#VIS: Inner-City Stadium/Riverbank Precinct

Ideas and concepts of what Adelaide can be.
Message
Author
User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#211 Post by monotonehell » Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:03 pm

BenJ wrote:
Totally agree, I've moved past the WOW LET'S BUILD A STADIUM! stage and on to the Should it be built?, How can it be built?, What purpose can it be put to?, Where's the money going to come from?

That is; I have been thinking about it.
Well, you're not the only one but obviously we have come to differing conclusions. I think having a stadium by itself would be somewhat of a missed opportunity as the main priority here has to be to make the most of the riverfront. However a stadium with an entertainment/cultural precinct would appeal to more than just the footy fans and in around the rail yards it would serve to lengthen the 'cultural mecca' that is North Tce creating a true boulevard stretching kilometres and including some of this state's finest institutions. This would be a true tourist drawcard, not to mention what it would add for the locals. Why not envision it as an Adelaidean Champs-Elysées stretching from the Wine Centre, past the botanic gardens, universities, galleries, museums, libraries, etc all the way down to an entertainment precinct featuring a stunning stadium, public squares, cafes, bars etc. Open up the streetscape similar to what they have already done along Adelaide Uni and that would be special...

But I digress.

All of this is to say that we cannot lose 'the vision thing' amongst the details lest it all becomes too hard and we give up before we've even started. That so far is the story of Adelaide and frankly it's a story I'm rather sick of.
It's okay, digressions are progress ;)
"Starting with the Wine Centre..." (lol bad example)

I see your vision and agree with it.

This is the kind of thing I've had in mind...

Something going on all down the length of North Tce is a great idea. The RAH should probably come out of the East end and be replaced by a number of developments, allowing the Botanic end to be developed into something that bridges the orphaned white elephant that is the Wine Centre to the rest of the University / Zoo area. A bit of residential amongst public buildings, restaurants, cafe's and so on, to add more people to the equation might be an idea. Something to open up all the separate sections into a cohesive whole that flows from one site to the next.

Then the public buildings (art gallery, museum, library) with the public areas that have been established enhanced to again link the separate sites and provide congress between them.

The Governor's residence is a bit of a hiccup, but moving on the hopefully redesigned Festival Centre with an Adelaide analogue of Melbourne's Fed Square, the Casino and Convention centre, city sk8, and a redeveloped lower Torrens Lake recreation area with The Marge hospital replacing RAH. Again with continuous linkage through all the sections to tie them together not loads of little boundaries that demarcate.

Then turning the corner down West Tce we find the start of the mile long Sports area with the new World Class Stadium and its associated carpark, and other facilities, footbridges link over the rail line to Mile End Station for PT to the area, and continuing across the line to the existing Mile End sporting facilities to the NorthWest and West of the Cemetery. Again all linked together to provide congress between the areas.

If the future tram extension occurs it would run down North Tce, West Tce and back to Vic Square.


Something like that anyway ;)


Meanwhile back on topic: bottom line, A CBD stadium is a great idea, it needs to be multifunction to even warrant its existence, we need to hear from all the sporting bodies as to whether they'd participate otherwise it's a white elephant, the rail yard site is too small to do this thing properly so let's find a better site, and most importantly it needs to be integrated with nearby and new facilities, as well as PT, to make it work.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

ozisnowman
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#212 Post by ozisnowman » Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:13 am

If the stadium has a roof then their is no point in having it North South as
you can align it East West and fit it in over the railyards and not have any
influence by the sun glaring in the players eyes etc..... if that was the only reason
for having it North South in the first place???

I can see that people are having a different view on this based on the code
they support. The stadium most desireably would need to be multi purpose
and used by all... However the sporting public in SA should not be held to
ransom by anyone particular code, thats why im suggesting that the Federal
Government and State Government should stop spending on upgrades to
AAMI Stadium, Adelaide Oval, Hindmarsh Stadium, Santos Stadium etc
and force the parties to stop being selfish and cooperate for a multipurpose
facility.

ozisnowman
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#213 Post by ozisnowman » Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:16 am

I have been to AAMI a few times and got the impression that the
stadium is so poorly designed from a spectator view point that
it was even abismal for watching AFL football (ie if the ball wasnt
on your side of the park you couldnt see shite)...

