So the parklands looked the same 60 years ago then?

Some people would have mobility issues, especially with a more obese and ageing population.
yeah fair point I guess I meant people without those issues.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_demandrubberman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 22, 2018 5:18 pmI could see that underground parks with parkland on top would work. It would also make the parkland accessible on weekends too.
A CBD based tram network from these car parks could then make sense.
However, I have no idea of the cost, and even less confidence in the ability of doing it economically.
Precisely.Goodsy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 22, 2018 5:21 pmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_demandrubberman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 22, 2018 5:18 pmI could see that underground parks with parkland on top would work. It would also make the parkland accessible on weekends too.
A CBD based tram network from these car parks could then make sense.
However, I have no idea of the cost, and even less confidence in the ability of doing it economically.
I hope it's just a week long wait.adelaide transport wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 2:11 pmThe Transport Minister has this afternoon announced that the planned opening of the North Terrace and King William Road extensions will be delayed
During driver training issues were found with the signalling system. Experts are now investigating the problem.
Meanwhile the company that supplied the system are flying from Germany to Adelaide to help fix the problem. No new starting date has been announced.
When trams terminated in Victoria Square and Moseley Square with those scissors crossovers, they had NO signals. They also had no accidents. They also just obeyed ordinary traffic signals at intersections, except South Terrace where the trams went diagonally across road traffic.adelaide transport wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 2:11 pmThe Transport Minister has this afternoon announced that the planned opening of the North Terrace and King William Road extensions will be delayed
During driver training issues were found with the signalling system. Experts are now investigating the problem.
Meanwhile the company that supplied the system are flying from Germany to Adelaide to help fix the problem. No new starting date has been announced.
Were there no tram specific aspects in the traffic signals? At the Vic Square terminus was there no protection in the traffic lights from the conflicting movements: right turn from the Square into Grote and tram leaving terminus into King William?rubberman wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 7:19 pm
When trams terminated in Victoria Square and Moseley Square with those scissors crossovers, they had NO signals. They also had no accidents. They also just obeyed ordinary traffic signals at intersections, except South Terrace where the trams went diagonally across road traffic.
So, we spent all that money on signals which still don't work...to achieve what?
It is truly bizarre.
Depends when you are looking at it. When the tram terminated at Moores, definitely not. When the terminus was shifted to the centre of the Square, I think the traffic lights had a "T" aspect, at least in the latter years. However, the points for the scissors crossovers, and at the Morphetville sidings and at Colley Terrace, those are a definite no for any sort of lights. It seems reasonable to think that if a tram driver was going to ignore a 3 metre long point blade setting, they weren't going to take much notice of a 200mm coloured light. Further, if they were going fast enough for that to be a problem, they were definitely exceeding posted speed limits.PD2/20 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:08 pmWere there no tram specific aspects in the traffic signals? At the Vic Square terminus was there no protection in the traffic lights from the conflicting movements: right turn from the Square into Grote and tram leaving terminus into King William?rubberman wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 7:19 pm
When trams terminated in Victoria Square and Moseley Square with those scissors crossovers, they had NO signals. They also had no accidents. They also just obeyed ordinary traffic signals at intersections, except South Terrace where the trams went diagonally across road traffic.
So, we spent all that money on signals which still don't work...to achieve what?
It is truly bizarre.
Was it the case that traffic lights were introduced in the city after the closure of the tram system in the 1950s? The Glenelg line didn't have the complication of tram junctions at major signalised road intersections.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 3 guests