[COM] 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Ibis Hotel

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Post Reply
Message
Author
rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6655
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#91 Post by rev » Sun Nov 20, 2011 7:22 am

How many of you are regulars at the Jade?

User avatar
Zills
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:59 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#92 Post by Zills » Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:13 pm

The Jade's a great little spot imo, but it's definately not a conductive music venue for anything with guitar ampifiers.. The room is too small, the sound bounces all over the place creating standing waves - in english, it sounds like crap.. even though I've had a lot of great nights there, I would rather see this place on the chopping block over jive, fowlers, or the gov. :)

Envirosociocapital
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:37 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#93 Post by Envirosociocapital » Tue Dec 06, 2011 2:03 pm

Sorry, but some of the comments here are downright offensive to anyone who makes part or all of a what is usually a meagre income out of trying to play live original music in Adelaide. Small music venues in old buildings, run by creative entrepreneurs are at the absolute centre of what makes a city vibrant. Without the independent, unique venues with a history behind them (no matter how short), the world's vibrant and exciting cities (Berlin, London, Melbourne, Sydney, Paris, New York, Fremantle) would be soul-less, cultureless working hubs. Let's not forget that the once grand Tivoli was where bands like Midnight Oil, Cold Chisel and the Skyhooks once played and is now an ode to the popped-collar shirt and pokie addiction. I agree the Jade is one of the less band-appropriate gig venues in Adelaide, but seriously, why can't we co-exist and have a new hotel next to a live-music venue? build next to it, around it, over it or under it (and noise-proof appropriately), but don't get rid of it . . . When are Adelaideans going to learn that new, shiny, precast, flatpack CBD restaurants, offices and hotels in the place of grungy, fun, live-original-music-supporting venues, will only continue to exacerbate the tide of young creatives moving east?

Maybe for a short time there are still a few old buildings in the CBD into which the Jade could move (if liquor licensing and ACC development regs/noise guidelines weren't so restrictive). However, the stage is rapidly approaching where there will be only a handful of venues in town that can provide gigs to new, original music acts, who need all the opportunities they can get to develop their stagecraft. Waewick, if you've ever been to a musical performance and enjoyed it, you can guarantee that the performers benefitted immensely at one stage of their careers, from the existence of venues like the Jade. There are not many left in Adelaide. This is a classic case of short-term gain being used in a overly weighted sense against wider aspirations and ideals for our city.

Why not let the development proceed on the grenfell st frontage but require that the Jade remain? Why does approval of the developer's plans attract an all or nothing attitude? Are we scared of offending shareholders in another country somewhere by asking that a concept plan be changed slightly? I don't see this as an either-or argument....there are always shades of grey, and there is always a creative solution that hasn't yet been thought of.

Just build it
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:12 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#94 Post by Just build it » Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:57 pm

I still don't get who the club's supporters are actually angry with. The ACC? The DAC? I'm guessing it's the (probably very happy) ex-owner of the property who sold it to the developer? Or the developer? It seems straightforward why a developer would buy a small neighbouring property so he doesn't have to spend a small fortune on extra soundproofing to reduce the noise from it's part time music venue late at night. A venue that could very well choose to close it's doors or relocate at the next opportunity anyway.

I'm neutral towards the club itself and have absolutely nothing at all against it's patrons but seriously, for every one person who will pack up and move to Melbourne because of the loss of the JM I'm sure they'll be two (or ten) people directly or indirectly employed by the hotel who won't mind a bit. If the loss of one venue (and possibly only in it's current location) is enough for someone to jump ship to Melbourne then just go already and stop crying wolf, go see if the grass really is greener. For all those bands and fans who have a backbone and love the way the club operates then why not organize some mass support for the Jade's current 'creative entrepreneurs', do what you can to assist finding them another equally grungy space to rent in the CBD and get on with it. That's what being young and 'indi' is all about.

User avatar
omada
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Eden Hills

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#95 Post by omada » Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:23 am

oh yeah Adelaide desperately needs another concrete and glass hotel.. we are crying out for it, they are so attractive and add sooo much to our skyline and the street level activation from such a hotel is just mindblowing. not!

The current building should be heritage listed, full stop.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3818
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#96 Post by Waewick » Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:35 am

lets just heritage list the whole CBD and be done with it

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#97 Post by [Shuz] » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:02 am

omada wrote:oh yeah Adelaide desperately needs another concrete and glass hotel.. we are crying out for it, they are so attractive and add sooo much to our skyline and the street level activation from such a hotel is just mindblowing. not!

The current building should be heritage listed, full stop.
That building with the costume shop in it?
Surely you jest.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Allkai
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 346
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:59 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#98 Post by Allkai » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:03 am

LOL, beat me to it Shuz.

insert notsureifsrs.jpg

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5909
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#99 Post by Will » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:49 am

Although I think the Jade Monkey is vital to the live music scene, I have come to the realisation that the Jade Monkey is not a building but a club. Just like Tuxedo Cat, there is nothing stopping the Jade Monkey moving to another equally appropriate space within the CBD.

What we should be campaigning for instead is for the ACC to relax their restrictive liquor and noise policies.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#100 Post by [Shuz] » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:40 am

Will wrote: What we should be campaigning for instead is for the ACC to relax their restrictive liquor and noise policies.
Hear, hear.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#101 Post by Wayno » Wed Dec 07, 2011 12:29 pm

Just build it wrote:It seems straightforward why a developer would buy a small neighbouring property
The developer bought as one property. The land is 'L shaped' with 2 street frontages.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
omada
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Eden Hills

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#102 Post by omada » Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:05 pm

waewick: lets just heritage list the whole CBD and be done with it
Excellent idea waewick!

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3727
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#103 Post by SRW » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:40 pm

I don't understand why most people are seeing this as an either/or proposition. It's not either build the hotel, or keep the Jade. The hotel doesn't need the Jade to go in order to be built -- it's not building on the Jade! The thing that should outrage us all is that the developer is, as far as we can tell, proposing to demolish the Jade just for the sake of it! That leaves us all the poorer, and it shouldn't be accepted.
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
Pants
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1293
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Back Home

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#104 Post by Pants » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:49 am

Could it be that the land the Jade is on will be used for access/crane-basing in order for the hotel to go up quickly and cheaply enough for its construction to be commercially viable?

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

[COM] Re: PRO: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17 Levels | Hotel

#105 Post by AtD » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:41 am

If I had to guess, I'd say it's because hotel guests wouldn't like having a live music venue right next door.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Capbld, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 3 guests