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#214 Post by Wayno » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:06 am

i did a U.S. patent search and found this example of a convertible stadium. In particular look at figures 8 onwards...
convertible-stadium.doc
(805 KiB) Downloaded 135 times
I realize AFL & cricket grounds are much larger that soccer fields, and this stadium probably best works with dead flat surfaces (like astro-turf), but at least we can discuss the pro's and con's.

Adelaide is the "demountable grandstand" capital of australia! if anyone can make it work - we can!!
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3071
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#215 Post by rhino » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:54 am

Saying that money for a new stadium could be gained by selling the land AAMI Stadium sits on, and the land that Hindmarsh Stadium sits on, etc, causes another problem. The AFL needs a ground in Adelaide every weekend of the footy season. This means that on that day the ground cannot be used for other sports, or for a concert. I imagine it would take at least a day to convert from one sport to another or a concert, including cleaning. If you take AAMI out of the equation (sell it off), aren't you limiting other sports? If you leave AAMI in the equation - well, the SANFL gets all the takings - why would they want to play anywhere else?

Remember, Telstra Dome is the home ground (for matches) of several AFL clubs, but there is also the MCG available, and Skilled Stadium (Kardinia Park), and probably one other available if Telstra is being used for something else.
cheers,
Rhino

User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2209
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#216 Post by Cruise » Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:08 am

who owns Hindmarsh stadium? SA Government?

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#217 Post by Wayno » Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:50 am

would introducing a 3rd AFL team in Adelaide make it easier to cost justify a new stadium?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Maximus
Legendary Member!
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:05 pm
Location: The Bush Capital (Canberra)

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#218 Post by Maximus » Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:27 am

Wayno wrote:would introducing a 3rd AFL team in Adelaide make it easier to cost justify a new stadium?
Now, that's an interesting idea...!

I can't see it happening anytime soon, but it's a very interesting idea. :D
It's = it is; its = everything else.
You're = you are; your = belongs to.
Than = comparative ("bigger than"); then = next.

User avatar
Maximus
Legendary Member!
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:05 pm
Location: The Bush Capital (Canberra)

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#219 Post by Maximus » Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:33 am

BenJ wrote:Well, you're not the only one but obviously we have come to differing conclusions. I think having a stadium by itself would be somewhat of a missed opportunity as the main priority here has to be to make the most of the riverfront. However a stadium with an entertainment/cultural precinct would appeal to more than just the footy fans and in around the rail yards it would serve to lengthen the 'cultural mecca' that is North Tce creating a true boulevard stretching kilometres and including some of this state's finest institutions. This would be a true tourist drawcard, not to mention what it would add for the locals. Why not envision it as an Adelaidean Champs-Elysées stretching from the Wine Centre, past the botanic gardens, universities, galleries, museums, libraries, etc all the way down to an entertainment precinct featuring a stunning stadium, public squares, cafes, bars etc. Open up the streetscape similar to what they have already done along Adelaide Uni and that would be special...
I definitely like this vision. Continuing on from the Champs-Elysees idea, I've thought for a few years now that North Tce would be the perfect backdrop for the final stage of the Tour Down Under. If it were turned into entertaining/sporting/cultural boulevard all the way from East Tce to West, that would be sensational.
It's = it is; its = everything else.
You're = you are; your = belongs to.
Than = comparative ("bigger than"); then = next.

