[COM] Festival Plaza Tower 1 | 115m | 27 Levels | Office

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[COM] Re: [U/C] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1411 Post by ChillyPhilly » Wed Feb 02, 2022 6:55 pm


AndyWelsh wrote:Update from today of the area around the plaza:

Image

Image
Damn, I was really hoping there would be a higher density of planted trees.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5799
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1412 Post by Will » Wed Feb 02, 2022 7:17 pm

VinyTapestry849 wrote:
Wed Feb 02, 2022 3:02 pm
Update published, tell me if there's any improvements you think are needed?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_t ... _buildings
Great work!

Only some slight adjustments required to the data regarding building heights. 115 King William Street is 92m and the Intercontinental is 87m. The new BHP building is 85m.

Jaymz
Legendary Member!
Posts: 976
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1413 Post by Jaymz » Wed Feb 02, 2022 7:22 pm

Thanks for all the photos ppl.

Actually I think it's looking pretty good, it's taken a long time to get to this point. Agree that more shade is needed but I think with some patience that will be sorted.

VinyTapestry849
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1414 Post by VinyTapestry849 » Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:44 pm

Will wrote:
Wed Feb 02, 2022 7:17 pm
VinyTapestry849 wrote:
Wed Feb 02, 2022 3:02 pm
Update published, tell me if there's any improvements you think are needed?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_t ... _buildings
Great work!

Only some slight adjustments required to the data regarding building heights. 115 King William Street is 92m and the Intercontinental is 87m. The new BHP building is 85m.
Cheers, I'll fix that in the morning. Thanks for the heads up! :cheers:

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2170
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[COM] Re: [U/C] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1415 Post by Nort » Wed Feb 02, 2022 10:36 pm

ChillyPhilly wrote:
Wed Feb 02, 2022 6:55 pm
AndyWelsh wrote:Update from today of the area around the plaza:

Image

Image
Damn, I was really hoping there would be a higher density of planted trees.
Looks like Jacarandas, they can get quite big.

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2378
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1416 Post by claybro » Wed Feb 02, 2022 10:52 pm

The Jacarandas do grow to be large trees, within a decade. The tree choice should come as no surprise as all the early renders of this site Cleary showed purple flowering Jacaranda trees. They look beautiful in spring and are a real feature in some Adelaide suburbs.

User avatar
baytram366
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm
Contact:

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1417 Post by baytram366 » Thu Feb 03, 2022 8:49 am

Are a lot of the original art works from when the festival centre plaza was built going to be re-instated?
Baytram 366's Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/34520752@N07/collections

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2170
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1418 Post by Nort » Thu Feb 03, 2022 11:14 am

claybro wrote:
Wed Feb 02, 2022 10:52 pm
The Jacarandas do grow to be large trees, within a decade. The tree choice should come as no surprise as all the early renders of this site Cleary showed purple flowering Jacaranda trees. They look beautiful in spring and are a real feature in some Adelaide suburbs.
Oh yeah, Jacarandas look great. That lawn does look like it will be a massive pain in the butt to mow though.
baytram366 wrote:
Thu Feb 03, 2022 8:49 am
Are a lot of the original art works from when the festival centre plaza was built going to be re-instated?
Nope, they were mostly destroyed in the process of being removed I believe.

CB2021
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2021 10:35 pm

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1419 Post by CB2021 » Thu Feb 03, 2022 6:38 pm

Im just a bit concerned that there isn't any permanent tv screen installation,what's going to attract people to the plaza ,even the water feature is more of a shallow water feature it doesn't even have water jets from what I've seen being tested last weekend,water fountains are a big draw card for kids and parents i.e Mosely square ...just my thoughts anyway .🤔

User avatar
Spotto
Legendary Member!
Posts: 694
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1420 Post by Spotto » Thu Feb 03, 2022 9:38 pm

CB2021 wrote:
Thu Feb 03, 2022 6:38 pm
even the water feature is more of a shallow water feature it doesn't even have water jets from what I've seen being tested last weekend,water fountains are a big draw card for kids and parents i.e Mosely square ...just my thoughts anyway .🤔
They probably don't want kids playing in the water features in the city.

bits
Legendary Member!
Posts: 820
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:24 pm

[COM] Re: [U/C] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1421 Post by bits » Fri Feb 04, 2022 1:48 am


Spotto wrote:
They probably don't want kids playing in the water features in the city.
Why?
They seem welcome in the Victoria Square water feature.

User avatar
Spotto
Legendary Member!
Posts: 694
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm

[COM] Re: [U/C] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1422 Post by Spotto » Fri Feb 04, 2022 1:46 pm

bits wrote:
Fri Feb 04, 2022 1:48 am
Spotto wrote:
They probably don't want kids playing in the water features in the city.
Why?
They seem welcome in the Victoria Square water feature.
At a guess, they might not want it happening in front of the state’s main entertainment venue for “looks”. Victoria Square is more of a public place and away from anything “important” so they might have less of a problem with it there.

Prodical
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 489
Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 5:10 pm

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1423 Post by Prodical » Sat Feb 12, 2022 3:25 pm

This is a fast moving building site

Apologies for the poor quality of the late afternoon photos
Attachments
2.jpg
1.jpg

ghs
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:09 am
Location: Brighton

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1424 Post by ghs » Sat Feb 12, 2022 4:39 pm

Jaymz wrote:
Wed Feb 02, 2022 7:22 pm
Thanks for all the photos ppl.

Actually I think it's looking pretty good, it's taken a long time to get to this point. Agree that more shade is needed but I think with some patience that will be sorted.
Brother, if they have more shade then how the hell is the grass going to grow lol ?

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3211
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Redevelopment | $800 million

#1425 Post by [Shuz] » Sat Feb 12, 2022 4:40 pm

You clearly don't know how the rotation of the earth, or its rotation around the sun works.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Algernon, Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 75 guests