:')

[Shuz] wrote:SEAFRD?
of course it's an abbreviation - but why is it needed? What exactly is 7 characters too many for?mattblack wrote:[Shuz] wrote:SEAFRD?
Uummmmm .......... that's an abbreviation Shuz in keeping with the rest of the train timetables. Max 6 characters.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.
I suspect that is the character limit they decided upon for all their timetables, website headers and so on. Consistency is important for us OCD (CDO) types.Aidan wrote:of course it's an abbreviation - but why is it needed? What exactly is 7 characters too many for?mattblack wrote:Uummmmm .......... that's an abbreviation Shuz in keeping with the rest of the train timetables. Max 6 characters.[Shuz] wrote:SEAFRD?
You mean AR (@nally Retentive) types, surely?monotonehell wrote: I suspect that is the character limit they decided upon for all their timetables, website headers and so on. Consistency is important for us OCD (CDO) types.
No that would mean no change at allrubberman wrote:You mean AR (@nally Retentive) types, surely?monotonehell wrote: I suspect that is the character limit they decided upon for all their timetables, website headers and so on. Consistency is important for us OCD (CDO) types.![]()
On the 3000's the engine revs are controlled by the generator/traction equipment. Sometimes it screws up and revs the engine up and down over and over, usually the engine stalls at some point.jk1237 wrote:OK, I have a few days off so I went down to Seaford on the train. I didn't happen to get a new train, but oh well. The all stops was a bit excrutiating, especially because the 3000 trains are so slow in accelerating from stations, and the 2 car train almost struggled to get up the hills through Seacliff and Marino (infact it sounded like one of engines karked it, caus it was revving out of control).
All brand new track has speed restrictions, it needs a second tamping to even things out it needed. The government owned tamper is only really suited to timber and steel sleepers, which are mostly gone.jk1237 wrote:Amazingly, its been running 4 days and the quite large new carpark at Seaford was 95% full already, was quite surprised, next week when uni goes back it will probably be overflowing. The amount of temporary speed restrictions on brand new track is just torture, but its just so tradition for us. 15 min frequency is good, will be better when Tonsley opens so that Seaford trains can be express from city to Woodlands park
Oaklands can only do 5 cars which is a problem although not insurmountable.AG wrote:So apparently the express services are being instated for the Seaford Line from April on a Seaford-Seaford Meadows-Noarlunga-Adelaide basis.
I wonder if any 6-car trains will eventually be run.
Nice foresight, but I don't think there'll ever be a need to run them as twelve car trains.muzzamo wrote:I was speaking to a train driver mate of mine who told me they have actually tested with twelve (!) cars.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 2 guests