Although in reality, I suspect NTRabbit is correct. Our children will be so proud of us

Lol why? Because they offered an in-depth policy agenda including more for education, health etc. through closing absurd tax loopholes (and a major contributor to the structural deficits we keep seeing) like negative gearing and franking credits? Because they proposed meaningful action on climate change?
I'm not sure which Labor person I heard on radio this morning who actually gave the electorate credit for understanding Labor's policies, and rejecting them. He said the public had understood what was proposed, and didn't like it, so Labor should go back to the drawing board and come up with something different. That is quite a different attitude to Tanya Plibersek who said that the policy was good, and people had not been given enough time to understand it, so when we do, we will like it.gnrc_louis wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 6:21 pmLol why? Because they offered an in-depth policy agenda including more for education, health etc. through closing absurd tax loopholes (and a major contributor to the structural deficits we keep seeing) like negative gearing and franking credits? Because they proposed meaningful action on climate change?
The Coalition ran a fear campaign centered around tax and "but Bill Shorten is unlikable!" and it worked. Maybe Albanese can just run a popularity based "presidential" style (even though our system doesn't actually work like that) campaign in 2022 based around beer, wearing caps and footy lmao
Sure many voters might not like those policies, but if they want a Government to provide a good level of services (most voters of course do), then unless they dramatically raise income taxes (obv they won't) or the GST, the government is going to continue running deficits. This isn't necessary a problem in itself (there's plenty of literature online by economists on why this is the case), but it seems like many voters do believe it is.SBD wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:48 pm
I'm not sure which Labor person I heard on radio this morning who actually gave the electorate credit for understanding Labor's policies, and rejecting them. He said the public had understood what was proposed, and didn't like it, so Labor should go back to the drawing board and come up with something different. That is quite a different attitude to Tanya Plibersek who said that the policy was good, and people had not been given enough time to understand it, so when we do, we will like it.
Bill Shorten dodging questions was a running theme this election.Jaymz wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 9:04 pmI think one thing that sunk Labor towards the end was due to their climate change policies, particularly emissions targets. Not so much the policies themselves, but what the cost would be to the economy, jobs etc.
When pressed by the media about the topic on several occasions, he continually dodged around the answer or started getting hostile towards the reporter. Which to me could mean one of two things...... they had done zero modelling on what effect such policies would do the economy in the medium-long term, or the figures were so shocking that there was no way in hell they wanted to public to know.
Since when do we get anything promised immediately after an election?
The taxes sure seem to come in pretty quick....
It was explicitly a Liberal campaign promise that the tax offset would be in place by July 1st: https://www.liberal.org.au/our-plan/lower-taxes
Of course she felt unsafe, GetUp is a socialist militant group with foreign funding. They should be shut down as a threat to our democracy.SA Liberal MP Nicolle Flint reveals toll of personal attacks during 2019 Federal Election campaign
Mitch Mott, The Advertiser
July 17, 2019 10:36pm
SA Liberal backbencher Nicolle Flint has spoken of being terrorised by lobby group GetUp!, claiming members set out to destroy her during the federal election campaign.
Ms Flint has said in an interview in The Australian on Thursday that the attack was so “toxic” many people might now be afraid to enter politics.
She told how the abuse reached a point where she feared for her safety.
“This was a campaign to destroy me personally, a concerted attack to destroy me mentally,” Ms Flint said.
“We regard ourselves as an open and civil society. Instead, I ended up feeling unsafe for much of the campaign.”
Ms Flint’s office was egged, her posters defaced and she was forced to call in police after she was the victim of stalking.
The seat of Boothby, in Adelaide’s south, was identified by the activist group as one of the Liberal Party’s most vulnerable.
Ms Flint, alongside other conservative politicians including Peter Dutton, Tony Abbott and Kevin Andrews, became a target of the group.
Ms Flint reported the stalking incidents in May, resulting in two men, aged 40 and 64, being reported and cautioned.
One of the men, Clarence Gardens resident David Walsh, denied any wrong-doing despite reportedly attending numerous events run by Ms Flint and taking photos of her.
He was spotted taking photos of Ms Flint through the window of a community event at Blackwood.
He also posted photos of Ms Flint on his personal social media account taken during Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s visit to Adelaide.
Got any proof of this?
You looked into it and that's all you found? So do we take the conclusion that either 1) you're not very good at research, or 2) you're a member of getup, or 3) you'll say anything and ignore inconvenient facts to argue with Rev..?rhino wrote: ↑Thu Jul 18, 2019 8:56 amGot any proof of this?
Or do we just add it to the growing list of Rev's Outrageous Opinions?
From what I can see, (and this is not an opinion, it's what I found when I looked into what they were doing), GetUp is an apolitical vehicle for the people of Australia to use to (try to) achieve particular goals. The group is growing and growing, and more power to them - through being able to get common people to lobby politicians (and we all know that big business certainly lobbies politicians) they are actually more democratic than any of the political parties on offer at the moment.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest