[U/C] Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6391
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#211 Post by Norman » Mon Jun 20, 2022 1:30 pm

I did a drive-through video on Saturday morning when the bridge first opened.

You can watch it here: https://youtu.be/hRqvIp3cL5k

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#212 Post by rev » Mon Jun 20, 2022 8:43 pm

Drove through the other morning, its steeper then I thought it would be based on the renders.

Much needed and about time.
Now if only they got on with a major level crossing removal project across the network.

Cryptic
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 2:28 am

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#213 Post by Cryptic » Mon Jun 20, 2022 9:45 pm

Interestingly, the 2022-23 state budget included

"10 year level crossing removal planning program

$10 million over two years"

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2518
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#214 Post by SBD » Mon Jun 20, 2022 11:02 pm

Cryptic wrote:
Mon Jun 20, 2022 9:45 pm
Interestingly, the 2022-23 state budget included

"10 year level crossing removal planning program

$10 million over two years"
So by the 2026 election, they will have a "plan" to remove the level crossings in ten years. In 2015 they had a plan to build the North South Corridor in ten years, too, but now it won't be finished until at least 2030. $10M is not going to build many new bridges (especially if they want to buy land nearby), so it's only for the plan.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#215 Post by rev » Tue Jun 21, 2022 5:58 am

Cryptic wrote:
Mon Jun 20, 2022 9:45 pm
Interestingly, the 2022-23 state budget included

"10 year level crossing removal planning program

$10 million over two years"
$10 million?
So, more "studies"..

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6391
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#216 Post by Norman » Tue Jun 21, 2022 8:13 am

rev wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 5:58 am
Cryptic wrote:
Mon Jun 20, 2022 9:45 pm
Interestingly, the 2022-23 state budget included

"10 year level crossing removal planning program

$10 million over two years"
$10 million?
So, more "studies"..
Not necessarily just studies, it could also include preliminary designs and business case development to get federal funding and assessment through Infrastructure Australia.

User avatar
Spotto
Legendary Member!
Posts: 690
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#217 Post by Spotto » Tue Jun 21, 2022 8:57 am

SBD wrote: So by the 2026 election, they will have a "plan" to remove the level crossings in ten years. In 2015 they had a plan to build the North South Corridor in ten years, too, but now it won't be finished until at least 2030.
If there had been a cohesive plan for the entirety of the North-South Corridor instead of tackling each section bit-by-bit as isolated projects, it might well be nearing completion by now.

We need our own version of Perth’s Metronet to tackle ALL future public transport developments as part of a grand vision.

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2153
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#218 Post by Nort » Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:18 am

Norman wrote:
Mon Jun 20, 2022 1:30 pm
I did a drive-through video on Saturday morning when the bridge first opened.

You can watch it here: https://youtu.be/hRqvIp3cL5k
Are those traffic lights on the western side of the overpass going to be there when it's finished? Seems potentially dangerous since traffic will be backed up with traffic coming up the Eastern side not being able to see it.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6391
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#219 Post by Norman » Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:40 am

Nort wrote:
Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:18 am
Norman wrote:
Mon Jun 20, 2022 1:30 pm
I did a drive-through video on Saturday morning when the bridge first opened.

You can watch it here: https://youtu.be/hRqvIp3cL5k
Are those traffic lights on the western side of the overpass going to be there when it's finished? Seems potentially dangerous since traffic will be backed up with traffic coming up the Eastern side not being able to see it.
Yes, they will be there on a permanent basis, hopefully once all the barriers are packed up the sight lines will be better.

User avatar
Pistol
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Adelaide

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#220 Post by Pistol » Tue Jun 21, 2022 12:21 pm

I still think they missed a big opportunity to remove those lights and have traffic turning onto Churchill Road grade separated from Torrens Road.
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#221 Post by rev » Fri Jul 08, 2022 3:08 pm

Having driven over this bridge now many times, I'm going to predict there's going to be some issues particularly heading west over it towards Chief Street.
Hopefully it's just the current alignment while they finish it off but I dare say there's going to be a few bingles at the bottom near the Chief Street intersection.

Eurostar
Legendary Member!
Posts: 924
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:44 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#222 Post by Eurostar » Sat Jul 09, 2022 11:32 am

Ideally if South Australia Government had rivers of money the railway line should be in tunnel between North Adelaide and Islington. Shops/Apartments built above a new Ovingham Railway Station. Tramline to Kilkenny via Torrens Road. Nearby bury the ring road, people could then have direct access to Adelaide Parklands without needing to cross busy roads.

User avatar
1NEEDS2POST
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:01 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#223 Post by 1NEEDS2POST » Sun Jul 10, 2022 12:42 am

Eurostar wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 11:32 am
Ideally if South Australia Government had rivers of money the railway line should be in tunnel between North Adelaide and Islington. Shops/Apartments built above a new Ovingham Railway Station. Tramline to Kilkenny via Torrens Road. Nearby bury the ring road, people could then have direct access to Adelaide Parklands without needing to cross busy roads.
Some of the ring road intersections should be grade separated too. Jeffcott Rd-Torrens Rd is a good candidate because of the terrain. While we're at it, some of the roads going through the parklands should go underground. Rundle Rd should be underground and then we can expand Rymill Park over the top.

Eurostar
Legendary Member!
Posts: 924
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:44 pm

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#224 Post by Eurostar » Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:26 am

1NEEDS2POST wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 12:42 am
Eurostar wrote:
Sat Jul 09, 2022 11:32 am
Ideally if South Australia Government had rivers of money the railway line should be in tunnel between North Adelaide and Islington. Shops/Apartments built above a new Ovingham Railway Station. Tramline to Kilkenny via Torrens Road. Nearby bury the ring road, people could then have direct access to Adelaide Parklands without needing to cross busy roads.
Some of the ring road intersections should be grade separated too. Jeffcott Rd-Torrens Rd is a good candidate because of the terrain. While we're at it, some of the roads going through the parklands should go underground. Rundle Rd should be underground and then we can expand Rymill Park over the top.
All well and good but I'd shrink Rundle Road to one lane in each direction (buses only in busy periods)

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3766
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

[U/C] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

#225 Post by Nathan » Sun Jul 10, 2022 1:43 pm

1NEEDS2POST wrote:
Sun Jul 10, 2022 12:42 am
While we're at it, some of the roads going through the parklands should go underground. Rundle Rd should be underground and then we can expand Rymill Park over the top.
We'd could have got close to that with the original O-Bahn tunnel plan (but with Rundle Rd aligned to Grenfell St), but the Parklands Association had to cut their nose off.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: abc and 18 guests