Brando
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 773
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#220 Post by Brando » Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:49 am

monotonehell wrote:
Brando wrote:The possibilities are endless for such prime real estate and proximity to the CBD heartland.
PPP could work really well here, with private investors taking on the bulk of the residential and commercial, while the government control the stadium hand in hand with the SANFL, SACA, ICL, A-League, Entertainment and Convention centre's.
With careful planning and management from all parties involved, there is no reason why this could not work out.
(The Convention centre's... what? I think you missed a word here.)
Totally agree, careful planning is important so we don't end up with a white elephant.
Probably didn't explain this section the best regarding Convention Centre.
I was trying to suggest larger capacity conventions and shows, ie; Motor and Bike Shows, Auto salon etc from Wayville.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#221 Post by Wayno » Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:00 pm

Maximus wrote:
Wayno wrote:would introducing a 3rd AFL team in Adelaide make it easier to cost justify a new stadium?
Now, that's an interesting idea...!
I can't see it happening anytime soon, but it's a very interesting idea. :D
North Melbourne started looking for a new home many years ago - are they still in the market for relocation? I think 1-2 other melbourne teams are suffering financially too. I'm sure Adelaide would welcome any ex-melbourne team with open arms (would certainly stick one up brumby - :lol: - call them the Adelaide Backwaters, with the team logo being a large brown Carp)

Yep, and agree the idea is 5-7 years too early, we need a bigger population before it's truly justified. This timeframe could line up well with the extra people entering the state due to the mining boom jobs...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#222 Post by Norman » Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:02 pm

Wayno wrote:would introducing a 3rd AFL team in Adelaide make it easier to cost justify a new stadium?
I think an NRL team might be more viable.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#223 Post by Wayno » Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:05 pm

Norman wrote:
Wayno wrote:would introducing a 3rd AFL team in Adelaide make it easier to cost justify a new stadium?
I think an NRL team might be more viable.
From what perspective?
* Stadium size similar to soccer field - yes agree this makes sense
* Ability to draw large ongoing crowds - not for the foreseeable future
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#224 Post by Shuz » Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:18 pm

Before we jump into discussing (or as we already have) the need for a multipurpose stadium, I think we need to look at the tenants who would be using it, and how they interfere with one another so to justify who would be mos suited to using the facility.

Now, Adelaide Oval is a perfectly good venue for cricket matches, so cricket is out of the question.

A large majority of people are tired of AAMI Stadium for a number of reasons - poor facilities, bad accessibility and its location. Now whilst the SANFL may argue that its 'perfectly usable' they are talking from a business viewpoint (money) rather than its spectators concerns. Seeing as a multipurpose stadium is for all Adelaidians, our needs are put first. So AFL would be played, which takes place during late March - to late August. For this duration, the stadium would be used weekly, one match a week (Port or Adelaide playing) on either a Friday or Saturday or Sunday. The preseason fixture takes place from Feb-March, as do the finals, which is a variable factor, depending on how well the teams play to secure home finals games.

The A-League has already expressed interest in a new facility to host Adelaide United matches, and the season operates from late August to late Janurary, with finals played in Feburary. Over this period (generally) it would be used once a fortnight. This partially clashes (but again depending on the performance and success of our teams) with the AFL finals and pre-season fixtures. But the actual A-League and AFL seasons are at separate times from the other, which is no problem.

As for other entertainment purposes, concerts as such, are traditionally held in the summer, can be used in the off-week when Adelaide United does not play soccer at home. Seeing as they do not require a rectangular or ovular venue form, they are flexible to be held in the winter also, the day following or before a football match. Telstra Dome already operates in this matter, with two successive operations used after another.

As said, the stadium is entirely capable of being operated all-year round, minus the A-League and AFL clash in their 'finals' seasons, which I would ultimately propose that SACA in this case compromise for the use of Adelaide Oval as a backup venue for a maximum of 4 occasions if needed.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3071
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: #Vision: New Inner-City Stadium

#225 Post by rhino » Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:34 pm

Wayno wrote: North Melbourne started looking for a new home many years ago - are they still in the market for relocation?
No. They have decided to stay in Melbourne for at least one more year, and even to change their name back to North Melbourne from the Kangaroos. (Yes, they were always the Kangaroos, but in an effort to make other cities welcome them as a home team in the last few years, they dropped the "North Melbourne". It didn't work - no-one really wanted them on the terms they were offering).
cheers,
Rhino

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 0 guests