News & Discussion: Infrastructure Australia

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
Will409
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 am
Location: Parafield Gardens

News & Discussion: Infrastructure Australia

#1 Post by Will409 » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:19 pm

At the present time, the Federal Government is calling for public submissions in the $20billion "Building Australia" fund which is designated for infrastructure projects including rail. Since we already know the details of from the SA Government report on the Noarlunga Centre - Seaford railway extension and there is already talk of the Federal Government putting money in, how about we assemble our own submission? I have already posted this subject on RailSA to see if we can get some help from there.

Details are here:

http://www.minister.infrastructure.gov. ... 1_2008.htm
Submissions should be no more than 15 pages and sent to [email protected] with "Submission" in the subject field.

Although email is preferred, submissions may be lodged via post and should be addressed to:

The Infrastructure Coordinator
Infrastructure Australia
GPO Box 594
CANBERRA 2601
Guidelines for submissions are here:

http://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov. ... sions.aspx
Last edited by Will409 on Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE.

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#2 Post by Omicron » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:33 pm

Even in my old age I still get propositioned? Bless your heart.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#3 Post by Wayno » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:41 pm

will409, it can't hurt to compile a submission. I plead complete ignorance about PT related issues, but will happily review the document for readability, etc...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Will409
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 am
Location: Parafield Gardens

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#4 Post by Will409 » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:49 pm

Don't worry Wayno, as my edited opening post says, I have also posted this topic on RailSA so we may be able to get some help from there. Since the land has already been bought from Noarlunga Centre to Seaford and the current State Budget providing funding for a land corridor from Seaford to Aldinga, I personally think this should be looked into. I'll see if I can dig up the Noarlunga Centre - Seaford railway report and we can probably use that for some background information.
Image LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE.

Somebody
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 6:06 pm
Location: Australia (East Coast)

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#5 Post by Somebody » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:16 pm

What happens if Wilfy writes part of it?

"Passenger trains to X, trains to Y, buses to nowhere, a train here, a train there"

....
The Gold Coast - Australia's centre for insipid, tacky & boring.

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#6 Post by Shuz » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:42 pm

I think the demand for a north-south freeway corridor is much greater than rail investment at this moment in time - the Feds have always been significantly pro-road and will be more likely to throw whatever money around that fuels frieght truck movements as a way of 'economical investment'. I wouldn't be hoping too much for Federal funds into either extension.

User avatar
joshzxzx
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:17 pm

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#7 Post by joshzxzx » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:57 pm

I agree with Shuz, I believe that the money should be poured into South Road to make it a 80-100 freeway.. This would enable freight and many other forms of transport to move the entire way across Adelaide in an efficient manner.
South Australia the Festival State

User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2209
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#8 Post by Cruise » Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:04 pm

Not sure what all may you may think of this but do you maybe think making south road a limited access road may woresen traffic on surrounding roads?

Pat28
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 4:42 pm

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#9 Post by Pat28 » Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:08 pm

Ive got the report for Noarlunga Centre to Seaford, where it harps on about the Westerly alignment and the 1980's alignment for the railway, who wants it?
Besser Verkehr in den Bergen

User avatar
Will409
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 am
Location: Parafield Gardens

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#10 Post by Will409 » Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:13 pm

I'll have it (or atleast borrow it).
Image LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE.

Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2135
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Location: Christies Beach

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#11 Post by Aidan » Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:47 pm

Pat28 wrote:Ive got the report for Noarlunga Centre to Seaford, where it harps on about the Westerly alignment and the 1980's alignment for the railway, who wants it?
If you're referring to the October 2007 report, one thing to note is that the Westerly alignment plan has improved since it was written: see http://www.onkaparingacity.com:80/web/b ... typen=html for the newer plan. Compared to the DTEI alignment, it's longer, but significantly cheaper, and serves Seaford Meadows much better, so that the suburb would not require a bus route as it would for the DTEI alignment.

Both alignments are ridiculously overspecced, with gradients and clearances designed for double stacked freight trains rather than the trains that would actually be using that line.

User avatar
Will409
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 am
Location: Parafield Gardens

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#12 Post by Will409 » Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:06 pm

For 25000 kV 50Hz AC electric traction like what we are getting, the average height of the contact wire (in Queensland atleast) is 1m above the roof of the rollingstock. That is only the contact wire, the additional wiring and caternary structures stand even higher so a fair amount of above head clearance is needed. The width of the alignment generally also needs to be wider to take the caternary masts also. Finally, it does help having and alignment with light gradients and curve radius to allow for higher speeds. Sometimes it is better to over engineer things.
Image LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6422
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#13 Post by Norman » Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:28 pm

When are submissions due by?

User avatar
Will409
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 am
Location: Parafield Gardens

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#14 Post by Will409 » Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:47 pm

October 15.
Image LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6422
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: A Sensational-Adelaide proposition

#15 Post by Norman » Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:11 pm

Will409 wrote:October 15.
Unfortunately I won't have much/any time to contribute :(

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests