[U/C] Burnside Village (Extension)

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Post Reply
Message
Author
source of info
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 10:18 pm

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#76 Post by source of info » Tue Apr 26, 2011 10:38 pm

have heard those 2 are definate as well as Zara's first store. Overheard 2 men in their the other day at Cibo talking about retailers etc, they were mentioning brands such as Sass & Bide, Calibre, Allanah Hill, G Star in their conversations but did not here completely what they were talking about. Surely a list of tenants will be released shortly, not long to go. Hope BBDO Clemenger pull out their big guns for this project, theyre going to need to get people attention to pay for the construction.

cruel_world00
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:54 am

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#77 Post by cruel_world00 » Wed Apr 27, 2011 3:12 pm

source of info wrote:have heard those 2 are definate as well as Zara's first store.

If by "Zara's first store" you are referring to in Adelaide, then yes, that is possible. But if you were talking about Australia, I'm pretty sure they just opened a store in Melbourne.

source of info
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 10:18 pm

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#78 Post by source of info » Wed Apr 27, 2011 3:43 pm

sorry, ye meant in Adelaide. They opened in Sydney last week and opening in Melbourne in June.

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#79 Post by metro » Wed Apr 27, 2011 4:13 pm

Still pretty good for Adelaide though, being one of the first cities to get the first Zara stores in Australia, usually Adelaide is the last place stores open up in :?

local
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:26 am

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#80 Post by local » Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:09 am

Any word on cuisine? I thought I saw somewhere there was going to be restaurants there, doesn't look big enough for that.

flavze
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 11:38 am

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#81 Post by flavze » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:29 pm

bit worries bout this, the missus eyes lit up when i mentioned some of the possible new brands!

pushbutton
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1451
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:01 pm
Location: Adelaide

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#82 Post by pushbutton » Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:36 pm

I've never understood all the fuss about "brands". Surely one handbag is the same as another whether it costs $20 or $200, so why waste money?

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7502
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#83 Post by Ben » Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:38 pm

pushbutton wrote:I've never understood all the fuss about "brands". Surely one handbag is the same as another whether it costs $20 or $200, so why waste money?
Um are you serious??? Quality, design, status etc

User avatar
Splashmo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 373
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Adelaide

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#84 Post by Splashmo » Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:35 pm

Ben wrote:
pushbutton wrote:I've never understood all the fuss about "brands". Surely one handbag is the same as another whether it costs $20 or $200, so why waste money?
Um are you serious??? Quality, design, status etc
I think pushbutton was expressing his opinion that a $20 handbag probably does the same job as a $200 handbag, so why spend the extra money purely for the label (although this is a man talking here).

I know people make a lot of fuss over Louis Vuitton and Prada and whatnot, but they are seriously everywhere overseas and increasingly interstate. They all sell the same thing. There may be 10 or 20 of the same store alone in Tokyo and other major cities. What's the appeal?

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#85 Post by metro » Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:22 pm

^^ the $200-$2,000 product is "made with love" and probably in Italy or France with only the finest materials and are designed to last a lifetime..

The $20 product is made by slave labor in a sweatshop, with the cheapest materials and are only designed to last a short time..

:cheers:

iTouch
Legendary Member!
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:37 pm

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#86 Post by iTouch » Sun May 01, 2011 2:32 am

well I buy my shoes from Target for $8 and people are all like "dude!! Sweet kicks! Where'd you get them?"

just my :2cents:
Don't burn the Adelaide Parkland (preservation society)

User avatar
fishinajar
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 12:23 pm
Location: Adelaide

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#87 Post by fishinajar » Sun May 01, 2011 7:48 am

pushbutton wrote:I've never understood all the fuss about "brands". Surely one handbag is the same as another whether it costs $20 or $200, so why waste money?
For starters the brands we're talking are not $200 hand bag brands, but pushing closer to the $2000 mark which significantly changes the question. Lets use iTouch's example of the $8 Target shoes. Ignoring the fact that iTouch thinks his/her friends is complementing their latest purchase of "sweet kicks", the shoes will most likely be made of poor quality synthetics constructed in developing countries in poor conditions by underpaid child workers and will probably fall apart upon thinking of putting them on, besides making your feet feel and smell bad. A $200 pair of shoes will most likely be mad of reasonable quality leather constructed in developing countries in poor conditions by underpaid child workers supervised to make sure their doing a good job and with a quality checking processes to ensure you new kicks look good, feel comfortable and last the extra mile. Why spend $1800 more? No reason really other than if your asking the question, you have your answer.
iTouch: kudos on the honesty and no hard feelings, I have fond memories of kt26s though got tired of replacing them monthly.

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#88 Post by Omicron » Sun May 01, 2011 9:22 pm

pushbutton wrote:I've never understood all the fuss about "brands". Surely one handbag is the same as another whether it costs $20 or $200, so why waste money?
Go find the nearest female and have her slap you with her $200 handbag. :wink:

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3216
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#89 Post by [Shuz] » Mon May 02, 2011 8:58 am

I think what he was trying to say, that there's really no difference between a handbag's purpose, whether it be #20, $200, or $2000.

It still holds all the trash girls lug around with them. Whatever keeps them happy, I suppose.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[U/C] Re: #U/C: Burnside Village Redevelopment - $100 million

#90 Post by Will » Tue May 03, 2011 12:26 pm

Apologies if this has been posted before:


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests