New City Arena

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
Spotto
Legendary Member!
Posts: 694
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm

Re: New City Arena

#286 Post by Spotto » Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:09 pm

rev wrote:
Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:53 pm
Nee stadium for Tassie if the AFL grants them an AFL license.
27,000 capacity.
AFL sized stadium, obviously.
What are they proposing here for nearly $700 million that's for sports that use playing areas not even half an AFL oval? Gold plated toilets?
Either Marshall has severely overestimated the cost of his stadium, or Gutwein has severely underestimated the cost of his stadium.

Or more likely, both have severely underestimated the cost to different degrees.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3620
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: New City Arena

#287 Post by Waewick » Thu Mar 03, 2022 10:13 pm

rev wrote:
FB_IMG_1646306258547.jpg
Nee stadium for Tassie if the AFL grants them an AFL license.
27,000 capacity.
AFL sized stadium, obviously.
What are they proposing here for nearly $700 million that's for sports that use playing areas not even half an AFL oval? Gold plated toilets?
No roof ? (Thats a guess )

Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk


VinyTapestry849
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm

Re: New City Arena

#288 Post by VinyTapestry849 » Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:49 am

rev wrote:
Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:53 pm
FB_IMG_1646306258547.jpg

Nee stadium for Tassie if the AFL grants them an AFL license.
27,000 capacity.
AFL sized stadium, obviously.
What are they proposing here for nearly $700 million that's for sports that use playing areas not even half an AFL oval? Gold plated toilets?
Tassie's new stadium will be barely economically viable. Adelaide oval cost $450m (nearly half of what is being proposed) and its the most praised venue in the country. So what is $700m going to get you, robot staff & cushioned seats? If it's got a retractable roof then that explains it.
Last edited by VinyTapestry849 on Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:36 am, edited 2 times in total.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7480
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: New City Arena

#289 Post by Ben » Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:54 am

Its a retractible roofed stadium with a capacity of 27,000. I think the comparison was with our 16,000 closed roof stadium at around the same cost....

User avatar
gnrc_louis
Legendary Member!
Posts: 877
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 2:04 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: New City Arena

#290 Post by gnrc_louis » Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:10 am

VinyTapestry849 wrote:
Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:49 am
rev wrote:
Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:53 pm
FB_IMG_1646306258547.jpg

Nee stadium for Tassie if the AFL grants them an AFL license.
27,000 capacity.
AFL sized stadium, obviously.
What are they proposing here for nearly $700 million that's for sports that use playing areas not even half an AFL oval? Gold plated toilets?
Tassie's new stadium will be barely economically viable, not even half the capacity of the AO as you said. What are they thinking? Adelaide oval cost $450m and its the most praised venue in the country. So what is $700m going to get you, titanium roof? Robot staff? Cushioned and heated seats???
The amount of seats would correlate with the population of Tasmania. A constantly half empty 50,000 stadium would have a terrible atmosphere. Bigger is certainly not always better with stadiums.

VinyTapestry849
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:03 pm

Re: New City Arena

#291 Post by VinyTapestry849 » Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:09 am

gnrc_louis wrote:
Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:10 am
VinyTapestry849 wrote:
Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:49 am
rev wrote:
Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:53 pm
FB_IMG_1646306258547.jpg

Nee stadium for Tassie if the AFL grants them an AFL license.
27,000 capacity.
AFL sized stadium, obviously.
What are they proposing here for nearly $700 million that's for sports that use playing areas not even half an AFL oval? Gold plated toilets?
Tassie's new stadium will be barely economically viable, not even half the capacity of the AO as you said. What are they thinking? Adelaide oval cost $450m and its the most praised venue in the country. So what is $700m going to get you, titanium roof? Robot staff? Cushioned and heated seats???
The amount of seats would correlate with the population of Tasmania. A constantly half empty 50,000 stadium would have a terrible atmosphere. Bigger is certainly not always better with stadiums.
I agree with that corresponding fact with the population and capacity of the stadium may not be filled, but If Tasmania wants a thriving AFL club they'll have to do better. The crows and power have many games at the Adelaide oval per year, consistently getting 40,000+ per match, and still have financial problems. Tassie will have a really tough time with finances if they're only getting ticket sales of below 20,000 per match, let alone have the money to start merchandise to help to fund. And that's only if the Tasmanian public get behind it. I do support them though. Its about time they have a team.

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

Re: New City Arena

#292 Post by ChillyPhilly » Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:13 am

Hopefully Tasmania make it convertible to a rectangular configuration.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6039
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

Re: New City Arena

#293 Post by rev » Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:20 am

VinyTapestry849 wrote:
Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:09 am
gnrc_louis wrote:
Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:10 am
VinyTapestry849 wrote:
Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:49 am

Tassie's new stadium will be barely economically viable, not even half the capacity of the AO as you said. What are they thinking? Adelaide oval cost $450m and its the most praised venue in the country. So what is $700m going to get you, titanium roof? Robot staff? Cushioned and heated seats???
The amount of seats would correlate with the population of Tasmania. A constantly half empty 50,000 stadium would have a terrible atmosphere. Bigger is certainly not always better with stadiums.
I agree with that corresponding fact with the population and capacity of the stadium may not be filled, but If Tasmania wants a thriving AFL club they'll have to do better. The crows and power have many games at the Adelaide oval per year, consistently getting 40,000+ per match, and still have financial problems. Tassie will have a really tough time with finances if they're only getting ticket sales of below 20,000 per match, let alone have the money to start merchandise to help to fund. And that's only if the Tasmanian public get behind it. I do support them though. Its about time they have a team.
There's a lot more to it then how many people come through the gates/tickets sold. But that's another story for another thread.
Tassie will do fine.

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2170
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

Re: New City Arena

#294 Post by Nort » Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:44 am

VinyTapestry849 wrote:
Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:09 am
gnrc_louis wrote:
Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:10 am
VinyTapestry849 wrote:
Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:49 am

Tassie's new stadium will be barely economically viable, not even half the capacity of the AO as you said. What are they thinking? Adelaide oval cost $450m and its the most praised venue in the country. So what is $700m going to get you, titanium roof? Robot staff? Cushioned and heated seats???
The amount of seats would correlate with the population of Tasmania. A constantly half empty 50,000 stadium would have a terrible atmosphere. Bigger is certainly not always better with stadiums.
I agree with that corresponding fact with the population and capacity of the stadium may not be filled, but If Tasmania wants a thriving AFL club they'll have to do better. The crows and power have many games at the Adelaide oval per year, consistently getting 40,000+ per match, and still have financial problems. Tassie will have a really tough time with finances if they're only getting ticket sales of below 20,000 per match, let alone have the money to start merchandise to help to fund. And that's only if the Tasmanian public get behind it. I do support them though. Its about time they have a team.
Tasmania has a population of half a million, greater Hobart has a population of a quarter million, it seems at the right scale for that.

JCK98
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2019 10:55 pm

Re: New City Arena

#295 Post by JCK98 » Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:35 pm

VinyTapestry849 wrote:
Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:49 am
rev wrote:
Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:53 pm
FB_IMG_1646306258547.jpg

Nee stadium for Tassie if the AFL grants them an AFL license.
27,000 capacity.
AFL sized stadium, obviously.
What are they proposing here for nearly $700 million that's for sports that use playing areas not even half an AFL oval? Gold plated toilets?
Tassie's new stadium will be barely economically viable. Adelaide oval cost $450m (nearly half of what is being proposed) and its the most praised venue in the country. So what is $700m going to get you, robot staff & cushioned seats? If it's got a retractable roof then that explains it.
$450m for the Southern stand, Eastern stand and Northern hill works; $5m for the Western stand upgrades for 2014; $30m for the parklands around it; $40m for the footbridge and SACA's debt of $85m got cleared as well. All up that project cost $610m. https://indaily.com.au/news/2014/05/07 ... wrap-610m/

Western Stand which was rebuild for 2010-11 cost $116m (including $25m funding from both state and federal governments).
So ended up being about $640m all up without including SACA's debt a lot of which they probably acquired redeveloping the western stands.

A-Town
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 362
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2017 10:14 am

Re: New City Arena

#296 Post by A-Town » Fri Mar 04, 2022 6:21 pm

rev wrote:
Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:53 pm
FB_IMG_1646306258547.jpg

Nee stadium for Tassie if the AFL grants them an AFL license.
27,000 capacity.
AFL sized stadium, obviously.
What are they proposing here for nearly $700 million that's for sports that use playing areas not even half an AFL oval? Gold plated toilets?
It will have a retractable roof, retractable seats and will require land reclamation. Expensive yes, but will be great for Hobart.

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2436
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

Re: New City Arena

#297 Post by Patrick_27 » Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:28 am

A-Town wrote:
Fri Mar 04, 2022 6:21 pm
rev wrote:
Thu Mar 03, 2022 9:53 pm
FB_IMG_1646306258547.jpg

Nee stadium for Tassie if the AFL grants them an AFL license.
27,000 capacity.
AFL sized stadium, obviously.
What are they proposing here for nearly $700 million that's for sports that use playing areas not even half an AFL oval? Gold plated toilets?
It will have a retractable roof, retractable seats and will require land reclamation. Expensive yes, but will be great for Hobart.
Conceptually, I love this for Hobart. I just wish the design was more in keeping with the Hobart surrounds. Something like Westpac Stadium in Wellington.

NTRabbit
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 365
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:00 pm

Re: New City Arena

#298 Post by NTRabbit » Sun Mar 06, 2022 1:51 pm

I imagine some of the high price for the Hobart stadium compared to AO is that they're building it half over the water in the Derwent

Jaymz
Legendary Member!
Posts: 976
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm

Re: New City Arena

#299 Post by Jaymz » Sun Mar 06, 2022 3:07 pm

I agree with that corresponding fact with the population and capacity of the stadium may not be filled, but If Tasmania wants a thriving AFL club they'll have to do better. The crows and power have many games at the Adelaide oval per year, consistently getting 40,000+ per match, and still have financial problems. Tassie will have a really tough time with finances if they're only getting ticket sales of below 20,000 per match, let alone have the money to start merchandise to help to fund. And that's only if the Tasmanian public get behind it. I do support them though. Its about time they have a team.
Top
I have always thought that Tassie deserves to have a team in the AFL. The argument that they need to get 20,000+ to the games to be financially viable is questionable, but I doubt the Gold Coast Suns have ever had more than 10,000 attend any of their games regularly since their inception. The difference is the AFL has been propping GC up both financially and with priority draft picks ever since they started and they've not once made a finals series. I would say the same is true for Greater Western Sydney, but at least in their case they've been more than competitive, playing in multiple finals series and a Grand Final in 2019. Tasmania should feel hard done by if they are not granted a license because I think that after a few seasons they could stand on their own two feet financially and the locals would support their team by actually attending matches.

User avatar
PeFe
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1624
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:47 am

Re: New City Arena

#300 Post by PeFe » Sun Mar 06, 2022 3:18 pm

All this talk of a new AFL stadium in Hobart, an new Tassie team etc should be its own thread in the "Beyond South Australia" section.....the New City Arena discussion has been totally derailed.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: citywatcher, gnrc_louis, Google Adsense [Bot], Smithy84 and 84 guests