need not only investment in our roads but PT, but some people think we should de-invest in road infrastructure, and force everyone to get on a bus or imaginary trains and trams that are in no way shape or form convenient for the majority.

If we want to be a liveable city, and maintain something reminiscent of that "20 minutes to everything", then heavy investment in roads & pt is needed, not delays and bullshit political games that both Labor and Liberal play.

We all knew Labor would do what they're doing now. Sitting there pretending it's one mans decision is a little naive when the Labor government is clearly pushing an agenda based on money/costs, or better "what money"...It's an overall government decision which is tied in to their election promises and things they will do.
They need to fund other things that they think got them elected and will keep them in government, and the easiest way to do that is to pick apart the remainder of the NSM project which the Liberals put the plan for together, and blame the Liberals.
Strongly agree that the constant political posturing of both sides has created the poorly utilised mess that is Adelaide transport both road and rail. And both sides have been at it for around 50 years. But why are we even discussing busses from Happy Valley clogging up the motorway and Anzac highway, when they can be routed to an interchange at Flinders train station? Are they so scared to ask people to get off a bus and on to a train-rather than sit in a bus in a traffic jam on West Terrace every morning? There is nowhere near enough use of interchanges in Adelaide leading to competing duplication of systems.
That assumes people want to get off in the city rather than along south/goodwood road (and yes I know the train line is somewhere in between the two).

Also the Adelaide railway station isn’t convenient for everyone / people who work in other areas of the CBD, as opposed to where the bus stops along the way.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NTRabbit
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 364
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:00 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5651 Post by NTRabbit » Sun Jul 03, 2022 7:35 am

claybro wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 3:01 pm
Strongly agree that the constant political posturing of both sides has created the poorly utilised mess that is Adelaide transport both road and rail. And both sides have been at it for around 50 years. But why are we even discussing busses from Happy Valley clogging up the motorway and Anzac highway, when they can be routed to an interchange at Flinders train station? Are they so scared to ask people to get off a bus and on to a train-rather than sit in a bus in a traffic jam on West Terrace every morning? There is nowhere near enough use of interchanges in Adelaide leading to competing duplication of systems.
The Flinders line trains don't run often enough for that to be viable, this came up in the last government's abortive horror show of a bus network "upgrade", all it does is make the trip take even longer and encourage more car use, and that's before you get to the train not making convenient stops in the South of the CBD as said above.

Eurostar
Legendary Member!
Posts: 924
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:44 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5652 Post by Eurostar » Sun Jul 03, 2022 1:46 pm

NTRabbit wrote:
Sun Jul 03, 2022 7:35 am
claybro wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 3:01 pm
Strongly agree that the constant political posturing of both sides has created the poorly utilised mess that is Adelaide transport both road and rail. And both sides have been at it for around 50 years. But why are we even discussing busses from Happy Valley clogging up the motorway and Anzac highway, when they can be routed to an interchange at Flinders train station? Are they so scared to ask people to get off a bus and on to a train-rather than sit in a bus in a traffic jam on West Terrace every morning? There is nowhere near enough use of interchanges in Adelaide leading to competing duplication of systems.
The Flinders line trains don't run often enough for that to be viable, this came up in the last government's abortive horror show of a bus network "upgrade", all it does is make the trip take even longer and encourage more car use, and that's before you get to the train not making convenient stops in the South of the CBD as said above.
In a way the main purpose of motorway is to move freight not for truck drivers to get held up and get cut off by Kath and Kim going to City or Fountain Gate. Hence why I recommend one of the lanes in each direction should be HOV lane for transit and freight vehicles.

aceman
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:02 am
Location: Adelaide (Hallett Cove)

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5653 Post by aceman » Sun Jul 03, 2022 2:54 pm

Eurostar wrote:
Sun Jul 03, 2022 1:46 pm
NTRabbit wrote:
Sun Jul 03, 2022 7:35 am
claybro wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 3:01 pm
Strongly agree that the constant political posturing of both sides has created the poorly utilised mess that is Adelaide transport both road and rail. And both sides have been at it for around 50 years. But why are we even discussing busses from Happy Valley clogging up the motorway and Anzac highway, when they can be routed to an interchange at Flinders train station? Are they so scared to ask people to get off a bus and on to a train-rather than sit in a bus in a traffic jam on West Terrace every morning? There is nowhere near enough use of interchanges in Adelaide leading to competing duplication of systems.
The Flinders line trains don't run often enough for that to be viable, this came up in the last government's abortive horror show of a bus network "upgrade", all it does is make the trip take even longer and encourage more car use, and that's before you get to the train not making convenient stops in the South of the CBD as said above.
In a way the main purpose of motorway is to move freight not for truck drivers to get held up and get cut off by Kath and Kim going to City or Fountain Gate. Hence why I recommend one of the lanes in each direction should be HOV lane for transit and freight vehicles.
where exactly does it say that the main purpose of this motorway is for freight? my understanding is the motorway is being built to benefit everyone.

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2518
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5654 Post by SBD » Mon Jul 04, 2022 9:42 am

aceman wrote:
Sun Jul 03, 2022 2:54 pm
Eurostar wrote:
Sun Jul 03, 2022 1:46 pm
NTRabbit wrote:
Sun Jul 03, 2022 7:35 am


The Flinders line trains don't run often enough for that to be viable, this came up in the last government's abortive horror show of a bus network "upgrade", all it does is make the trip take even longer and encourage more car use, and that's before you get to the train not making convenient stops in the South of the CBD as said above.
In a way the main purpose of motorway is to move freight not for truck drivers to get held up and get cut off by Kath and Kim going to City or Fountain Gate. Hence why I recommend one of the lanes in each direction should be HOV lane for transit and freight vehicles.
where exactly does it say that the main purpose of this motorway is for freight? my understanding is the motorway is being built to benefit everyone.
The business case was built on freight movement. Once it is built, the motorway will also help commuters to live further from where they work. Free-flowing traffic produces a smaller quantity of harmful emissions than stop-start driving.

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2376
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

#5655 Post by claybro » Mon Jul 04, 2022 5:37 pm

The Flinders line trains don't run often enough for that to be viable, this came up in the last government's abortive horror show of a bus network "upgrade", all it does is make the trip take even longer and encourage more car use, and that's before you get to the train not making convenient stops in the South of the CBD as said above.
[/quote]

Then make the Flinders line more frequent.-And speed the damn trains up...they are designed to travel up to 130km/h, although obviously not where there are level crossings-they could be much faster than the current timid way they are run in Adelaide. Seriously-bus to rail works well in very other mainland city. I don't know why it is such a taboo in Adelaide.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 3 guests